An article recently appeared in the Epoch Times titled, “Deaths of Elderly Who Recovered From COVID-19, but Died After Vaccine, Raise Questions,” by Sheryl Atkisson about nursing homes in Kentucky and Arkansas reporting two small clusters of deaths after CoViD-19 vaccinations were administered. In Kentucky, four seniors succumbed the same day they received their vaccination on Dec. 30, 2020. Three of the four had already contracted CoViD-19 prior to receiving the vaccination. One wonders why in God’s name the medical staff of the facility would be recommending vaccines to people who would have already built up immunity to CoViD-19 due to prior infection. While some so-called medical professionals are recommending the vaccine even for those who have had the virus and recovered, it beggars belief and makes one wonder, who among these fools is more deficient in common sense, the medical staff or the patients, the medical staff for recommending it, and the patients for agreeing to it. Perhaps in the end they will both be Darwin Award recipients.
In Arkansas, four seniors died at a long-term care facility about a week after their vaccination. Long-term care is apparently a misnomer in these facilities, where the administering of unnecessary and ill-advised vaccines has turned them into short-term care facilities. Each of the patients tested positive for CoViD-19 following vaccination, which obviously attests to both the efficacy of the vaccine and the benefit of taking it. The way 2021 is shaping up, it should see the conferring of more Darwin Awards than any year in history.
So-called authorities are claiming that deaths after vaccination don’t necessarily mean the vaccine is to blame, when a child of six would conclude otherwise without much mental effort. Either a lack of common sense is to blame for the poor deductive powers, or a supreme lack of ethics, one or the other. Of those receiving coronavirus vaccines, many are elderly and frail, they argue, or already suffering from serious illnesses. That makes it difficult to know whether there’s a connection. If there so elderly and frail, why the hell are they risking their lives giving them a vaccine then? Obviously, there is a connection to the vaccine if they are citing the fact that they are so elderly and frail; they practically had one foot in the grave to begin with. Either these fork-tongued hypocrites fail to see the self-confuting nature of their arguments, or they’re too busy lying to see what a tangled web they weave.
Kentucky Nursing Home Deaths
According to VAERS reports, the Kentucky deaths occurred on Dec. 30 after these care home occupants received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. An ill 88-year-old woman, who had been post-CoViD for over 14 days, was given the Pfizer-BioNTech shot while she was “unresponsive in [her] room.” Well, that surely must have helped, saints preserve us. She died within an hour and a half (914961-1). Small bloody wonder. An 88-year-old who was reportedly “15 days post-CoViD” received the shot, was monitored for 15 minutes afterward, and passed away within 90 minutes (914994-1). One wonders what happened after the 15-minute monitoring period, poor dear. Was she just abandoned and left to God? A third report describes an 88-year-old woman, who was post-CoViD for over 14 days, vomited four minutes after receiving her shot, became short of breath, and passed away that night (915562-1). But, of course, the so-called authorities cannot see any direct link to her receiving the vaccine, nor can they see the forest for the trees so lost are they in the thickness of the woods. And an 85-year-old woman vaccinated at 5 p.m. was “found unresponsive” less than two hours later and died shortly after (915682-1). No link to the vaccine naturally. She obviously responded well to it, wouldn’t you say?
In response to questions about the Kentucky cluster, a spokesman for the CDC said its experts noted “no pattern…among the [Kentucky] cases that would indicate a concern for the safety of the CoViD-19 vaccine.” Right, sure, so why did this spokesman not give his name? Why all the secrecy if everything’s above board and there’s nothing to worry about? That’s because he damn well knows no one’s buying it and he would be pelted with eggs if we knew his name.
Scientists differ on whether people who have had CoViD-19, like the Kentucky patients, should receive the CoViD-19 vaccination at all. The CDC insists it’s safe for people who have recovered from CoViD-19 to receive the vaccine and that there’s no minimum interval recommended between infection and vaccination. Fine, but the question all of us ignorant lay people want to ask is why people who’ve had the virus and recovered need the vaccine, when they’ve obviously already built up immunity. Plus, the CDC has received warnings from Dr. Whalen and others that the CoViD-19 vaccine is probably not to be recommended for those who’ve been infected and recovered because the mRNA vaccine is likely to initiate an autoimmune response that will kill them. And so, what has happened? And it is not as if the CDC can feign ignorance and say they didn’t know, because they have received multiple warnings from multiple medical professionals and have negligently chosen to ignore them all. Frankly, they’re criminals and should be hauled before the International Criminal Court.
“Vaccination should be offered to persons regardless of history of prior symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 [the virus that causes CoViD-19] infection,” the CDC states. What’s their justification for this? There are no studies to recommend it. And since the CDC is a private entity, posing fraudulently as a public entity, it is probably looking at a huge share of the profits from the allocation and delivery of these vaccines.
Contrary to the CDC’s stance, other scientists say vaccinating people who are already considered immune due to prior CoViD-19 infection wastes valuable doses of a vaccine in short supply. In addition, neither Pfizer’s nor Moderna’s studies show any benefit in vaccinating previously infected patients.
The Kentucky patients were vaccinated shortly after the CDC disseminated false information on this point. The CDC claimed studies showed vaccines were effective for those who had already been infected with CoViD-19. The disinformation was published on the agency’s website, in its Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, and in a webinar instruction to medical professionals. How do these criminals get away with this? The answer is because the country is corrupt to the core, due to a loss of institutional and personal integrity, brought on by the corrupting influence of mass media and miseducation in the country’s school system.
In the webinar, the CDC’s Dr. Sarah Oliver falsely stated, “Data from both clinical trials suggests that people with prior infection are still likely to benefit from vaccination.”
Under pressure from Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who first flagged the CDC’s criminally fraudulent claims in December, the agency recently issued a correction, but used wording that still falsely implies that studies had shown that the vaccines helped people previously infected with CoViD-19. It is a blatant lie, but they must maintain appearances of respectability, so they obfuscate instead of coming clean and admitting the error.
In the meantime, preliminary results from a study co-authored by a team of more than two dozen researchers noted that people infected with CoViD-19 in the past “experience systemic side effects with a significantly higher frequency” after vaccination than others. This is because of the remnant viral particles from the pervious infection enticing a response from the protein spikes the mRNA vaccine has prompted the cell factories of the body to produce.
The CDC confirms that it’s monitoring reports that people who’ve already had CoViD-19 seem to be suffering significantly more frequent or more severe reactions after vaccination, or “reactogenicity,” than those who didn’t have CoViD-19.
“CDC is aware of reports of increased reactogenicity (such as fever, chills, and muscle aches) in persons who have had CoViD-19,” said a spokesman. The reality is that the CDC officials are not just aware of the reports of events, but are damn well aware of the cause too. It is utterly deplorable that the institutions of the land have been so badly corrupted that there is no means available of redressing these wrongs or putting a stop to the systematic genocide of the population. They will just keep issuing denials that there is any link between the deaths and the vaccines, and will doubtless pin the blame on a CoViD-19 variant that managed to overwhelm the vaccine shield. Those shrewd enough to see through their lies can call their bluff, but those inured to the programming, who trust the white coats and those in authority to give them the facts become accomplices in their own murder, or should we call it suicide?
Arkansas Nursing Home Deaths
Nursing homes in Arkansas reported four deaths following receipt of Moderna’s vaccine. All four patients tested positive for CoViD-19 after vaccination, according to the VAERS reports. But there’s no indication as to whether they already had CoViD-19 or became infected from the vaccine. The confusion lies in the fact that one is not meant to know. A vaccine designed to infect the patient with the very virus it is meant to defend against would be the last suspect on the list. It’s like an Agatha Christie mystery, where the killer is the one you least suspect, rather like the genocidal mad scientist Fauci being in charge of the vaccine response when he’s the one responsible for transferring the gain-of-function technology to the Wuhan lab in the first place. The homicidal maniac is posing as the savior and is the last person the average dupe would suspect as the villain behind the entire plandemic.
A 65-year-old man (921547-1) who received the Moderna vaccine on Jan. 2, 2021, died two days later, with the VAERS report noting that he had CoViD-19. Three other Arkansas seniors died about a week after receiving the Moderna vaccine on Dec. 22, 2020. The person reporting the death of an 82-year-old man (917117-1) six days after his shot claimed he was vaccinated in order to “mitigate his risk,” but that “this was unsuccessful and [the] patient died.” The VAERS report notes, “After vaccination, patient tested positive for CoViD-19.” In each of these cases, the cover story is that the patients were vaccinated ostensibly to lower the risk of infection, but in actual fact were not protected at all, and ended up coming down with the virus. How is that possible unless the vaccine itself was to blame? And if it wasn’t to blame, it obviously provided as much protection as a door with a lock being left ajar.
Two elderly women, ages 90 (917790-1) and 78 (917793-1), were vaccinated the same day as the 65-year-old man and also tested positive for CoViD-19 about a week after their shots and died. According to the unnamed person who reported the 90-year-old’s death, “the vaccine did not have enough time to prevent CoViD 19” and “There is no evidence that the vaccination caused patient’s death. It simply didn’t have time to save her life.” The person who reported the 78-year-old’s death claimed she died “as a result of CoViD-19 and her underlying health conditions and not as a result of the vaccine.” The vaccine didn’t have time to save her life? The denials and obfuscations aren’t working. Too many people are paying attention because it’s the lives of they and their families that are on the line. They’re hearing the obfuscations and seeing the smokescreens and they’re not fooled.
In response to questions about the Arkansas cluster, the CDC said, “Surveillance data to date do not indicate excess deaths among elderly patients receiving CoViD-19 vaccinations.” Overall, says the agency, the number of deaths at long-term care facilities following CoViD-19 vaccinations is no higher than what would be expected to occur naturally. Really, then why have these long-term care facilities suddenly turned into short-term care facilities following the vaccine rollout? And why is the CDC issuing these statements? Is this a personification or have institutions taken on a life of their own and grown vocal cords? Clearly, the anonymous spokesperson hiding behind the CoViD-19 mask has a good reason to remain veiled. They obviously do not want to get egg on their face from being pelted with eggs.
The CDC is allegedly “monitoring the impact of the vaccines” on already-frail patients such as the chronically ill in nursing homes. No doubt they are. As an accomplice in a campaign of genocide, you would naturally want to see that the bioweapon being deployed is efficient. This monitoring exercise adds a whole new meaning to vaccine efficacy.
In Norway, 23 people died shortly after receiving the CoViD-19 vaccination. After investigating 13 of the deaths, Norway’s medical agency has concluded side effects that are common with the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, such as fever, nausea, and diarrhea, “may have contributed to fatal outcomes in some of the frail patients.” Do you think? You just have to shake your head and wonder how these people managed to procure these jobs with the medical agency.
“There is a possibility that these common adverse reactions, that are not dangerous in fitter, younger patients and are not unusual with vaccines, may aggravate underlying disease in the elderly,” said Steinar Madsen, medical director of the Norwegian Medicines Agency. Madsen should be ashamed of himself, and might well be abashed if he had any shame. He’s covering up a crime against humanity, and rather transparently at that. If he’s not careful, he’s going to get caught in his own web of lies and expose himself, but then he may be used to that.
A WHO expert panel disagrees with this evaluation. It says the deaths “are in line with the expected, all-cause mortality rates and causes of death in the sub-population of frail, elderly individuals, and the available information does not confirm a contributory role for the vaccine in the reported fatal events.” Just the same, though their opinions differ, both entities are obfuscating and covering up a genocide operation of the country’s elderly population. The cowardly frauds will be exposed and have their own lives terminated as they deserve for their complicity in these crimes against humanity.
One unanswered question is whether patients who are both frail and have already had CoViD-19 might find themselves at greater risk when vaccinated. First, those with a previous CoViD-19 infection might be more likely to suffer adverse effects from the vaccine, according to scientific reports. Second, their frailty may make them less able to handle the adverse events, as Norway’s medical agency found with some patients. The frailty factor aside, if they’ve already suffered the stress of infection and recovered, their body probably couldn’t put up with another assault. In addition, if they’ve had the infection and recovered, their body has probably built its own fortress of resistance and doesn’t require a vaccine. It’s just common sense, something our whole civilization seems to have lost.
In the U.S., there are numerous VAERS reports of cases involving elderly, frail people, who had been previously infected with CoViD-19, recovered, then got vaccinated, and died.
A 96-year-old Ohio woman tested positive for CoViD-19 in November, got the Pfizer vaccine on Dec. 28, 2020, in a rehab facility after a fall, and died that afternoon (915920-1). Giving a man so senior in age a vaccine after suffering a fall? It sounds like pretty good grounds for a malpractice suit.
Then there’s the case of a 94-year-old Michigan man at a senior’s facility, who had CoViD-19 and other illnesses, received the Moderna vaccine on Jan. 2, 2021, and died of cardiac arrest two days later (918487-1). Detecting the spike proteins from the virus infection in the heart tissue, the mRNA vaccine must have encouraged an antibody attack that caused trauma to the heart, precipitating the poor man’s heart attack and death. If a layman can figure that out, what is the doctors’ excuse?
A 91-year-old Michigan woman with Alzheimer’s and other illnesses at a senior living facility who had tested positive for CoViD-19 received the Moderna vaccine on Dec. 30, 2020. She died four days later (924186-1). Perhaps she forgot she’d already received the dose and kept asking for another.
And an 85-year-old California woman with Alzheimer’s and other disorders at a senior living facility received the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine on Jan. 5, 2021, and was found dead the same day. After her vaccination, an earlier CoViD-19 test from Jan. 3 returned positive, though she’d had no symptoms (924456-1). How convenient that the date of the CoViD-19 PCR test was found to have occurred on Jan.3, two days before she received the vaccine. Did they back date her medical chart to hide the fact she got CoViD from the vaccine? Or perhaps she gave them the wrong date when they asked her when she had taken her PCR test.
Then there’s the case of a 104-year-old woman in New York, who received the Pfizer vaccine on Dec. 30, 2020. The next day, a CoViD-19 test was done and came back positive. She became ill the following day and died on Jan. 4, 2021 (920832-1). It seems pretty clear that she got CoViD-19 from the vaccine. Besides, why would they give a CoViD-19 vaccine to such an elderly woman? It seems incredibly imprudent to take the risk. Why would they even bother unless the intention was to top her?
Then, there’s the absurd case of a 71-year-old New York man, who received the Moderna vaccine on Dec. 21, 2020, then developed a fever and respiratory distress, and tested positive for CoViD-19. Okay, so the vaccine obviously did a world of good. So then what did they do? They gave him remdesivir. This makes no sense. Why would they not give him time for the vaccine to do its work, when they have claimed in other cases that the patients’ died before the vaccine had time to do its magic? Obviously, the medical staff must have concluded in this case that the vaccine had done the man no good, so that the only alternative was to give him another antidote. He died after 6 days (922977-1).
A WHO vaccine safety subcommittee reviewed reports of deaths among the frail, elderly after the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The members determined that there was no cause for concern. Well, we can all rest easy then. The gods in the white coats have spoken. “The benefit-risk balance of [Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine] BNT162b2 remains favorable in the elderly, and does not suggest any revision, at present, to the recommendations around the safety of this vaccine,” said the WHO officials. Definitely, the rate at which the vaccine is eviscerating the elderly seems to confirm that the weaponized vaccine has passed the litmus test and is a highly efficacious bioweapon. Kudos to you WHO! And exactly who did you say those WHO officials were?
Pfizer, Moderna, and CDC Responses
In response to questions for this report, Pfizer issued a statement saying: “We take adverse events that are potentially associated with our CoViD-19 vaccine, BNT162b2, very seriously. We closely monitor all such events and collect relevant information to share with global regulatory authorities. Based on ongoing safety reviews performed by Pfizer, BioNTech and health authorities, BNT162b2 retains a positive benefit-risk profile for the prevention of CoViD-19 infections.” If one is judging the merits of the vaccine by the fact that it kills people before they can catch CoViD-19, then yes, certainly, it is highly efficacious. Who wouldn’t recommend it for grandma, especially if you’re in line for an inheritance?
Pfizer said that millions of people have been vaccinated and “serious adverse events, including deaths that are unrelated to the vaccine, are unfortunately likely to occur at a similar rate as they would in the general population.” Pfizer said? Since when can a corporate entity engage in discourse? Why are its spokespersons insisting on anonymity behind their CoViD mask? Why don’t they identify themselves? Is it because it is more than just themselves that they are hiding?
Pfizer didn’t answer whether it has concluded that any deaths might be linked to vaccination. It also wouldn’t answer whether it has looked at any clusters of deaths, or noted any patterns or areas of concern. That’s because they don’t need to look at the causes of the death clusters. They know full well that their vaccine is the cause. The company also wouldn’t say whether it recommends that those recently or currently infected with CoViD-19 get vaccinated. Hell no. They’re already in enough trouble as it is with their Frankenvaccine. They don’t want to implicate themselves any further in the deadly morass, so they plead the 5th.
Moderna didn’t answer our questions or request for information and comment. Of course not. Felons are hardly likely to volunteer information or answer questions without a lawyer present. Were there nothing to hide, they wouldn’t show the least reticence Their conduct bears witness to their guilt more aptly than courtroom testimony.
As previously stated, the CDC quite absurdly recommends vaccination for people who’ve already been infected with CoViD-19. However, the agency wouldn’t offer a direct answer as to whether it’s safe for people to get vaccinated while they have an active CoViD-19 infection. A CDC spokesman said that deferring vaccination is recommended in such cases, but didn’t say whether it was due to a safety issue or not. The whole charade is patently ridiculous. If the vaccine is safe, why can’t it be issued in all cases? Why is it suddenly potentially dangerous for someone already infected with CoViD-19? What is the CDC hiding?
“Vaccination of persons with known current SARS-CoV-2 infection should be deferred until the person has recovered from the acute illness (if the person had symptoms) and criteria have been met for them to discontinue isolation,” says the CDC. “This recommendation applies to persons who develop SARS-CoV-2 infection before receiving any vaccine doses as well as those who develop SARS-CoV-2 infection after the first dose but before receipt of the second dose.”
UK care home deaths after vaccine for covid 19 see 11 minutes for a whistleblowers statement.