BILL GATES has issued a terrifying warning of a “bioterrorist smallpox pandemic

BILL GATES has issued a terrifying warning of a “bioterrorist smallpox pandemic” which could apparently arise if Governments don’t use lessons learned from COVID-19 to prepare wisely.

Bill Gates’s warning is a double entendre and actually intended as a threat, implying that if we are not good little compliant boys and girls who wear their masks and take their genocidal vaccines and go along with every fascist protocol of the UN and its agencies and their fascist minions in our own national governments and health agencies, we’re going to get hit by another bioweapon at the hands of Bill and his cronies in the World Economic Forum. There’s only one way to stop this Luciferian cabal and that is – stop them dead in their tracks.

Covid-19 Pandemic A Case of Patent Fraud

Timothy Spearman

Toronto International College Canada

*Corresponding Author

Timothy Spearman

Article History: | Received: 10.09.2021 Accepted: 20.09.2021 Published: 30.09.2021|

Abstract: Dr. David E Martin has declared that it is illegal to patent nature, but that didn’t stop the NIH and CDC from doing just that. Not only did these agencies make an illegal patent application for a coronavirus taken from nature, which had been altered in a lab using gain-of-function research applications to produce SARS-CoV-2, for which a patent application was made, but these government agencies also patented the PCR test used to detect the SARS-CoV-2, as well as the mRNA vaccine that was devised with the ostensible aim of defeating it. This is Hegelian—problem, reaction, solution—dialectics applied to health science, where the health authorities create the disease bioweapon pathogen in a lab, introduce it into the general population to cause a pandemic reaction, and then provide a one-size-sits-all-medical solution in the form of an alleged “vaccine,” which is actually a transhumanist experiment in the form of a gene therapy disguised as an inoculating jab. Given that WHO announced that there was a worldwide pandemic March 15, 2020, the fact that Fauci was already resolving on all the social distancing and lockdown measures two days later, as the text of the email to actor Morgan Fairchild reveals, shows that he is beholden to and in complete lockstep with WHO. Far from behaving like the head of a national health agency of the U.S., he is behaving more like a puppet of the world government behemoth that has imposed a dictatorship upon the world since the beginning of this so-called health emergency, taking the CCP lead by adopting all the measures that were implemented in China as the agreed upon protocol. What does this reveal? That this is a communist coup upon the world and all of our governments are captured. It also reveals that the world government bodies from the UN to WHO to WEF are all in cahoots with China and share its totalitarian agenda and ideology.

Keywords: illegal to patent nature, SARS-CoV-2, “vaccine,”.

Copyright @ 2021: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non commercial use (NonCommercial, or CC-BY-NC) provided the original author and source are credited.

Image is Available in PDF Format

Image is Available in PDF Format

It would be great if you could tweet to your many Twitter followers,” Dr. Anthony Fauci responded to Fairchild. “The American public should not be frightened, but should be prepared to mitigate an outbreak in this country by measures including social distancing, teleworking, temporary closure of schools, etc.”

The emails reveal him sparring over an antiviral drug with Ezekiel Emanuel, a former Obama administration health adviser, fielding questions about vaccines, and receiving an update from Mark Zuckerberg on Facebook’s plans for a coronavirus “information hub.” Zuckerberg also asked whether the social media company could provide resources to accelerate vaccine testing. And Fauci even responded to an offer from actor Morgan Fairchild to use her Twitter account on his behalf.i

Given that WHO announced that there was a worldwide pandemic March 15, 2020, the fact that Fauci was already resolving on all the social distancing and lockdown measures two days later, as the text of the email to Fairchild reveals, shows that he is beholden to and in complete lockstep with WHO. Far from behaving like the head of a national health agency of the U.S., he has acted more like a puppet of the world government behemoth that has imposed a dictatorship upon the world since the beginning of this so-called health emergency, taking the CCP lead by adopting all the measures that were implemented in China as the agreed upon protocol. What does that reveal? That this is a communist coup upon the world and all of our governments are captured. It also reveals that the world government bodies from the UN to WHO to WEF are all in cahoots with China and share its totalitarian agenda and ideology.

Image is Available in PDF Format

The emails show Fauci received a flurry of correspondence about the theory that the SARS-CoV-2 virus leaked from a lab in Wuhan. One such email sent to Fauci on April 16, 2020 by Francis Collins, the director of the NIAID, under the subject line “conspiracy gains momentum” contained a link to a news story highlighting a Fox News report that said the allegation had merit. Fauci’s response to Collins is entirely blacked out. Why is it redacted? What are they hiding? Such redactions should not be tolerated. It is actually against the law. If the ordinary citizen did it, they would be charged with tampering with evidence or obstruction of justice, but the government is allowed to get away with it because it is the government. The government tampers with evidence all the time. Files are shredded and government text is redacted on a routine basis. Then, there is the government’s tampering with crime scenes like that of the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City or the WTC Twin Towers on 9/11, when the hard, physical evidence of the crime scene wreckage was removed with unseemly haste on both occasions. Why are these abuses of power tolerated? Why is the government allowed to get away with it? People will say because it is the government. It doesn’t matter. The government should be held to account. The citizens have to rattle the cage relentlessly and never stop until justice is done.

The Buzzfeed report also shows that Fauci’s emails reveal his ambivalence toward his newfound celebrity status, but the fact that he has given the nod to a documentary crew who would tell his story. This has the look of feigned humility and socially acceptable public posturing. Additionally, the emails appear to show that the level of personal responsibility he is under is considerable and that the pandemic has exacted a toll on his private life. In one email sent on Feb. 18, weeks before the WHO declared the outbreak a global pandemic, he complained that he had not been able to spend sufficient time with his wife.

Some of the emails were reviewed by the Trump White House before being turned over to BuzzFeed News. The released emails represent just a portion of what was requested in the FOIA petition. They are filled with redactions, making them an incomplete record of Fauci’s correspondence. This would come as no surprise to anyone, but what should make us wonder is why we continue to refer to countries that do this as democracies, while vilifying so-called dictatorships like China for doing the same thing. Our governments are not behaving as democracies should and the uncharacteristic behavior is growing worse by the year to the point where our countries are no longer recognizable.

The Buzzfeed Report notes how the emails appear to portray Fauci as being ‘courteous’, ‘low-key’, and ‘empathetic’. It’s called political savviness and he is well trained and good at it. He has been groomed well for the position by the Deep State, and though he is supposed to be a deep cover agent, they blew it. He has been exposed. And the reason he has been exposed is that 7.8 billion people have been affected by this criminal fraud, resulting in a good percentage of that number doing their homework. Everyone has their unique gifts. Some people are good at researching the political side, other people follow the money, but a lot of dirt has emerged about a lot of people and Fauci is one of them. He has not helped his position either because of inconsistencies and being caught in his own lies. In short, it is usually the tangled web woven by the criminal that causes him to get caught in his own web of deceit. And right now, Fauci is looking more like the fly caught in the web than the spider responsible for weaving it in the first place.

Hence, it is not so much genuine politeness that causes Fauci to respond to emails with appropriate aplomb, but political savviness. It is this savviness which prompts him, when health professionals write him with harsh criticism of Trump’s handling of the pandemic, to reply with a simple “thank you,” in order to avoid any unnecessary political fallout.

Image is Available in PDF Format

The Buzzfeed report also notes how, in spite of employing politically savviness to avoid controversy, Fauci often defends his actions in the face of criticism.

Gregg Gonzalves is a case in point. Fauci received an email from Gonzalves, a prominent Yale School of Public Health epidemiologist, urging the NIAID director and his team to act promptly to contain the virus. The tone of Gonzalves’ email displays unmistakable frustration and annoyance at the mishandling of the pandemic response: “For those I know, I don’t doubt your commitment to public service,” Gonsalves writes, expressing his dissatisfaction. “But time is running out. We need vocally, unequivocal leadership now, that offers real guidance to communities about what to do, what might happen next.”

Image is Available in PDF Format

Fauci appeared outraged at the suggestion that his health team’s response was influenced by the political values of the Trump administration, as well he might, when he is actually taking his orders from the WHO, heading a national health dictatorship at the behest of an international health coup.

Gregg: I am surprised you included me in your note,” he wrote. “I genuflect to no one but science and always, always speak my mind when it comes to public health. I have consistently corrected misstatements by others and will continue to do so.”ii

This response is entirely disingenuous, since Fauci does indeed genuflect when it comes to those in power, definitely not the Trump administration, but more accurately his bosses in Rome, namely the Jesuit Order of the Catholic Church, the body, which at heart is the most likely entity to have coordinated the whole conspiracy given its history of operations.

Image is Available in PDF Format

Image is Available in PDF Format

Fauci has been at the helm addressing some of the world’s most difficult health and infectious disease crises, ranging from HIV/AIDS, Ebola, and Zika. It is interesting that he has been in position during all these crises, when in each case, the viruses emerged from bioweapons programs. Placing him in charge is rather like having the fox guarding the henhouse. Not only was Fauci responsible for the transfer of gain-of-function technology to the Wuhan National Institute of Virology, but he is also responsible for recommending many of the harmful responses to the disease pandemic threat, including the use of masks, which cause bacteriological infections and lower blood oxygen levels among wearers; the use of hand sanitizers, many of which contain methanol instead of ethanol, which is toxic; social distancing, which is psychologically harmful; shelter-in-place measures, which are psychologically and physically harmful; vaccinations with vaccines containing toxic spike proteins, which cause an array of autoimmune disease responses that ultimately lead to infertility, cytokine storm events, and death.

Indeed, the whole plandemic has employed Hegelian dialectics in a problem-reaction-solution scheme, that sees Fauci heading up the problem with the creation of a gain-of-function enhanced virus which has been weaponized to be more virulent and pathogenic. Putting him in charge of the pandemic response is like putting a mob boss in charge of an investigation into his own criminal activities.

Deep State fixer and master of operational coverups, Philip Zelikow, former Executive Director of the Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, informally referred to as the 9/11 Commission, has been placed in charge of the CoViD-19 Commission Planning Group, according to the University of Virginia, which intends to provide its Miller Center for Public Affairs as the group’s base to “Help America and the world learn from this pandemic and safeguard against future threats.”

Zelikow’s “non-partisan” group includes Event 201 participants, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security at the Bloomberg School of Public Health. Event 201, it will be remembered, was the “germ game” dress rehearsal exercise held in October of 2019 as a practice drill for the CoViD-19 plandemic. This is perfect Hegelian problem-reaction-solution dialectics, consisting of those in charge of the problem now being placed at the helm of the solutional coverup of the greatest crime against humanity ever perpetrated in the history of the world. Far from being “non-partisan,” this whitewash committee will exert the same control over the narrative that has been displayed since the beginning of this heinous crime. Funded by Schmidt Futures, headed by Bilderberger Eric Schmidt, the Skoll Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and Stand Together, which is Charles Koch’s philanthropic organization, the event is well supported by Deep State insiders and members of the cabal.

Zelikow’s hope is that this committee will lead directly to a future National CoViD-19 Commission, set up either by the White House or Congress.

Besides serving on President George W. Bush’s transition team in 2000-2001 and then on his Post-9/11 Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, Zelikow was the author of the Bush administration’s 2002 National Security Strategy, which laid out the case for pre-emptive war, which was used to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. This plan was outlined in a book authored by Paul Wolfowitz called The Project for a New American Century, which expressed its Hegelian problem-reaction-solution formulation for advancing the U.S. government’s War on Terror military operations for the early twenty-first century. In the opening paragraph he stated, that the U.S. government needed“some catastrophic and catalysing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” as a pretext for launching the Project for the New American Century.

Zelikov was a Neo-Con and White House insider under the administration of George W. Bush, who co-authored a book with Condaleezza Rice called To Build a Better World: Choices to End the Cold War and Create a Global Commonwealth. Rice, it should be remembered, was placed in charge of a wargame exercise involving the simulated hijacking of passenger airliners to be used as guided missiles to attack prominent landmarks in the U.S. This wargame exercise granted cover for the 9/11 operation to ensure that the U.S. Air Force and the security agencies of the U.S. were distracted by the wargame decoy exercise being held the same week as the September 11 attacks, so that when the wargame went live and real planes became involved, drill participants became confused and suffered from response paralysis. Yet, Rice denied that the U.S. government had any concept of such a scenario ever taking place, and were caught completely off-guard on 9/11.

What this means is that Zelikow was involved in the problem-reaction-solution strategy game from the beginning, as a member of the team responsible for planning the wargame drill exercise involving a plane hijacking simulation. Then, he headed up the commission charged with covering up the entire 9/11 government-led operation by being placed in charge of the inquiry, an investigation that never asked the right questions of the right people, and which, far from functioning as an inquiry, facilitated a complete whitewash.

For the reasons already stated, he performed his role as the Executive Director of the Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States aka 9/11 Commission, following the rejection of Henry Kissinger, whose deep unpopularity caused even The New York Times to lead the campaign to seek his removal.

As James Corbett put it, “He certainly absolutely fulfilled his role as Executive Director of the 9/11 Cover-Up Commission by facilitating the cover-up. And how did he do that? He directed who the Commission talked to, under what circumstances, what they talked about, what they didn’t talk about and what, ultimately ended up in the final report.”

Corbett illustrates this by pointing out how, before the Commission had scheduled a single internal staff meeting, Zelikow and his professor, Ernest May, had co-authored a draft of theFinal Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United Statesaka the 9/11 Commission Final Report.“It was so ridiculous, that even the 9/11 Commission staff, themselves internally parodied this and started sending around a parody draft outline of the Report of the President’s Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy aka the Warren Commission Report called the ‘Pre-Emptive Outline.’”

One of the headlines in this parody “Warren Commission Report” was, “Single Bullet: We Haven’t Seen the Evidence Yet but Really, We’re Sure.”

Corbett goes on to add, “So that’s the person that they’re going to put in charge of this preliminary to the National COVID Commission. Uh, yeah. I think we know where this is trending but here’s an important part of this story that might might get excluded, so let’s not exclude it: One of Zelikow’s specialties—his self-professed specialties—is ‘public myth’, the creation and management of public myth.

He, himself brags that this is his specialty and in a 1998 article on public myths, Zelikow identified “generational myths that are formed by those pivotal events that become etched in the minds of those who have lived through them.”

And also in 1998, he was writing about “Catastrophic Terrorism: Tackling the New Danger,” in Foreign Affairs, the publication of the Council on Foreign Relations.

So he was there, steering and shaping the formation of the ‘generational myth’ for the 21st century: the War on Terror; there, as the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission and now, he’s going to shape the ‘generational myth’ for this ‘Biosecurity State,’ the next ‘generational myth.’

Absolutely, top-to-bottom, this is outrageous and disgusting! I hope people will actually read through this University of Virginia puff piece to see what he’s talking about, ‘Oh, we’re going to have to get into private firms and non-profit entities and hospitals and pharmaceutical firms. They all have a role to play and they’ve all made responses to this disaster.’

Yeah, I wonder if we’re really going to get to the bottom of what really happened over the course of the past year or whether it’s all going to be covered-up and the ‘generational myth’ for the foundation of the Biosecurity State and vaccine passports and all of that are going to be hardwired-in, through a National Commission.

This is the way that they form the response to these ‘generation-changing’ kind of events and so this is where the real action of all of this really comes, is when they start hardwiring it in through these types of things.

Absolutely disgusting! Top-to-bottom! That was a mouthful that barely scrapes the surface. If you are interested in more, please type ‘Zelikow’ into the search bar, on and you’ll find a number of reports, including my 9/11 Suspects piece, all about Philip Zelikow and how he ran the 9/11 Cover-Up Commission and a podcast episode I did, called ‘Learn History with Philip Zelikow

I think it’s important to put this on the record. This is a cover-up in action. We’re watching it happen, right now.”iii

As with the War on Drugs, the War on Terror, and the War on HIV/AIDS, the tactical teams that were ostensibly meant to fight these scourges engaged in duplicitous double-dealing, exacerbating the problem quite by design. For instance, it was L.A. Times reporter Gary Webb who discovered that the DEA was engaged in peddling the very drugs they were supposed to be taking off the streets, dying for his trouble in a contract killing called a ‘suicide’ when he was found with two gunshot two wounds in the head.

The War on Terror has been no less duplicitous and hypocritical with government agencies recruiting dupes and patsies from local militias as well as mosques to set them up in counterterrorist operations to take the blame and fall for a terrorist plot they would never even have been involved with had it not been set up by the alphabet soup agency in charge, whether it’s the FBI, CIA, ATF, DoD. The patsy set up as the terrorist will then be arrested without the normal protections afforded a suspect, i.e. the right to remain silent (very often tortured instead to extract a confession), the right to fair representation, the right to a fair trial, the right to be tried by a jury of one’s peers. All of these rights went by the wayside in the face of post-9/11 legislation like the Patriot Act, an act which is far from patriotic, since it utterly demolishes the U.S. Bill of Rights and skewers the once inalienable rights accorded U.S. citizens and their counterparts in the so-called free world. The other Five Eye nations, the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, have basically followed in lockstep. It even became possible to extract confessions for those labelled “terrorists” through torture, something the courts of any democratic nation should deem inadmissible as evidence, since a completely innocent person would confess to a crime under torture as readily as the actual suspect, since torture is a form of duress capable of making anyone confess.

If that wasn’t enough the War on HIV/AIDS called for antiretroviral medications called AZT drug cocktails, a chemotherapy drug initially issued to cancer patients, but which was found to induce dangerous side effects and to be so reactive that it was shelved in the 1970s, only to brought back into circulation when the scourge of HIV/AIDS appeared. As with CoViD-19, the death certificates for patients placed on AZT drug cocktails listed HIV/AIDS as the cause of death, when the real cause was ‘medically’ induced poisoning of the patients with AZT drug cocktails, which caused an array of harmful side effects, leading to medically induced immune deficiency, kidney and liver complications, organ failure and death. However, instead of adverse reactions to AZT being cited as the cause. HIV/AIDS was identified as the killer in each and every case. In Canada alone, the spike in HIV/AIDS stats just happened to coincide with the period during which AZT drug cocktails were prescribed as the treatment of choice.

Like Zelikow, Fauci has been chosen to head the response to the CoViD-19 medical emergency because the best person to be placed in charge of the response to the CoViD-19 outbreak is the person responsible for orchestrating the biological attack on the civilian population of the U.S. and the world in the first place. No one is better placed to cover the perpetrators’ tracks, conceal evidence, obstruct justice, derail investigations, sidetrack inquiries, and coverup the crime than the perpetrator himself.

Just a day after the first reported CoViD-19 death in the U.S., the managing editor of ABC News’ medical unit emailed Fauci and asked him if he agreed with what a source at the Department of Homeland Security had told him: that epidemiology models showed that 98 million people could be infected with CoViD-19 and deaths from the virus could reach as high as 500,000.

On May 5, 2020, Mary Harris, an NIAID employee, wrote: “I am grateful to say my Director is Dr. Anthony Fauci and share with my family, friends, and church that if you said it, it’s gospel.”

Mary Harris’s blind worship of authority pretty much epitomizes the sycophantic nature and sheep mentality of subordinates lower on the pecking order at all levels of the hierarchy. Very few people are willing to poke their head above the parapet, but are far more likely to keep it buried in the sand. Very few people are willing to question someone of higher rank in our so-called free societies. They comply out of fear, afraid of being disciplined or fired for insubordination. In addition, they are brainwashed to respect the talking heads, the white coats and those in authority, or even those with deeper pockets. No shallower or stupider animal than the North American-raised and miseducated citizen has been envisioned in the history of the world. Our governments have done a superlative job of rendering our population braindead through fluoride in the water and neurotoxins in the vaccines. The rest of the mission has been accomplished with the idiot box, which has facilitated the devolution of our kind, which has become regressively stupider in two generations since the advent of public television till the brain has been so addled as to be reduced to mashed potatoes.

All the while, celebrity status was being foisted upon an embarrassed Fauci. Barely two months into the pandemic, merchandizers were capitalizing on the star status Fauci was garnering, with T-shirts, bobbleheads, socks, and even prayer candles being merchandized and sold featuring the grinning face of the NIH director. Fauci’s emails show he was clearly uncomfortable with all the attention he received.

Click on the ‘Cuomo Crush’ and ‘Fauci Fever’ link below. It will blow your mind. Our society is really totally nuts,” Fauci wrote in an April 8, 2020 email he forwarded to undisclosed recipients after he received a Google alert about news stories mentioning his name.

The previous month, a colleague had emailed Fauci a Washington Post article headlined “Fauci Socks, Fauci Doughnuts, Fauci Fan Art: The Coronavirus Experts Attract a Cult Following.” The top of the article tells the story of a Rochester, New York, shop that had sold out of donuts with Fauci’s face on them.

Truly surrealistic,” Fauci wrote. “Hopefully this all stops soon.” Later, he added: “It is not at all pleasant, that is for sure.”

The emails also reveal behind-the-scenes negotiations over a documentary about Fauci’s work. He first sent a note to his team about the project on April 12, a month after WHO had declared the coronavirus a pandemic.

Let us discuss this tomorrow before we do anything. No one has any ‘exclusives’ on anything about me,” he wrote to his team.”iv

It would seem from this email that the documentary is a priority to him, that he is self-important enough to concern himself with his image and portrayal. He makes it clear that it is of priority by insisting they discuss it the next day before anything else. This is hardly the reaction of one who wishes to shun cameras or media fanfare. He even comments, “No one has any ‘exclusive’ on anything about me.”

It is reminiscent of Gandhi, who the author of this book co-penned a book about called “Gandhi Under Cross-examination.” Gandhi, who is the same kind of duplicitous double-dealing fraud as Fauci, actually asked his own biographer, Rev. J.J. Doke if he wished him to write part of the biography about him. This is not only a conflict of interest, but shows that Gandhi and Doke are close friends, and Doke’s biography is not written with the objectivity required of a professional biography. In addiction, Gandhi paid for 600 copies of the biography to be printed and then had them sent to major news publications in Europe and North America. This is hardly the image we expect from the prophetic figure Gandhi cut in his loin cloth and staff. Is Fauci the same kind of closet narcissist as Gandhi? Time will tell. It is well known that psychopathic personalities often have narcistic personality disorders.

Fauci’s email below, in reply to one Ms. Allantha Angel, is highly revealing. In the email, Fauci admits that cases of CoViD-19 are heavily skewed by being associated mainly with a high percentage of elderly patients, in addition to co-morbidity factors such as heart disease, chronic lung disease, kidney disease, diabetes, etc. He also admits that most of the pneumonias are what he refers to as “pure viral pneumonias.” In such cases, he admits “and so this vaccine will not help that.” That is an open admission that the CoViD-19 vaccine will be of no benefit and serve no useful purpose for most of the pneumonias encountered. That being the case, why is it being rolled out and universally prescribed as the treatment of choice for defending against CoViD-19 infection, when even Fauci admits it has no efficacy against most of the pneumonias encountered by medical staff?

Image is Available in PDF Format

Anthony Fauci has long been connected to the U.S. government’s bioweapons program. He is a well-trained agent posing as the head of a national health agency. He is a master of Hegelian problem-reaction-solution-dialectics. He is at the heart of the problem, since he was the staunchest promoter of the dual-purpose gain-of-function technology used to create bioweapons like SARS and SARS-CoV-2 in the first place. He has been in charge throughout the reaction phase, with his promotion of mask-wearing, social distancing, lockdowns, mask-wearing, sanitizing, and all the other repressive measures imposed on us by unelected health tsars like himself. He is also at the forefront of the so-called solution—CoViD-19 vaccines—which are no solution at all, but have only exacerbated the problem by creating new variants, prolonging rather than truncating the timeline of the pandemic, while spawning an autoimmune disease response due to the experimental, never before tested mRNA vaccines, which program cells to manufacture spike proteins resembling those found on the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself. Ivermectin is the solution, but the genocidal mad scientists in charge like Fauci, do not want to promote the real solutions, since the fake ones are far more efficient at achieving their population reduction targets, which it is the main purpose of this entire criminal conspiracy.

Fauci defended controversial “gain-of-function” research in 2012, and said the research was worth the risk, even if it precipitated a pandemic.

In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?” Fauci wrote in an article in the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012, “Scientists working in this field might say—as indeed I have said—that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.”

Gain-of-function research involves extracting natural virus samples from animals and engineering them to infect humans ostensibly for the purpose of developing therapeutics and vaccines. However, the approach can be used as a cover or smokescreen for more offensive bioweapon development purposes. It’s too tempting to engage in this form of study and not take advantage of the dual-purpose applications. An even more cynical view would hold that the defensive research is a pretext or cover for the more offensive application.

This stunning revelation comes on the heels of researchers raising new questions about the origins of the CoViD-19 virus. It also comes after Dr. Fauci’s recent admission that the NIH sent $600,000 to the WIV for research into the transmissibility of bat coronaviruses to humans, and his recent concession that CoViD-19 may have leaked from a lab when he obstinately adhered to the view that it was natural for over a year. Even Facebook recently made a surprising reversal of policy by discontinuing the practice of banning posts suggesting that CoViD-19 may have originated in a Chinese laboratory. A House GOP report also found that “significant circumstantial evidence raises serious concerns that the CoViD-19 outbreak may have been a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” and that Fauci’s NIAID funded work there, indirectly through the sub-grant agency EcoHealth Alliance that “appeared to directly or indirectly involve controversial ‘gain of function’ research.”

Gain-of-function research is not only controversial, but two years after Fauci defended it, the Obama administration imposed a moratorium on all gain-of-function research within the U.S., finding it to be too dangerous. However, Fauci, slippery as a greased eel, found a loophole and used NIH grant money to fund gain-of-function research at WIV.v

Fauci may have been directly involved in funding the research that ultimately caused the CoViD-19 pandemic. This chapter will make a case for Fauci, like billionaire Bill Gates, employing Hegelian problem-reaction-solution dialectics to create the problem—the bioweaponized virus—which caused the reaction—a global plandemic-which requires the solution—the introduction of an experimental gene therapy misnamed a “vaccine” designed to eliminate the weak, while achieving the transhumanist metamorphosis of the human race for those who survive.

The 2015 publication of a gain-of-function study that appeared in the journal Nature that details the creation of a chimeric virus certainly raises questions that need answers, but that paper will be analyzed in depth later. However, the researchers made a huge omission that becomes all the more alarming considering the purpose gain-of-function research is meant to serve.

Back in 2012, Fauci encouraged his fellow scientists to engage in gain-of-function research, claiming it was worth the risk. The theory behind such research is that researchers can create close approximations of viruses that may emerge from nature through gain-of-function research. Then, scientists can devise treatments that target likely genetic or protein targets on the chimeric virus. Researchers can then compare a virus’s genetic code to previous viruses that emerged naturally and chimeric viruses created through gain-of-function research. Should a new pathogenic virus emerge from nature, the hope is that they will be able to pre-emptively hold the advantage.

Researchers hope to find common genetic or protein targets in a virus that can be cured by a therapeutic or a vaccine that the scientists hope to develop before an actual outbreak. The argument for justifying such risky gain-of-function research is persuasive, but what if the research were to be hijacked for nefarious purposes, including the development of bioweapons? Without stringent and globally agreed-upon limitations and reporting requirements with the force of international law, one could conclude in contradistinction to Fauci that the risks far outweigh the benefits.

There must be a repository for the relevant information on documented viruses to compare with a newly-discovered one. This tool is a system of cooperative databases that update each other from around the world. The U.S. version is called GenBank. The problem with the 2015 chimeric virus is that, according to an author correction on the 2015 study, published on May 22, 2020, researchers never uploaded the virus information to GenBank:

In the version of this article initially published, the sequence of the mouse adapted SHC015-MA15 virus had not been deposited in GenBank. The sequence has now been deposited in GenBank under accession number MT308984.

If the team made the correction close to the note’s date, that is approximately five years after they created the virus in 2014. This correction seems even more notable when one takes into account the developmental timeline. Following the release of the 2015, an editor’s note appeared by the date March 30, 2020:

30 March 2020 Editors’ note, March 2020: We are aware that this article is being used as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus causing CoViD-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus.

We now know from Dr. Fauci’s emails that officials within the NIH were calling into question the natural outbreak theory and were questioning whether the virus might have had artificial lab origins. It is also apparent that some researchers were warning Fauci of their fears that the virus was manmade. When a FOIA requested the disclosure of Fauci’s emails, authorities redacted most of the contents of an email related to a sensitive conference call, in which the 2015 study may well have been the focus of discussion. The editing of the study appeared following the conference call. It is also uncertain whether researchers actually uploaded information about the virus created in the study to GenBank for the purpose of drawing comparisons between it and CoViD-19 at the time.

A flurry of articles came out to immediately debunk the lab-leak theory. Why the attempt to discredit with such unseemly haste. Methinks they doth protest too much. The naïve public never seems to consider the mercurial speed with which the naysayers turn out these articles aimed at completely discrediting the entirely plausible. Nicholas Wade, a former science reporter for The New York Timespointed out how conflicted and baseless the most influential articles were as such paid government shills are wont to do. Is this mocker one of the CIA’s mockingbirds? Would you be surprised? One article of the debunking stripe, and published by The Lancet, listed Peter Daszak from EcoHealth Alliance as an author. He funded research at WIV, including the 2015 study, yet denied any conflict of interest. However, there is strong evidence of such a conflict, as will be shown.

Another influential letter included Kristian G. Andersen of the Scripps Research Institute, who had been on copy in some of Fauci’s e-mails that referenced the study. The letter asserted that there was no evidence CoViD-19 was engineered. Wade explained there was also no evidence that it was not:

Unfortunately, this was another case of poor science, in the sense defined above. True, some older methods of cutting and pasting viral genomes retain tell-tale signs of manipulation. But newer methods, called “no-see-um” or “seamless” approaches, leave no defining marks. Nor do other methods for manipulating viruses such as serial passage, the repeated transfer of viruses from one culture of cells to another. If a virus has been manipulated, whether with a seamless method or by serial passage, there is no way of knowing that this is the case. Dr. Andersen and his colleagues were assuring their readers of something they could not know.

After the successful cross-species transmission into mice, which caused significant lung damage according to the 2015 study, Dr. Xie Zhengli decided to research the effects on primates. Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, noted that the researchers created a novel virus that “grows remarkably well” in human cells. “If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory,” he said.

Xie’s research proceeded and, in November 2018, she spoke at the School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology at Shanghai Jiao Tong University on the topic of “Studies on Bat Coronavirus and Cross-Species Infection.” The school later deleted reports about the event from the university’s website. There would be no reason for the school to do this unless it or someone important felt that the matter was sensitive and had to be hushed up.

All of these disclosures paint a very troubling picture of something quite untoward going on behind the scenes. One would have to be very naive to believe that the GenBank data for the 2015 chimeric virus is accurate, given the study was the subject of scrutiny at the time researchers took pains to add it to the databank. Add to that a bombshell report that members of the U.S. State Department tried to block an investigation of the origins of CoViD-19 because it “could open a can of worms” and one has all the circumstantial evidence one needs to show that a cover-up has taken

As for Daszak’s denial of any conflict of interest in EcoHealth Alliance funding research at WIV, his email to Fauci in 2017 would beg to differ. In this highly revealing email, he outlined his collaborative research on a “bat-origin coronavirus” with the WIV’s Xie Zhengli, which included “doing assays to find out if it can infect human cells in the lab.”

Daszak titled the October 2017 email, “Confidential—A new bat-origin coronavirus emerging in pigs in China discovered under our NIAID R01.” Daszak is referencing a $3.7 million grant from Fauci’s NIAID to the organization EcoHealth Alliance with the declared purpose of “understanding the risk of bat coronavirus emergence.” This kind of research cannot be done without gain-of-function applications, as it is only through such research that it becomes possible to experiment with the variables involved in a virus making the evolutionary advance, which enabled it to jump the species barrier. This grant likely led to “gain-of-function” research collaboration with WIV, which is well-known to have ties to the Chinese military. Fauci, Daszak, the NIH and NIAID had to know of such military links. There is no possible way they could not have. Fauci said in one interview that it would have been irresponsible not to do research of these bat viruses, when it was the height of irresponsibility to do such research with an enemy government. Anyone suggesting that it is xenophobic to see China as an enemy of the U.S. would totally on board with critical race theory (CRT) and political correctness, which is ideologically part and parcel of this entire international communist coup orchestrated by corrupt governments colluding with the CCP.

In the email to Fauci and his NIAID colleagues, Daszak, who was recently recused from the Lancet’s CoViD-19 commission, having been judged as unqualified to perform legal duties because of a potential conflict of interest or lack of impartiality, attaches an unpublished paper on a “novel bat-origin Coronavirus” that’s “not known to be zoonotic.”

We’re also doing assays to find out if it can infect human cells in the lab—so far no evidence of this,” he adds before listing Wuhan researcher Xie Zhengli as a co-Principal Investigator. Not only does this completely negate Fauci’s past attempts to distance his agency both financially and via personnel to the WIV, but it proves gain-of-function research was taking place at WIV, another claim Fauci has repeatedly denied.

Daszak also reveals that he met Fauci “again” on the day he sent the email—October 1, 2017—which just happened to coincide with the opening day of a conference on “Emerging and Re-emerging Viruses.” Fauci delivered the keynote address at the event, where both Daszak and Xie also happened to give public addresses.vii

The text of the email reads as follows:

Dear Dr Fauci and NIAID colleagues,

It was a pleasure to meet you again today. I’ve attached an unpublished paper, currently in the second round of review with Nature that describes a novel bat-origin Coronavirus (SADS-CoV: Swine Acute Diarrhea) Syndrome coronavirus) that recently spilled over into pig farms in Southern China, leading to the death of over 25,000 piglets in 5+ farms in Guandong Province.

The virus originates in the same group of bats as SARS-CoV, and emerged in the same place. It’s not known to be zoonotic (we’ve tested 35+ pig farm workers with an antibody assay and none are positive. The pig farm owners tell us the virus is now under control, thanks to culling and separation of infected herds. It’s not yet known if this virus has appeared elsewhere, but we are looking. We’re also doing assays to find out if it can infect human cells in the lab—so far no evidence of this.

I hope this paper is of interest. You should know that this work was supported by a NIAID RO1 that Erik Stem my is the Program Officer for, and that I’m PI on, with Zhengli Shi as co-PI.

If you want any other information at all, please don’t hesitate to email or call and I’d be happy to come over to NIAID to brief you further. I’ll also let you know if/when it will be published so that we can try to foster some publicity as appropriate.

Peter Daszakviii

Daszak’s references in the email prove that Fauci lied to Sen. Rand Paul under oath about his involvement in illegal gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses. Fauci has repeatedly attempted to distance himself from claims that any such research had taken place, feigning ignorance about whatever untoward study might have been going on behind closed doors at WIV. Fauci also says he never sent a penny of American taxpayer money to WIV, which has also been exposed as a blatant and patent lie. Based on the contents of the email, we also now know that Fauci met up with Daszak the same day as the email was sent, which also just happened to coincide with the opening day of a conference on “Emerging and Re-emerging Viruses,” at which Fauci delivered the keynote address. No wonder these viruses keep popping up like a bad penny. The author behind them keeps popping up as the proverbial penny himself, over four administrations in fact, as he likes to boast in his keynote addresses. This is because Deep State agents are so entrenched, the power positions they hold allow them to hang on for a lifetime.

Daszak and Xie also spoke at the gathering, suggesting that they were all not only totally cognizant of was going on, including Fauci, but were in collusion together in the creation of Frankenstein’s chimera monster from the very outset. There is simply no way that Fauci could have been in the dark about the type of research taking place at WIV. In fact, the responsibility for this entire pandemic can be laid right at Fauci’s feet. Had Fauci not funded illegal gain-of-function research, there never would have been a bat coronavirus capable of jumping the species barrier to humans, which means that Fauci is guilty of an array of high crimes biblical in their magnitude, which may account for why the name Fauci in the Sicilian dialect means ‘sickle’, suggesting that he is one of the four horseman of the Apocalypse—Death—bearing the tool of his harvest.

Daszak is likewise complicit, though he would not have been able to conduct his Frankenstein-like chimera experiments were it not for the funding he received at the hands of Fauci. Daszak never disclosed his financial conflicts of interest, which is why he was recused from The Lancet’s CoViD-19 commission. Both Fauci and Daszak are criminals guilty of high crimes for which the full weight of the law should be exercised. Neither of them can be allowed to get away with the crimes of treason, embezzlement, fraud, mass murder and crimes against humanity.ix

On June 21, 2021, the medical journal The Lancet, which published the March 2020 letter from 27 scientists decrying the “lab leak” of CoViD-19 as a xenophobic conspiracy theory, issued an update acknowledging that Peter Daszak, the scientist who organized the publication of the letter, failed to disclose his clear conflict of interest as is required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. This is solid evidence the EcoHealth Alliance is using Daszak in a desperate bid to conceal its role in funding the gain-of-function research at WIV. Fauci is lying. Daszak is a liar. And EcoHealth’s management has committed a series of crimes, not least fraud, high treason, and crimes against humanity.

In this letter,” The Lancet update states, “the authors declared no competing interests. Some readers have questioned the validity of this disclosure, particularly as it relates to one of the authors, Peter Daszak.”

The Lancet also invited all 27 scientists who signed onto the letter to re-evaluate their competing interests. After it did so, Daszak submitted an updated disclosure statement acknowledging the fact that his sole source of income is from the salary he receives from EcoHealth Alliance. No conflict of interests to worry about there, since EcoHealth Alliance was the sub-grant agency of the NIH that was funding WIV’s research on coronaviruses, including gain-of-function research. Daszak has understandably since been removed from The Lancet’s CoViD-19 commission.x

In a Senate hearing, Fauci told lawmakers the U.S. had granted $600,000 in funding to WIV over a five-year period, but documents provided by the DHHS show the true number was a third higher than that. Reports obtained by Judicial Watch, found that, between 2014 and 2019, $826,277 was provided by the NIH and NIAID under Fauci’s directive to the Wuhan lab.

Under hardline senate hearing grilling by Republicans, the infectious disease Fauci admitted that the NIH, under whose authority the NIAID operates, provided $600,000 to WIV for studies on the bat coronavirus.

The documents reveal that funds were provided over a six-year period for “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” by the NIAID through the non-profit EcoHealth Alliance.

Emails obtained through the FOIA show top NIAID officials Dr. Emily Erbelding, Dr. Cristina Cassetti, and Principal Deputy Director Hugh Auchincloss communicated about plans to fund the WIV over a six-year period, which began back in 2019.

The grant was again provided by Peter Daszak, president of the New York City-based EcoHealth Alliance, to the tune of $750,000, $76,301 of which had been issued in 2019.

This is higher but not extraordinarily higher than I originally indicated,” Auchincloss said in an April 13, 2020 email to Fauci. The communication regarding the EcoHealth Alliance funding indicates that the top disease specialist was aware of the grants provided to the WIV.

An email two days later marked “high” importance from the Principal Deputy Director of NIH Lawrence Tabak to Fauci, along with other NIH officials, warned that Republicans in the Senate were fuming about taxpayer dollars being diverted to fund gain-of-function research at WIV.

The email was given the subject line, “HEADS UP: Wuhan lab research.”

Many congressional Republicans believe the virus was leaked from WIV, resulting in a global pandemic, a theory now given more weight after President Biden’s recent call for an investigation into the origins of the virus. ‘Leak’ makes it sound like an accident, but it is quite deliberate, planned in advance over many years, and intended to evolve into the worldwide scourge it has become.

Rand Paul recently interrogated Fauci on his role in the authorship and release of the SARS-CoV-2 bioweapon. The interrogation was spirited and Paul did his best to circle the wagons on Fauci in the interview, but like most psychopaths, Fauci was unflappable and unmoved even at the most heated moments of the interrogation, being devoid of emotion or empathy, while being well-trained in the art of obfuscation, deflection, and concealment. The simple fact is that he is a well-trained deep cover Deep State agent, who was handpicked to be the last on the suspect list simply because he is in charge of the U.S. government’s response to the plague of the millennium. Who would have ever thought it would be him? Who would have ever believed it possible? However, Rand Paul’s undisputable facts, presented in the course of interrogation, make it clear that a transfer of funds was made to fund gain-of-function research at WIV.

Sen. Rand Paul: Dr. Fauci, we don’t know whether the pandemic started in a lab in Wuhan or evolved naturally, but we should want to know. Three million people have died from this pandemic and that should cause us to explore all possibilities. Instead, government authorities, self-interested gain-of-function research say there’s nothing to see here. Gain-of-function research, as you know, is juicing up naturally occurring animal viruses to infect humans. To arrive at the truth, the U.S. government should admit that the Wuhan virology institute was experimenting to enhance the coronavirus’s ability to infect humans. Juicing up superviruses is not new. Scientists in the U.S. have long known how to mutate animal viruses to infect humans. For years, Dr. Ralph Baric, a virologist in the U.S. has been collaborating with Dr. Xie Zhengli of the Wuhan virology institute, sharing his discoveries about how to create superviruses. This gain-of-function research has been funded by the NIH. The collaboration between the U.S. and the Wuhan virology institute continues. Drs. Baric and Xie worked together to insert bat virus spike protein into the backbone of the deadly SARS virus. And then used this manmade supervirus to infect human airway cells. Think about that for a moment. The SARS virus had a 15% mortality. We’re fighting a pandemic that has about a 1% mortality. Can you imagine if a SARS virus that’s been juiced up, and had viral proteins added to it to the spike protein, if that were released accidentally?

Dr. Fauci, do you still support funding of the NIH funding of the lab in Wuhan?

Dr. Fauci: Sen. Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect that the NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Sen. Rand Paul: Do they fund Dr. Baric?

Dr. Fauci: We do not fund gain-of-function…

Sen. Rand Paul: Do you fund Dr. Baric’s research?

Dr. Fauci: Dr. Baric is not doing gain-of-function research, and if it is, it is according to the guidelines, and it is being conducted in North Carolina and not…

Sen. Rand Paul: You don’t think the bat virus spike protein that he got from the Wuhan lab institute [and inserted] into the SARS virus is gain-of-function?

Dr. Fauci: It is not…

Sen Rand Paul: You would be in the minority because at least three other scientists have signed a statement from the Cambridge Working Group saying that it is gain of function.

Dr. Fauci: Well, it is not. And if you look at the grant, and you look at the progress reports, it is not gain-of-function, despite the fact that people tweet that…

Sen. Rand Paul: So do you still support sending money to the Wuhan virology institute?

Dr, Fauci: We do not now send money to the Wuhan virology…

Sen. Rand Paul: Do you support sending money? We did, under your tutelage; we were sending money, sending it through EcoHealth—it was a sub-agency and sub-grant. Do you support that the money from NIH was going to the Wuhan institute?

Dr. Fauci: Let me explain to you why that was done. The SARS-CoV-1 originated in bats in China. It would have been irresponsible of us if we did not investigate the bat viruses and the serology to see who might have been infected.

Sen. Rand Paul: Or perhaps it would be possible to send it to the Chinese government that we might not be able to trust with this knowledge and with this incredibly dangerous virus. Government scientists like yourself, who favor this gain-of-function research…

Dr. Fauci: I don’t favor gain-of-function research in China. You are saying things that are not correct.

Sen Rand Paul: Government defenders of gain-of-function, such as yourself, say that CoViD-19 mutations were random and not designed by man, but interestingly the technique that Dr. Baric developed forces mutations by serial passage through cell culture so that the mutations appear to be natural. In fact, Dr. Baric named the technique the no-see-it technique because the mutations appear naturally.

Nicholas Baker, of New York Magazine, said, “No one would know if the virus had been fabricated in a laboratory or grown in nature. Government authorities in the U.S., including yourself, unequivocally deny that CoViD-19 could have escaped a lab, but even Dr. Xie in Wuhan wasn’t so sure. According to Nicholas Baker. Dr. Xie wondered, ‘Could this new virus have come from her own laboratory?’ She checked her records frantically and found no matches. “That really took a load off my mind,” she said. “I had not slept for days.”

The director of the gain-of-function research at Wuhan couldn’t sleep because she was terrified that it might be in her lab. Dr. Baric, an advocate of gain-of-function research, admits, “The main problem with the institute of virology is that the outbreak occurred in close proximity. What are the odds?” Baric responded, “Could you rule out a laboratory escape? The answer in this case is probably not.”

Will you in front of this group categorically say that the CoViD-19 could not have occurred through serial passage in a laboratory?

Dr. Fauci: I do not have any accounting of what the Chinese may have done, and I am fully in favor of any further investigation of what went on in China. However, I will repeat again, the NIH and NIAID categorically has not funded gain-of-function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Sen Rand Paul: You do support it in the U.S. We have eleven labs doing it, and you have allowed it here. We have a committee to do it here. The committee is granted every exemption. You’re fooling with Mother Nature here. You’re allowing superviruses to be created with a 15% mortality. It’s very dangerous, and it’s a huge mistake to share this with China, and it’s a huge mistake to allow this to continue in the United States, And we should be very careful to investigate where this virus came from.

Dr. Fauci: I fully agree that you should investigate where the virus came from, but again, we have not funded gain-of-function research on this virus at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. No matter how many times you say it, it didn’t happen.

Sen. Rand Paul: There was research done with Dr. Xie and Dr. Baric. They have collaborated on gain-of-function research, where they had enhanced the SARS virus to infect human airway cells. And they did it by merging a new spike protein on it. That is gain of function. That is joint research between the Wuhan institute and Dr. Baric. You can’t deny it.

Chair: Sen. Paul, your time has expired. Dr. Fauci, I will let you respond to that. We need to move on.

Dr. Fauci: Excuse me?

Chair: I will allow you to respond to that, and then we’ll move on.

Dr. Fauci: Yeah, I mean I just wanted to say, I don’t know how many times I can say it, Madam Chair, we did not fund gain-of-function research to be conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.xi

There are some concerning statements made by Dr. Fauci in this interview that need to be examined.

In a follow up interview, Fauci offered a more comprehensive explanation:

Dr. Fauci: We had a big scare with SARS-CoViD-1 back in 2002-2003, where that particular virus unquestionably went from a bat to an intermediate host to start an epidemic and a pandemic that resulted in 8,000 cases and close to 800 deaths. It would have been almost a dereliction of our duty if we didn’t study this. And the only way you could study these things is you’ve got to go where the action is. So I often say somewhat tongue in cheek, ‘You don’t want to study bats in Fairfax County, Virginia to find out what the animal-human interface is that might lead to a jumping of species. So we had a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists, who were world experts on coronavirus. And we did that through a sub-grant from a larger grant to EcoHealth. The sub-grant was about $600,000 over a period of five years. So it was a modest amount. And the purpose of it was to study the animal-human interface to do surveillance, and to determine if these bat viruses were even capable of transmitting infection to humans.xii

During a Senate Appropriations hearing on the NIH budget, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) questioned Dr. Fauci about NIH funding of gain-of-function research in China and whether China lied about the research being conducted at WIV. If the lies and obfuscations made by Fauci in his senate hearing interrogations by Rand Paul were not enough to raise one’s hackles and cause one to question the narrative, then perhaps Senator Kennedy’s interrogation of the good doctor might elicit more questions in one’s mind.

Senator Kennedy: Madame Chairwoman. Uh Dr. Fauci, I believe you have testified that, uh, that uh, you didn’t give any money to the Wuhan lab to conduct gain-of-function research, is that right?

Dr. Fauci: That is correct.

Senator Kennedy: How do you know they didn’t lie to you?

Dr. Fauci: Excuse me, sir?

Senator Kennedy: How do you know they didn’t lie to you and use the money for gain-of-function research anyway?

Dr. Fauci: Well, we’ve seen the results of the experiments that were done, and that were published and the viruses that they, um, studied are all on public databases now. So, none of that was gain-of-function, and so…

Senator Kennedy: How do you know they didn’t do the research, and uh, not put it on their website?

Dr. Fauci: There’s no way of guaranteeing that, but in our experience with grantees, including Chinese grantees, which we’ve had interactions with for a very long period of time, they’re very competent, trustworthy scientists. I’m not talking about anything else in China. I’m talking about the scientists, that you would expect that they would abide by the conditions of the grant, which they’ve done for the years that we’ve had interactions with them.

Senator Kennedy: So, you don’t think the Chinese would lie to you?

Dr. Fauci: Well, when you say the Chinese, the Chinese are a rather broad group. I know the scientists that we’ve dealt with have been trustworthy.

Senator Kennedy: Um huh. You think all the scientists, uh, have told the truth in terms of the origin of the Wuhan virus and not been influenced by the communist party of China, do you?

Dr. Fauci: I don’t have enough insight into the communist party in China to know the interactions between them and the scientists there.

Senator Kennedy: Right? Why are we giving them money in the first place?

Dr. Fauci: Well, that’s a very good question, and thank you for the opportunity to answer it. Well, SARS-CoV-1 started in China, in Guangdong Province, and it went from a bat to a civic cat to a human.

Senator Kennedy: Yes, and excuse my Doc, for interrupting, but our time is so short.

Dr. Fauci: Yeah, I’m going to be really quick.

Senator Kennedy: Our time is so limited. Why are we giving money to the labs in China to study virology?

Dr. Fauci: Well, I’m going to give you a rather succinct answer to that, sir.

Senator Kennedy: I appreciate that.

Dr. Fauci: And that’s why I was saying the SARS-CoV-1—clearly the bats have the viruses that have the coronaviruses are in China. As I said a couple of times, it’s not in Fairfax County, Virginia, or is it in New York. It’s in China. So, if you want to show and study importantly the animal-human interface…

Senator Kennedy: So, that’s where the bats are?

Dr. Fauci: Yeah, the bats.

Senator Kennedy: I gotya. I want to be sure I understand your testimony. You didn’t give money to the Wuhan lab to do gain-of-function research.

Dr. Fauci: That is correct.

Senator Kennedy: And you believe they didn’t do gain-of-function research because they told you they didn’t.

Dr. Fauci: We’ve seen the results of the studies that they conducted and they were not…

Senator Kennedy: Including any private studies?

Dr. Fauci: Excuse me, including…?

Senator Kennedy: Any private studies.

Dr. Fauci: I’m not sure what you’re getting at, sir.

Senator Kennedy: Here’s what I’m getting at. You gave the money, and you said, ‘Don’t do gain-of-function research.

Dr. Fauci: Correct.

Senator Kennedy: And they said, ‘We won’t.’

Dr. Fauci: Correct.

Senator Kennedy: And you have no way of knowing whether they did or not except that you trust them. Is that right?

Dr. Fauci: Well, we generally trust the grantee to do what they say. And you look at the results…

Senator Kennedy: Have you ever had a grantee lie to you?

Dr. Fauci: I cannot guarantee that a grantee has not lied to us because you never know.

Senator Kennedy: Yeah. Can we agree if you took President Xi Jinping and turned him upside down and shook him, the World Health Organization would fall out of his pocket?

Dr. Fauci: (Chuckles) I don’t think I can answer that question, sir. I’m sorry.

Senator Kennedy: Well, do you think that President Xi Jinping has undue influence over the World Health Organization, do you?

Dr. Fauci: I have no way of knowing the influence of the Chinese President over the WHO.

Senator Kennedy: Okay, so you think that the WHO is a completely independent body, and level playing field, call it like you see it. And they really want to get to the bottom of the origin of the virus. Do you believe that?

Dr. Fauci: My interaction with the WHO and Dr. Tedros, the director-general, has been one, that I do believe he’s a person of a high degree of integrity.

Senator Kennedy: I got it. I wanna, I wanna ask one last question. Why did you guys spike—not guys—and ladies, why did you all spike the prior administration’s investigation into the origins of the coronavirus and whether it could have, uh, could have come out of the Wuhan lab?

Dr. Fauci: Sir, I, we did not spike anything in the prior administration. I’m not sure what you mean by spike. We have no influence…

Senator Kennedy: The State Department spiked the prior administration’s, uh, study.

Dr. Fauci: But that has nothing to do with the National Institutes of Health.

Senator Kennedy: They didn’t consult with ya’ll?

Dr. Fauci: They did not.

Senator Kennedy: Did they consult with you, Dr. Collins?

Dr. Francis S. Collins: I read about it in the press this morning.

Senator Kennedy: Doc, they just spiked it without talking to their experts?

Dr. Collins displays dumb obstinance.

Senator Kennedy: You don’t want to answer that one, do you?

Dr. Collins: (Laughs) I just read about it…

Senator Kennedy: Thank you, Madame Chair.xiii

Senator Johnson: Don’t exactly have a score on the grant programs would be contemplating here, but whatever the costs would be my memo would just simply fund those from the unobligated funds of the American rescue plan. It’s pretty simple, a pretty simple amendment. But while I have the floor here, I do want to speak to another issue that I think is important to this committee. Um, this committee is the Senate Oversight Committee. Now, when I was chair for six years, I know there was some support for investigations, some of my oversight, sometimes there wasn’t. But, when we have hearings on nominees, we ask them a question: whether or not they will comply with legitimate senate oversight requests. And they always say, Yes, and that’s also true of the health committee. Uh, five senators, uh, from this committee, uh, sent letters to the NIH and CDC, and then sent away to the CDC and HHS. And we invoked 5UFC2954, which states, “That executive AMC on request of the Committee of Homeland Security, where any five members thereof shall submit any information of or relating to any matter within the jurisdiction of this committee. Now again, this committee has broad oversight jurisdiction. Um, we have not gotten those oversight letters responded to, not effectively, not in a complete format. Um, Mr. Chairman, I sent you a letter, also signed by five senators, requesting you utilize this committee’s power to compel the agencies to follow the law. They shall supply the information. Now, I just want to use one example, um, a letter we sent to HHS secretary Becerra requesting the unredacted emails from Anthony Fauci that were provided under a forwarding request to a number of different outside groups. We requested those same emails unredacted. By the way, congressional oversight is not subject to the redactions is not subject to the redactions under FOIA. We should have received those unredacted. Um, proof of the fact that the redactions are not valid, I just have copies of one of the emails. This is an email from Peter Daszak dated April 18, and it’s just thanking Anthony Fauci for basically covering for EcoHealth Alliance. You can see from what was produced to the committee, and in the FOIA request, we have a big redaction here.

Image is Available in PDF Format

Fauci email received from EcoAlliance head, Peter Daszac.

And it was redacted supposedly because it was related to an open law enforcement investigation. We basically got the same 4,000 pages, the five senators, uh, except that on this one email, they failed to redact it, so now we know what’s under the redaction. Let me just read you, what was supposedly related to an open investigation. It says, “It has been a very hard few months, as these conspiracy theorists have gradually become politicized and hardened in their stance, especially because the work we’ve been doing in collaboration with Chinese virologists have given us incredible into the risks that these viruses represent, so we can directly help protect our nation from bat origin coronaviruses. We’re fighting to keep our communications open with our Chinese colleagues so that we can better address future pandemics like CoViD-19.”

I have no idea why that would be redacted in an oversight response to congress. I have no idea how that paragraph could be related to an open law enforcement investigation. So, I won’t describe this any further other than to again make the point: This law that we are invoking that requires…that tells these agencies they shall turn over this information—this is a one-hundred- year law—it’s been modified two times, most recently in 1994 signed by Bill Clinton. The supreme court has affirmed congress’s need to have information to write effective legislation. For too many years—and again I was the brunt of it for six years as the chairman of this committee—government agencies, regardless of the administration have thumbed their nose at congressional oversight. They just simply refuse to comply. So, we end up being completely ineffective in an incredibly important constitutional duty and responsibility of congress. Now again, there is no reason—they have the emails. All they have to do is provide them to the five centers that have requested them in an unredacted fashion. By the way our other oversight request is to CDC regarding any contact between the teachers’ unions and the CDC regarding their reopening of school guidance. Was that based on science or was that based on political pressure? I think the public has a right to know. So again, is the senate committee and oversight? If we sit back and do nothing, administrations in the future, regardless of whether they’re Republican or Democrat—whether Democrats are in the majority in the senate or Republicans are—administrations will continue to ignore our oversight requests, and we will not be able to fulfill our constitutional duty and responsibility to our constituents. So, I would hope that every member of this committee will join those five senators that joined me, and use this committee’s power to subpoena those records to say in a very strong unanimous voice congress will not be ignored. Our oversight responsibilities are important, and we demand, we insist that the administration provides us this information…xiv

Everything about the investigation of Fauci shows that he is a duplicitous liar, who seeks every sneaky avenue available to undertake his mad science. He is an unscrupulous psychopath with no moral compunction, who seems to derive pleasure from undertaking research that is as depraved, nefarious, and unethical as possible. For instance, a FOIA disclosure recently found that Fauci used U.S. taxpayer money to conduct inhumane experiments on dogs. Documents obtained by the White Coat Waste Project showed that the NIAID, an agency Fauci oversees, spent $424,000 to infest healthy beagles with flies that carried dangerous parasites.

Fauci’s experiments reportedly resulted in several dogs being infected by the parasites, with multiple dogs being bitten to death by flies. NIAID claimed those experiments were carried out to test the effectiveness of anti-parasitic drugs, despite ethical concerns. The few dogs that survived Fauci’s tests were later euthanized and disposed of. If Fauci is able to do this to an animal much beloved by fellow Americans, an animal long regarded as “man’s best friend,” what would stop him from flouting every ethical rule on the books to conduct experiments in germ warfare that could have implications for human populations.

The NIH website says they choose beagles because they’re small and docile, means they are easy to abuse,” explained Justin Goodman of White Coat Waste Project. “They took these 28 healthy beagles, infected them with parasites by, as they’ve done in the past, strapping devices that allow them to eat them alive basically, give them parasites and then they killed the dogs at the end of the study.”xv

White Coat Waste Project shocked the world when it first exposed how Fauci’s division at NIH shipped tax dollars to the WIV to conduct experiments, including extremely painful animal experiments. Fauci’s 2021 budget came to $6 billion in taxpayer funding and roughly half of that sum was wasted on animal experiments.

Image is Available in PDF Format

Beagle abused in experiments in an NIH lab run by Anthony Fauci. Photo obtained by WCW via FOIA.

According to recently obtained documents, Fauci’s NIAID spent $424,000 to commission a study in which healthy beagles are given an experimental drug, and then intentionally infested with flies that carry a disease-causing parasite that affects humans. Why would such experimentation be conducted unless the mad scientist in charge of the team wanted to develop disease-causing parasites that affect humans? Claims that it is not gain-of-function research do not wash. Fauci is a criminal who is deliberately trying to conduct research, which has been banned in the U.S., in China. Worse than that is the fact that such research knowhow is being shared with scientists working with an enemy power. People are afraid of saying this because of the ludicrous and hypocritical ‘Woke’ movement and PC culture in the Western society, but the truth has to be stated. China cannot be trusted with this technology and if anyone thinks it can, that person is a fool and should be called out for being so.

Image is Available in PDF Format

Records show that the dogs were “vocalizing in pain” during the experiments. In other words, the poor animals were whimpering and whining in agony, which for humans would equate to screaming in pain. This is nothing short of a death camp for animals.

Image is Available in PDF Format

At the end of the long drawn-out and torturous experiments, the dogs will all be killed. Experimenters involved in the tests have admitted that the drug being tested, “has been extensively tested and confirmed…in different animal models such as mice…Mongolian gerbils…and rhesus macaques….” There’s literally no excuse for Fauci to waste more than $400,000 of your tax dollars on abusing these canines in these unnecessary lab experiments.

Image is Available in PDF Format

Building 567 was where Frank Rosetti and Judy Makovits conducted lab work. Bio-Safety Level 3 lab was on the corner of the third floor. The large ball structure known as the “eight-ball” partially visible behind the building is where they gassed animals with chemical and biological agents. Behind the eight-ball was the building where they tested anthrax, according to Judy.xvi

These aren’t the only depraved experiments on dogs Fauci was responsible for funding. In 2016, WCW exposed how his NIH division was using tax dollars to buy beagle puppies and strapping capsules full of infected flies to their bare skin.

Image is Available in PDF Format

The eight-ball where they once gassed animals with chemical and biological agents is now listed as a historic landmark and cannot be torn down.xvii

Below is an actual photo from the lab where the animal experimentation was taking place.xviii

Image is Available in PDF Format

Beagles strapped with capsules filled with infected fleas in experiments in an NIH lab run by Fauci. Photo obtained by WCW via FOIA.

Denials by Fauci that the NIH’s sub-grant agency EcoHealth Alliance was not funding gain-of-function research is an obvious lie. Why the need for the sub-grant agency to send the money to WIV if there is nothing to hide? Clearly, there was a need to hide something, if the NIH in its wisdom, selected a sub-grant agency with the intention of sending the money directly rather than indirectly to make it more difficult to ascertain the true source of the funding. In addition, we have the article co-authored by batlady Xie Zhengli and Ralph Baric et al., outlining the gain-of-function research they were conducting at WIV. Just look at the abstract of the paper which outlines the nature of their gain-of-function research so clearly:

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV underscores the threat of cross-species transmission events leading to outbreaks in humans. Here we examine the disease potential of a SARS-like virus, SHC014-CoV, which is currently circulating in Chinese horseshoe bat populations1. Using the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system2, we generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. The results indicate that group 2b viruses encoding the SHC014 spike in a wild-type backbone can efficiently use multiple orthologs of the SARS receptor human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2), replicate efficiently in primary human airway cells and achieve in vitro titers equivalent to epidemic strains of SARS-CoV. Additionally, in vivo experiments demonstrate replication of the chimeric virus in mouse lung with notable pathogenesis. Evaluation of available SARS-based immune-therapeutic and prophylactic modalities revealed poor efficacy; both monoclonal antibody and vaccine approaches failed to neutralize and protect from infection with CoVs using the novel spike protein. On the basis of these findings, we synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo. Our work suggests a potential risk of SARS-CoV re-emergence from viruses currently circulating in bat populations.xix

The gain-of-function research is undeniable. As the authors of the paper make explicitly clear, they created a chimera virus, in a laboratory setting, by inserting a spike protein zoonotic CoV spike protein from the RsSHC014-CoV sequence, isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats, onto the SARS-CoV mouse-adapted backbone, for the purpose of evaluating the potential of bat coronaviruses to infect humans. This is how the authors of the study put it in their own words:

Although public health measures were able to stop the SARS-CoV outbreak, recent metagenomics studies have identified sequences of closely related SARS-like viruses circulating in Chinese bat populations that may pose a future threat. However, sequence data alone provides minimal insights to identify and prepare for future prepandemic viruses. Therefore, to examine the emergence potential (that is, the potential to infect humans) of circulating bat CoVs, we built a chimeric virus encoding a novel, zoonotic CoV spike protein—from the RsSHC014-CoV sequence that was isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats—in the context of the SARS-CoV mouse-adapted backbone.xx

Gain-of-function of function research can no longer be denied. Fauci is a bold-faced liar. Gain-of-function applications of bat coronaviruses was being conducted at WIV. Sen. Rand Paul was exactly right that Dr. Xie Zhengli and Ralph Baric collaborated with their team on creating a chimeric virus that exactly matches the SARS-CoV-2 virus affecting the human population. The fact that Fauci’s NIH funded this research indirectly through a sub-grant agency proves that efforts were being made to hide the source of funding, which means that those involved knew that what they were funding was nefarious and in breach of international law. This makes all those involved, criminals, including and especially, Fauci. The title “doctor” will be dispensed with as much as possible in reference to this man as well as Xie, as the word “doctor” comes from the Latin and means “teacher”. What are they teaching us? How to violate every code of human decency and ethics, break most of the Ten Commandments, violate international law, commit genocide and crimes against humanity on an unfathomable scale worldwide? Thanks, but if it’s all the same to you, Fauci and Xie, we’d rather not fall under your tutelage and be taught anything by you.

Looking at what the authors of the study say next makes explicit the fact that, not only did this study involve a Frankenstein-like experiment to create a viral chimera in a lab, but clearly alludes to experimentation to discern its pathogenicity:

The hybrid virus allowed us to evaluate the ability of the novel spike protein to cause disease independently of other necessary adaptive mutations in its natural backbone. Using this approach, we characterized CoV infection mediated by the SHC014 spike protein in primary human airway cells and in vivo, and tested the efficacy of available immune therapeutics against SHC014-CoV. Together, the strategy translates metagenomics data to help predict and prepare for future emergent viruses.xxi

Just to be clear in vivo gene therapy means that therapy is administered directly to the patient. The targeted cells remain in the body of the patient. With ex vivo gene/cell therapy, the targeted cells are removed from the patient and gene therapy is administered to the cells in vitro before they are returned to the patient’s body. This would suggest that patients were being experimented upon directly as part of the study, and that they were being infected with a virus with like or identical properties to SARS-CoV-2—whether with or without their knowledge and consent is not known—for the purpose of studying the path and nature of infection, and to experiment with existing medical therapies to ascertain the effectiveness of what the study authors call “available immune therapeutics.”

Certainly, experiments were conducted on mice to see how they reacted to exposure to the dangerous pathogen:

To evaluate the role of the SHC014 spike in mediating infection in vivo, we infected 10-week-old mice with plaque-forming properties of either SARS-MA15 or SHC014-MA15. Animals infected with SARS-MA15 experienced rapid weight loss and lethality; in contrast, SHC014-MA15 infection produced substantial weight loss (10%) but no lethality in mice. Examination of viral replication revealed nearly equivalent viral titers—the lowest concentration of a virus that still infects cells—from the lungs of mice infected with SARS-MA15 or SHC014-MA15. Whereas lungs from the SARS-MA15–infected mice showed substantial staining in both the terminal bronchioles and the lung parenchyma, those of SHC014-MA15–infected mice showed reduced airway antigen staining; in contrast, no deficit in antigen staining was observed in the parenchyma or in the overall histology scoring, suggesting differential infection of lung tissue for SHC014-MA15. We next analyzed infection in more susceptible, aged (12-month-old) animals. SARS-MA15–infected animals rapidly lost weight and succumbed to infection. SHC014-MA15 infection induced robust and sustained weight loss, but had minimal lethality. Together, the data indicate that viruses with the SHC014 spike are capable of inducing weight loss in mice in the context of a virulent CoV backbone.xxii This experimentation on juvenile and geriatric mice must have been done with a purpose. When the UN and affiliated world government bodies are constantly emphasizing the fact that the global population is too high and must be reduced, and that we have exceeded the planet’s carrying capacity, it is self-evidence that seniors, the superannuated, the elderly, whatever you wish to call them, are unwanted. Therefore, the effect of the virus on geriatric mice must have been done for the described purpose of testing lethality rates for certain strains of the virus on older mice to study how it might affect a similar population of humans.

The scientists noted that some of the SARS-CoV strains were unable to bind to the human ACE2, the receptor for SARS-CoV. The authors further claim that the SHC014 spike protein was unable to bind human ACE2, but noted that similar changes in related SARS-CoV strains did allow for ACE2 binding, “suggesting that additional functional testing was required for verification.” They then admit synthesizing the SHC014 spike with “the replication-competent, mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone” in order “to maximize the opportunity for pathogenesis and vaccine studies in mice.”xxiii

This is exactly what gain-of-function research consists of in a nutshell, so there is no chance of denying it took place or that WIV was not conducting gain-of-function research. Claims by Fauci that the funding was not for that purpose is simply a lie. No amount of obfuscation or denials by slippery characters like Fauci can obsolve them of their complicity in this criminal operation. Fauci cannot wash the blood from his hands no matter how many times he shouts, “Out damn spot!” There is no longer any sense in denying gain-of-function research was being conducted at WIV.

Another objection and reply to objection that should be made in the course of defending this dissertation is that any allegation of xenophobic conspiracy theory being made against this information can be discounted by simply examining the list of authors involved in this study that had to be privy to whatever lab testing was being conducted at WIV: Vineet D. Menachery, Boyd L Yount Jr.Kari DebbinkSudhakar AgnihothramLisa E. GralinskiJessica A. PlanteRachel L. GrahamTrevor ScobeyXing-Yi GeEric F. DonaldsonScott H. RandellAntonio LanzavecchiaWayne A. MarascoZhengli-Li Shi & Ralph S. Baric. With the exception of Xing-Yi Ge and Zhengli-Li Shi all the other scientists involved in the study are from the West, probably sent directly from lab facilities owned and operated by the NIH.

In fact, despite his Indian name and background, Vineet D Menachery did his Ph.D. at Washington University in Saint Louis. He is currently working in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at the University of Texas Medical Branch. His current research is focused on: “Utilizing severe coronavirus infections, the Menachery Lab seeks to define virus-host interactions that dictate disease outcomes taking advantage of three cutting edge platforms: 1) reverse genetic systems for virus generation, 2) a refined systems biology approach, and 3) diverse model systems for infection.”xxiv The University of Texas is also home to Professor Eric Plianka, the “ecologist” who told a meeting of the Texas Academy of Science that a human population reduction was necessary in order to save the planet.xxv

Amazingly, it turns out that Vaneet D. Manachery and Sudhakar Agnihothram have the same picture posted in association with their identities when doing a profile search on Google:

Image is Available in PDF Format

In fact, Sudhakar Agnihothram has no picture posted of himself on Facebook and on other profiles. Why is that? And why would the same picture be posted for both men on Google? What is the cause of this mix up? Is Sudhakar Agnihothram an alter identity of Vaneet D. Menachery? Is Vaneet D. Manachery a government agent employing two identities? Looking at the various research studies undertaken by Sudhakar Agnihothram and Vaneet D. Menachary, it seems they are undertaking exactly the same kind of research. It is remarkable to note how they both just happen to have their fingers on the pulse of all the latest respiratory diseases that have affected the world since the beginning of the millennium:

As for the vaccines, it is clear that tests were being conducted on older and younger mice to see how they would react to SARS-CoV vaccine. What was observed is the fact that the vaccine failed “to protect aged animals in which augmented immune pathology was also observed.” What that means is that, far from protecting older mice from the virus, the vaccine actually caused an autoimmune pathological response, in which the vaccine caused the immune system to turn against the animal like a dog upon its master. In addition, DIV vaccination against infection by strain SHC014 could “possibly augment disease in the aged vaccinated group.” What this means is the vaccine was prone to creating variants of the virus that would be refractory to the test subject’s own immune response. In other words, the vaccine had a tendency to spur mutations and new variants of the disease, especially in older mice. The authors of the study provide an account of the anomaly as follows:

To evaluate the efficacy of existing vaccines against infection with SHC014-MA15, we vaccinated aged mice with double-inactivated whole SARS-CoV (DIV). Previous work showed that DIV could neutralize and protect young mice from challenge with a homologous virus; however, the vaccine failed to protect aged animals in which augmented immune pathology was also observed, indicating the possibility of the animals being harmed because of the vaccination. Here we found that DIV did not provide protection from challenge with SHC014-MA15 with regards to weight loss or viral titer. Consistent with a previous report with another heterologous group 2b CoVs15, serum from DIV-vaccinated, aged mice also failed to neutralize SHC014-MA15. Notably, DIV vaccination resulted in robust immune pathology and eosinophilia. Together, these results confirm that the DIV vaccine would not be protective against infection with SHC014 and could possibly augment disease in the aged vaccinated group.xxvi

There are claims the NIH earmarked $600,000 for WIV over a five-year period ostensibly to study whether bat coronaviruses could be transmitted to humans, as White House chief medical adviser, Fauci, told lawmakers. However, undertaking such studies requires gain-of-function research, despite his denials that the funding of WIV was for that purpose. He can deny it as much as he likes, but it is impossible to study the process of bat viruses jumping the species barrier from bats to humans without undertaking gain-of-function research. The reason for this is that the lab charged with the research has to accelerate the evolution of the virus using gain-of-function techniques to create mutations that allow scientists to see how the virus might be able to transcend the species barrier and make the jump from bats to humans. Fauci is being disingenuous in denying that the lab work being done was gain of function. That is a bold-faced lie and Fauci is a seasoned pro.

Fauci told a House Appropriations subcommittee that the money was funneled to the Chinese lab through the non-profit EcoHealth Alliance to fund what he described as being “a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists who were world experts on coronavirus.” The Chinese scientists can be as respectable as can be, but a scientist and government agency official of his stature must surely know that the Chinese government cannot be trusted with any kind of bacteriological or virology research that could be employed for dual purpose. Any intelligent U.S. government official has to be aware of the fact that the Chinese government is not our ally and cannot be trusted.

But Fauci emphatically denied that the money went toward so-called “gain of function” research, which he described as “taking a virus that could infect humans and making it either more transmissible and/or pathogenic for humans.”

That categorically was not done,” he insisted. Well, he’s lying because it was done, because research of that kind requires gain-of-function research in order to model, study, and experiment with the bat coronavirus using CRSPR/Cas9 genetic sequencers in an effort to study the various stages by which a virus can evolve to the point where it acquires the ability to jump the species barrier. This is tantamount to accelerating the virus’s evolution by several generations in a short time ostensibly so as to see what it might be capable of doing in the future. The problem is that once these lab technicians accelerate the virus’s evolution, they have for all intents and purposes created the future, so that if it ever escapes from the lab, either by accident or design, they have created the very nightmare they were ostensibly attempting to forestall.

Earlier in the hearing, NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins told Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) that researchers at the Wuhan lab “were not approved by NIH for doing “gain of function research” before adding “we are, of course, not aware of other sources of funds or other activities they might have undertaken outside of what our approved grant allowed.” That obfuscation is no excuse because Collins and others should have known better than to assume that scientists working for an enemy government would have the manners and good graces to adhere to the rules outlined in the program mandate.

The NIH cut off funding to EcoHealth Alliance in April of 2020, at the height of the pandemic and over the protests of EcoHealth President Peter Daszak. One can be assured that the NIH also curtailed funding because the institute was making an attempt to contain the fallout from the scandal of undertaking sensitive virology research with a rival superpower. Despite the denials of the U.S. government, the NIH and NIAID, the U.S. government and its agencies could never have naively walked into such a partnership with WIV. They knew exactly what they were doing. It is glaringly obvious that the Chinese were being set up to take the blame for the release of a virus weaponized through gain-of-function research to pose a major threat to the world, medically, economically and politically. The Chinese were set up, to put it bluntly, and they know it.

NIH funding of work at WIV has come under increasing scrutiny in recent weeks, with Republican senators like Rand Paul of Kentucky and Tom Cotton of Arkansas accusing Fauci of lying about whether the money was used for gain-of-function research.

While the theory that the virus accidentally leaked from the lab rather than spreading from bats to humans via another animal, is gaining currency, it is just another red herring. It did not accidentally escape from the lab. It was quite deliberate and everyone knows it. These officials have to discard their politically correct cowardly obfuscations and just say it as it is. They need to have the courage of their convictions and the integrity to say it like it is. They need to be more like former President Trump, who had more forthrightness and courage in his little pinky that these people have in their whole frame.

The Wall Street Journal broke the story recently that three researchers at the lab became so ill in November of 2019 that they sought hospital treatment. Though it is not clear whether the workers contracted coronavirus, their hospitalization coincides with the period when most experts believe the virus was spreading through the city of Wuhan.xxvii

According to a 2017 report in Science News, after surveying bats for five years, WIV had discovered a total of eleven new strains of SARS-related viruses. Within these strains, WIV researchers had found “all the genes” necessary to make a SARS coronavirus “similar to the epidemic strains.” The research team, led by the infamous “Bat Lady” Dr. Shi Zhengli, analyzed the genetic makeup of these newly discovered bat viruses, retracing the “steps that might have given rise to the original SARS virus.”

They found that parts of the DNA appeared to be “particularly prone to rearrangement.” This is what Judy Mikovits meant when she suggested the genetic sequencing was like genetic code. All it takes is a few CRSPR/Cas9 sequencers and the genes can be shuffled like a deck of cards, making the virus more virulent and pathogenic in the process. In addition, several of the strains could “already grow in human cells,” which indicated to these researchers that these bat coronaviruses were already primed to jump the species barrier to humans.

Also quoted in the Science News article is Xie Zhengli’s collaborator on the SARS-CoV-2 gain-of-function research conducted at WIV, Ralph Baric, from the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. Baric notes that the discovery means these bat viruses “are poised to cause future outbreaks,” adding “We can’t let our guard down.”

Dr. David E. Martin has provided a damning indictment of the criminal operations of the NIH/NIAID under Dr. Anthony Fauci’s direction, as criminal fraud and racketeering committed by the CDC, a fully fledged criminal organization.

To offer some background, Dr. Martin’s company—M·CAM—has been monitoring, since around the turn of the millennium, possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC). In the 2003-2004 Global Technology Assessment: Vector Weaponization, M·CAM made much of China’s expanding research in the area of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology. It had become obvious that China had joined the club of nations conducting gain-of-function research with the aim of constructing chimeric viruses.

Since that time, M·CAM has monitored the development of research and commercial efforts in this field, including, the research synergies forming between the CDC, the NIAID, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Harvard University, Emory University, Vanderbilt University, Tsinghua University, University of Pennsylvania, many other research institutions, along with the many commercial affiliations involved in this network.

The NIH’s grant AI23946-08 issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill—officially classified as being affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID since at least 2003—began work on the synthetic alteration of the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the purpose of achieving pathogenic enhancement, detection, and manipulation, which collectively fit the definition of gain-of-function research. And while Fauci will continue to deny this, and claim that critics like Senator Rand Paul don’t know what they are talking about in reference to gain-of-function allegation, the case for Fauci’s NIAID engaging in such research should be obvious by now.

Going all the way back to May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit. However, this can be misleading, as it makes it seem like a moneymaking scheme, when there is actually far more to it than that. Let’s face it, the business of manufacturing bioweapons has to, like any other business, be profitable if it is going to survive, and better still, thrive. In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what was reported to be the full-length cDNA of SARS CoV, in which it was clearly stated that SARS-CoV-1 constituted a chimeric viral construct or composite of DNA segments.

Using a panel of contiguous cDNAs that span the entire genome, we have assembled a full-length cDNA of the SARS-CoV Urbani strain, and have rescued molecularly cloned SARS viruses (infectious clone SARS-CoV) that contained the expected marker mutations inserted into the component clones.”

On April 19, 2002—approximately a year before the first SARS outbreak in Asia—Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing a recombinant coronavirus. For anyone who has ever done any research in this subject area, recombinant technology involves the reconstituting of viruses through genetic splicing of DNA to create chimeric hybrids. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a method for producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.” This work was supported by an NIH grant and GM63228. In short, the HHS was involved in funding the amplification of coronaviruses’ pathogenicity between 1999 and 2002, which was before SARS was ever detected in humans.

In the same time frame, M·CAM noted that the CDC was aggressively pursuing some rather unorthodox patent applications. For instance, on April 25, 2003, they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans, which had purportedly managed to transfer to humans during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia.

As will be shown later, 35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits the patenting of nature. This bill did not deter CDC from attempting to do just that. Their application, updated in 2007, was finally issued under U.S. Patent 7,220,852. Despite the illicit nature of the patent application, the illegally obtained patent constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS-CoV, or from developing tests or kits to detect the presence of the SARS coronavirus in humans, or from working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. This means that the patent holder had obtained proprietary ownership not only of the virus, but held the only authorized license to seek its detection, and the only authorized license to develop therapies to ostensibly combat it. In other words, the patent owners had achieved complete mastery over the means and the ends by applying Hegelian dialectics, in order to patent the problem, gain proprietary ownership of the means of detecting it, while, at the same time, gaining proprietary ownership over the therapeutic solution. This led to research experimentation that included recombinant chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, and treatment in the form of experimental “vaccines” and other so-called “therapies,” along with efforts to achieve successful weaponization of coronaviruses.

In short, with Baric’s U.S. Patent 6,593,111 (Claims 1 and 5) and CDC’s ‘852 patent (Claim 1), no research of this kind—namely gain-of-function—could be legally conducted in the U.S. without permission or infringement.

M·CAM noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was not only the recipient of millions of dollars in U.S. research grants from several federal agencies, but also sat on the WHO’s International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG). This conflict of interest is frightening as it shows that the NIH/NIAID and the CDC, and for that matter WHO, are running a national and international protection racket, in which they are pushing so-called “vaccine protection” on the masses, with the mandate that, if health institutions, governments, world health agencies and other bodies do not play along, the health protection rackets will release a bioweapon of even greater pathogenicity and virulence. In addition, unless countries procure and dispense the vaccine, their populations will be threatened with political, economic, and social sabotage.

In this capacity, Baric was not only responsible for determining “novelty” of clades of virus species, but directly benefitted from making false claims about “novel” strains, in order to solicit more research funding, as well as accruing profits from patents and commercial enterprise. Together with CDC, NIAID, WHO, academic institutions, and pharmaceutical companies such as Johnson & Johnson, Sanofi, Moderna, Ridgeback, Gilead, Sherlock Biosciences, etc., there is a powerful group of interests comprising what amounts to “interlocking directorates” in complete violation of U.S. anti-trust laws.

In a quite obscene conflict of interests, these entities also happen to be affiliated with the WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) whose members were instrumental in organizing the global coronavirus “germ game” exercise EVENT 201 in October 2019. This event, funded by the principal investor in Sherlock Biosciences and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, amounted to a respiratory disease global preparedness exercise to be completed by September 2020. This is precisely what alerted M·CAM to anticipate an “epidemic” scenario unfolding sometime in 2020, actually anticipating the emergence of a plague-causing pathogen from among such candidate locales as Wuhan or Guangdong China, northern Italy, Seattle, New York, or a combination of such population centers. What alerted M·CAM to such a possibility was because Dr. Zhengli Xie and Dr. Baric’s work on zoonotic transmission of coronaviruses identified overlapping coronavirus mutations in bat populations located in these human population centers.xxviii

The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier is therefore highly revealing of the numerous criminal violations that may be associated with the CoViD-19 bioterrorism plot. For instance, the dossier shows that the research undertaken by Fauci, Baric, Batlady Xie and company, on behalf of the NIH/NIAID and CDC, are found to be in strict violation of Bill 35 U.S.C. § 101, which disqualifies any patent application being made on that which is “natural,” i.e. neither invented, created, nor manufactured by means of human agency, but found solely in nature.

35 U.S.C. § 101

From Justice Clarence Thomas’ opinion for the majority

Section 101 of the Patent Act provides: “Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful…composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.” 35 U.S.C. § 101.

We have “long held that this provision contains an important implicit exception [:] Laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas are not patentable.” Mayo, 566 U.S., at ___, 132 S.Ct., at 1293. Rather, “’they are the basic tools of scientific and technological work’” that lie beyond the domain of patent protection. Id., at ___, 132 S.Ct., at 1293. As the Court has explained, without this exception, there would be considerable danger that the grant of patents would
“tie up” the use of such tools and thereby ”inhibit future innovation premised upon them.” Id., at ___, 132 S.Ct., at 1301. This would be at odds with the very point of patents, which exist to promote creation. Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303, 309, 100 S.Ct. 2204, 65 L.Ed.2d 144 (1980) (Products of nature are not created, and “’manifestations… of nature [are] free to all men and reserved exclusively to none’”).xxix

In their majority opinion in 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court made it abundantly clear that the Court had “long held” that nature was not patentable. Merely isolating DNA does not constitute patentable subject matter. In their patent, the CDC made false and misleading claims to the United States Patent & Trademark Office by stating that, “A newly isolated human coronavirus has been identified as the causative agent of SARS, and is termed SARS-CoV.”4 No “causal” data was provided for this statement.

When they filed their patent application on April 25, 2003, their first claim (and the only one that survived to ultimate issuance over the objection of the patent examiner in 2006 and 2007) was the genome for SARS CoV.

While this patent is clearly illegal under 35 U.S.C. §101, not only did the CDC insist on its granting over non-final and final rejections, but they also continued to pay maintenance fees on the patent after the 2013 Supreme Court decision confirmed that it was illegal.

In addition, the CDC patented the detection of SARS-CoV using a number of methods, including reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). With this patent, they precluded anyone outside of their licensed or conspiring interest from legally engaging in independent verification of their claim that they had isolated a virus, that it was a causative agent for SARS-CoV, or that any therapy could be effective against the reported pathogen.

It is important to note that the CDC’s patent applications were also rejected in non-final and final rejections for ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 102 for being publicly disclosed prior to their own filing. In the first non-final rejection, the USPTO stated that the CDC’s genome was published in four Genbank accession entries on April 14, 18, and 21, 2003 with identity ranging from 96.8% to 99.9% identical sequences. Dr. Fauci knew, and failed to disclose evidence that the CDC patent was illegal, based on work he had funded in the years leading up to the SARS outbreak.

After seeking an illegal patent, petitioning to override the decision of an examiner to reject it, and ultimately prevailing with the patent’s grant, the CDC lied to the public by stating they were controlling the patent so that it would be “publicly available”. Unfortunately, this public statement is falsified by the fact that their own publication in Genbank had, in fact, made it public domain and thereby unpatentable. This fact, confirmed by patent examiners, was overridden by CDC in a paid solicitation to override the law.

While not covered under 35 U.S.C. §101, Fauci’s abuse of the patent law is detailed below. Of note, however, is his willful and deceptive use of the term “vaccine” in patents and public pronouncements to pervert the meaning of the term for the manipulation of the public.

In the 1905 Jacobson v. Mass case, the court was clear that a PUBLIC BENEFIT was required for a vaccine to be mandated. Neither Pfizer nor Moderna have proved a disruption of transmission. In Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S.

11 (1905), the court held that the context for their opinion rested on the following principle:

This court has more than once recognized it as a fundamental principle that ‘persons and property are subjected to all kinds of restraints and burdens in order to secure the general comfort, health, and prosperity of the state…”

The Moderna and Pfizer so-called “vaccine” trials have explicitly acknowledged that their gene therapy technology has no effect whatsoever in mitigating viral infection or transmission and merely conveys to the recipient the capacity to produce an S1 spike protein endogenously by the introduction of a synthetic mRNA sequence. Therefore, the basis for the Massachusetts statute and the Supreme Court’s determination is moot with respect to this patent because of the fraudulent nature of the patent itself.

In addition, the USPTO, in its REJECTION of Anthony Fauci’s HIV vaccine made the following statement supporting their rejection of his fraudulent invention:

Image is Available in PDF Format

18 U.S.C. §2339 C et seq. – Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror

Indirectly, unlawfully and willfully provides or collects funds with the intention that such funds be used, or with the knowledge that such funds are to be used, in full or in part, in order to carry out—

  • an act which constitutes an offense within the scope of a treaty specified in subsection (e)(7), as implemented by the United States, or

  • any other act intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to a civilian, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities in a situation of armed conflict, when the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population, or to compel a government or an international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act….

By April 11, 2005, Fauci was publicly acknowledging the association of SARS with bioterror potential. Leveraging the fear of the anthrax bioterrorism of 2001, he publicly celebrated the economic boon that domestic terror had directed towards his budget. He specifically stated that NIAID was actively funding research on a “SARS Chip” DNA microarray to rapidly detect SARS (something that was not made available during the current “pandemic”) and two candidate vaccines focused on the SARS CoV spike protein. Led by three Chinese researchers under his employment—Zhi-yong Yang, Wing-pui Kong, and Yue Huang—Fauci had at least one DNA vaccine in animal trials by 2004. This team, part of the Vaccine Research Center at NIAID, was primarily focused on HIV vaccine development but was tasked to identify SARS vaccine candidates as well. Working in collaboration with Sanofi, Scripps Institute, Harvard, MIT and NIH, Dr. Fauci’s decision to unilaterally promote vaccines as a primary intervention for several designated “infectious diseases” precluded proven therapies from being applied to the sick and dying.

The CDC and NIAID led by Fauci entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with EcoHealth Alliance Inc.) and with foreign nations (specifically, the WIV and the Chinese Academy of Sciences) through the 2014 et seq NIH Grant R01AI110964 to exploit their patent rights. This research was known to involve surface proteins in a coronavirus that had the capacity to directly infect human respiratory systems. In flagrant violation of the NIH moratorium on gain-of-function research, NIAID and Ralph Baric persisted in working with chimeric coronavirus components, with the specific aim of amplifying the pathogenicity of the biologic material.

By October 2013, the WIV 1 coronavirus S1 spike protein was described in NIAID’s funded work in China. This work involved NIAID, USAID, and Peter Daszak, the head of EcoHealth Alliance. This work, funded under R01AI079231, was pivotal to the isolation and manipulation of viral fragments selected from sites across China which contained high risk for severe human response.

By March 2015, both the virulence of the S1 spike protein and the ACE II receptor was known to present a considerable risk to human health. NIAID, EcoHealth Alliance and numerous researchers lamented the fact that the public was not sufficiently concerned about the coronavirus to adequately fund their desired

Knowing that the HSS, through CDC, NIH, NIAID, aided and abetted by means of their funded laboratories and commercial partners, the creation of patents on each proposed element of medical countermeasures and their funding, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Gao (China CDC), and Dr. Elias of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conspiring to commit acts of terror on the global population—including the citizens of the United States—when, in September 2019, they published the following mandate:

Countries, donors and multilateral institutions must be prepared for the worst. A rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen (whether naturally emergent or accidentally or deliberately released) poses additional preparedness requirements. Donors and multilateral institutions must ensure adequate investment in developing innovative vaccines and therapeutics, surge manufacturing capacity, broad-spectrum antivirals and appropriate nonpharmaceutical interventions. All countries must develop a system for immediately sharing genome sequences of any new pathogen for public health purposes along with the means to share limited medical countermeasures across countries.xxxi

As if to confirm the utility of the September 2019 demand for “financing and development of” vaccine and the fortuitous SARS CoV-2 alleged outbreak in December of 2019, Anthony Fauci began gloating that his fortunes for additional funding were likely to change for the better. In a February 2020 interview in STAT, he was quoted as saying:

The emergence of the new virus is going to change that figure, likely considerably, Fauci said. “I don’t know how much it’s going to be. But I think it’s going to generate more sustained interest in coronaviruses because it’s very clear that coronaviruses can do really interesting things.”xxxii

Let’s rewind the tape and hear those words again: “it’s very clear that coronaviruses can do really interesting things.” Those are the words of a low-empathy psychopath who is coldly reviewing the effect coronaviruses have on those they infect, something he finds intensely fascinating. Can anyone imagine a comment or an attitude more cold-hearted, unfeeling and lacking in empathy than this?

Fauci has resorted to intimidation and coercion of a civilian population and sought to influence the policy of a government, which has served to influence other governments. Reporting to the president that as many as 2.2 million deaths could result from a pathogen that had not yet been isolated, and whose infection rate could not be measured with any accuracy, Fauci intimidated and coerced the government and citizens of the U.S. into adopting reckless, untested, and harmful measures, resulting in criminal endangerment to lives and livelihoods. In fact, neither the Imperial College nor the “independent” Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation—funded principally by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation—had any evidence of having any accurately obtained estimates for establishing the harmfulness of the so-called “novel coronavirus,” as it was initially dubbed, but that did not stop Fauci, without peer review or consultation, from adopting the shocking estimates of these bodies as the basis for pandemic response measures that inveigh against traditional medical wisdom.

In light of this, Fauci is in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802, defined as Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in the death of American Citizens. In brief, its relevance to the criminal actions of Fauci are summed up by section 802 of the bill:

Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. No. 107-52) expanded the definition of terrorism to cover “domestic,” as opposed to international, terrorism. A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act “dangerous to human life” that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion;

While exploiting the power of the NIAID when functioning as its head, Anthony Fauci actively suppressed proven medical therapeutics used successfully in the past against respiratory agents, that offered alternatives to the products funded by the pharmacological entities he acted on behalf of and served, for which he had provided direct funding and for whom he would receive tangible and intangible benefits, which in any judicious case of oversight would be seen as a gross conflict of interest.xxxiii

NIAID’s Director Anthony Fauci is listed as an inventor on 8 U.S. patents. As in the feudal system of old, the pecking order allows for the highest-ranking lord to assume all the credit. Fauci invented nothing. His lab rats are responsible for the technical expertise, and as a Deep State plant, Fauci the bureaucrat takes all the credit. He is a fraud in every conceivable application of the word. To add grist to this claim, none of Fauci’s so-called patents are reported in NIAID, NIH, or GAO reports of active licensing despite the fact that Fauci was purportedly compelled to get paid for his interleukin-2 “invention,” payments for which he claimed it was inappropriate for him to receive payment, and which he instead donated all proceeds to an unnamed charity.xxxiv

None of Fauci’s patents are listed in the FDA’s Orange book itemized in the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report. Furthermore, none of the NIAID patents are listed despite the evidence that Gilead Sciences and Janssen Pharmaceuticals (a division of Johnson & Johnson) directly profited from products derived from NIAID research and development. Profits accrued for both entities are estimated to have been over $2 billion annually from NIAID-funded science. No mention is made in the GAO report of 2 patents for Velclade®, which has been estimated to have generated sales of at least $2.18 billion annually. None of the patents for Yescarta®, Lumoxiti®, nor Kepivance® are listed in the GAO report. This is in strict violation of 37 USC §410.10 and 35 USC §202(a), since over 13 of the 21 patents in the GAO report fail to disclose NIH as the source of funding.xxxv

In light of this, one needs to also consider the fact that lying to the GAO is tantamount to lying to congress, an offence clearly punishable by law under 18 U.S.C. § 1001–Lying to Congress.

18 U.S.C. § 1001–Lying to Congress

  1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

  • falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

  • makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

  • makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.xxxvi

Sample of Shady Flow of Funds to Evade Oversight

It happens that U.S. Patent 8,999,351 was issued to Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation in Burnaby, British Columbia. In the patent application, they disclose that their research was supported by a grant from the NIAID (Grant HHSN266200600012C). Ironically, this $23 million grant was awarded in 2006 to Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., not to Tekmira, so there is a funding shell game taking place to conceal the real grantee and grant source.

In 2012, Alnylam agreed to pay Tekmira $65 million to settle legal disputes, including a $1 billion damages claim for “relentless and egregious” misappropriation of Tekmira’s trade secrets. From the patent filing’s earliest priority of November 10, 2008, there is no public record stating that Tekmira was the beneficiary of this NIAID grant. Nevertheless, it turns out that the lipid nanoparticle technology developed from this grant is the very same technology now being used in Moderna’s CoViD-19 gene therapy experiment referred to as an mRNA “vaccine”. In their 10-Q filing, Alnylam reported acquiring a license to technology it had received from Arbutus—formerly Tekmira—which has accused Acuitas of misappropriating trade secrets and licensing them to Moderna and Pfizer, both of which have entered into collaboration with BioNTech.xxxvii

If that isn’t enough, it turns out that, through the issuance of non-competitive grant awards to UNC Chapel Hill’s Ralph Baric, to selection of the Bio-Safety Level 4 laboratory locations, to the setting of prices for Remdesivir and mRNA therapies from Moderna and Pfizer, NIAID, CDC, and the HHS have conspired to illegally allocate Federal funds to co-conspiring parties without proper oversight or independent review.

Around March 12, 2020, in an effort to enrich their financial interests by way of securing additional funding from federal agencies and so-called charitable foundations, the CDC and NIAID, under the direction of Anthony Fauci, elected to suspend testing and classify CoViD-19 by capricious symptom presentation alone. Forcing the public to rely on The CoViD Tracking Project—funded by the Bloomberg, Zuckerberg and Gates Foundation—Fauci used fraudulent testing technology (RT-PCR) to conflate “CoViD cases” with positive PCR tests in the living, while calling for CoViD-19 deaths to be counted on the basis of symptoms alone. This perpetuated a market demand for the CoViD-19 vaccines, which virus creator, Fauci, held proprietary ownership over through the federal agencies, NIH/NIAID, he headed.xxxviii

Fauci just happens to be on the Leadership Council of the Bill & Malinda Gates Global Vaccine Action Plan. While controlling the economic dispensation of Federal research funding, Fauci has been, and continues to be, on WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. No one should have that much power and influence. He is joined on this board by the conflicted donor from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Dr. Chris Elias and the State Council of China’s Dr. George F. Gao of the Chinese CDC. This GPMB stipulated that all member states must take part in a global simulation of the release of a respiratory pathogen, which we all now know was Event 201, which is a disguised reference to 21, as in 2021, just in time to meet the sustainable development goals (SDGs) of UN Agenda 21.

It appears that, during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material were illegal, the CDC and NIAID led by Anthony Fauci entered into trade among States, including EcoHealth Alliance Inc., and with foreign nations—in particular WIV and the Chinese Academy of Sciences—through the 2014 et seq NIH Grant R01AI110964 to exploit their patent rights.

It also appears that, during the period of patent enforcement, and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material were illegal, the CDC and NIAID entered into trade among States and with foreign nations (specifically, WIV and the Chinese Academy of Sciences represented by Zheng-Li Xie) through U19AI109761 (Ralph S. Baric), U19AI107810 (Ralph S. Baric), and National Natural Science Foundation of China Award 81290341 (Zheng-Li Xie) et al., 2015-2016.

It further appears that, during the period of patent enforcement, and with the exact same Supreme Court ruling in place, the CDC and NIAID entered into trade among States and with foreign nations to conduct chimeric construction of novel coronavirus material with intended viral vectors, prior to, during, and following the ruling made by the NIH in October 17, 2014 that this work did not sufficiently meet its biosecurity and safety standards.

In this inquiry, it is presumed that the CDC and its associates were: a) fully aware of the work being performed using their patented technology; b) entered into explicit or implicit agreements including licensing, or other consideration; and, c) willfully engaged one or more foreign interests to carry forward the exploitation of their proprietary technology, when the U.S. Supreme Court had established that such patents were illegal and after the NIH had issued a moratorium on such research.

Reportedly, in January 2018, the U.S. Embassy in China sent investigators to WIV and found that, “During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.” The Washington Post reported that this information was contained in a cable dated January 19, 2018. Over a year later, in June 2019, the CDC conducted an inspection of Fort Detrick’s USAMRIID and ordered it closed after alleging that their inspection found biosafety hazards. A report in the journal Nature in 2003 (423(6936): 103) reported cooperation between CDC and USAMRIID on coronavirus research followed by considerable subsequent collaboration. The CDC, for what appear to be the same type of concern identified in Wuhan, elected to continue work with the Chinese government while closing the U.S. Army facility.

The CDC reported the first case of a SARS-CoV-like illness in the U.S. in January 2020 with the CDC’s Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) reporting 650 clinical cases and 210 tests. Given that the suspected pathogen was first identified in official reports on December 31, 2019, one can only conclude that CDC: a) had the means and ability to conduct tests to confirm the existence of a “novel coronavirus”; or, b) did not have said means and ability and falsely reported the information in January. It strains credulity to suggest that the WHO or the CDC could manufacture and distribute tests for a “novel” pathogen, when the reliability of such tests have been called into question by world-renowned scientists like Michael Yeaden, formerly at the helm of Pfizer.xxxix

M·CAM and Knowledge Ecology International have independently confirmed that Moderna violated U.S. law when it failed to disclose the fact that the U.S. government was the source of funding for their patents and patent applications. This is particularly problematic for U.S. Patent 10,702,600 (‘600) related to, “a messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) comprising an open reading frame encoding a betacoronavirus (BetaCoV) S protein or S protein subunit formulated in a lipid nanoparticle.” The specific claims addressing the pivot to the SARS Coronavirus were patented on March 28, 2019—9 months before the SARS CoV-2 outbreak. This provides significant evidence that this entire orchestration is a plandemic from start to finish.

Both the patent and the DARPA funding for the technology were disclosed in the New England Journal of Medicine, while government funding of the patent was concealed. In 2013, the Autonomous Diagnostics to Enable Prevention and Therapeutics (ADEPT) program awarded grant funding to Moderna Therapeutics ostensibly for developing a new type of so-called ‘vaccine’, consisting of an mRNA vaccine, which is actually a gene therapy and not the inoculant it purports to be. The initial DARPA grant was W911NF-13-1-0417. The company used that technology to develop its CoViD-19 ‘vaccine’, currently undergoing Phase I clinical trials in conjunction with NIH. However, the bona fide nature of the so-called ‘trial’ must also be questioned given the wholesale fraud committed at every stage, beginning with the illegal and fraudulent patenting of ‘nature’ in the form of a patent on a virus.xl

Anthony Fauci has forced upon the healthy population of the U.S. a medical experiment in the form of an unlawful clinical trial justified and mandated through the extrapolation of epidemiologic data by the HSS. No informed consent has been sought or secured for any of the “medical countermeasures” forced upon the population by means of the Emergency Authorization Act provisions. This is in strict violation of the Nuremburg Code, which expressly forbids a medical experiment from being conducted on a civilian population without the informed consent of said population. In addition, no independent review board, as required by the statute, has been convened.


i Natalie Battendorf and Jason Leopold,“Anthony Fauci’s Emails Reveal The Pressure That Fell On One Man,” June 2 2021,


iii Alexandra Bruce, “The Primary 9/11 Cover-Up Artist Philip Zelikow Is Now the COVID Commission Planning Group Chairman,” May 27, 2021,


v Matt Margolis, “BOMBSHELL: Fauci Pushed for ‘Gain-of-Function’ Research in 2012, Said It Was Worth the Risk of Pandemic,” June 6, 2021,

vi Stacey Lennox, “The 2015 Gain-of-Function Study at the Wuhan Institute Had a Glaring Omission That Is Unbelievable,” June 3, 2021,

vii Natelie Winters, “Stunning Daszak/Fauci Emails Reveal Non-Zoonotic Coronavirus and Attempts To Infect Human Cells,” By Natalie Winters, July 9, 2021,

viii FauciEmails# quoted in, “Stunning Daszak/Fauci Emails Reveal Non-Zoonotic Coronavirus and Attempts To Infect Human Cells,” By Natalie Winters, July 9, 2021,

ix Natural News, “Fauci email shows that Daszak was manipulating bat coronaviruses to make them attack human cells,” July 12, 2021,

x FreedomBeacon, “Wuhan Lab Found The Genes To Make COVID In 2017, Evidence Shows,”

xi “Fauci and Rand Paul clash over SUPER VIRUS CONSPIRACY,” May 11, 2021,

xii Fauci interview on C-Span featured in “Fauci admits ‘modest’ NIH funding of Wuhan lab but denies ‘gain of function’”

xiii Senate Appropriations Hearing, “Don’t Think the Chinese Would Lie To You?”: Senator Kennedy Pushes Fauci on Gain-Of-Function Research,” May 26. 2021,

xiv Forbes Breaking News, “‘No Idea Why That Would Be Redacted’: Johnson Calls For More Transparency In Fauci Communications,” August 4, 2021,

xv One America News Network (OANN), “FOIA Disclosure: Fauci Conducted Inhumane Tests On Dogs, NIAID Wasted $424k Of Taxpayer Funds To Infest Healthy Dogs With Parasites,” August 8, 2021,

xvi Kent Heckenlively J.D. and Judy Mikovits, Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science, Foreword by Robert Kennedy Jr., New York: Skyhorse Publishing, 2020, pp.137.

xvii Ibid., p.140.


xix Vineet D MenacheryBoyd L Yount JrKari DebbinkSudhakar AgnihothramLisa E GralinskiJessica A PlanteRachel L GrahamTrevor ScobeyXing-Yi GeEric F DonaldsonScott H RandellAntonio LanzavecchiaWayne A MarascoZhengli-Li Shi & Ralph S Baric, “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence,”

xx Ibid.

xxi Ibid.

xxii Ibid.

xxiii Ibid.

xxiv utmb Health,

xxv Ronald Baley, “To Save the Planet, Kill 90 Percent of People Off, Says UT Ecologist,” April 3, 2006,

xxvi Zhengli-Li Shi & Ralph S Baric et al., “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence,”

xxvii Samuel Chamberlaine, “Fauci admits ‘modest’ NIH funding of Wuhan lab but denies ‘gain of function’”

xxviii Dr. David E. Martin, “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,”, pp.2, 3.

xxix Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013), quoted in “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,”, p.5.

xxx Dr. David E. Martin, “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,”, pp.5-7.

xxxi Ibid., pp.8, 9.

xxxii Ibid., p.9.

xxxiii Ibid., pp.10, 11.

xxxiv, quoted in “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,”, p.13.

xxxv Dr. David E. Martin, “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,”, p.13.

xxxvi 18 U.S.C. § 1001–Lying to Congress, quoted in , “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,”, p.12.

xxxvii Dr. David E. Martin, “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,”, p.14, 15.

xxxviii Ibid., p.20.

xxxix Ibid., pp.21, 22.

xl Ibid., pp.23. 24.

The Science of the CoViD-19 Pandemic 


The Science of the CoViD-19 Pandemic

Timothy Spearman

Toronto International College Canada

*Corresponding Author



Article History: | Received: 10.03.2021 | Accepted: 20.08.2021 | Published: 31.08.2021|

Abstract: It is interesting that the Hindu Vedas introduced by Aryan invaders to India promotes a caste system that has led to the subjugation of the indigenous Dravidian population. The religion promotes racial hygiene just as the Nazis did, but because it is couched in the form of religious dogma, it has never been repudiated, unlike the case with the Nazis who made racial hygiene into a political ideology that has been roundly criticized around the world. It turns out, however, that the Hindus may have had reasons for promoting their caste system, even health reasons as it turns out. What has emerged from recent genetic studies is that certain genetic haplotypes, particularly in the Indian subcontinent as well as South Asia, have been found to be extremely vulnerable to CoViD-19, due to a weakness in the genes that leads to autoimmune dysfunction in the immune response of CoViD-19 patients. The weak link is found in human populations with a high ratio of Denisovan and Neanderthal genetics. Based on this fact it could be reasonable to deduce that the CoViD-19 genocide operation could have its roots in a eugenics program. That would be a safe deduction given that Bill Gates helped host Event 201, the “germ game” rehearsal for the CoViD-19 plandemic. Gates is a eugenicist whose father ran Family Planning, previously knows as the American Eugenics Society. Ever the inveterate hypocrite, Gates should be consider removing himself from the gene pool. He is pointing the finger at the “useless eaters,” but has three fingers pointing back at himself.

Keywords: Hindu Vedas, caste system, Dravidian population, CoViD-19 Pandemic.

Copyright @ 2021: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use (NonCommercial, or CC-BY-NC) provided the original author and source are credited.




Giovanni Boccacccio’s The Decameron consists of a collection of short stories written around 1350, just after the Bubonic Plague swept China, India, Persia, Syria, Egypt, and Europe, eventually killing an estimated 60% of the European population, primarily of peasant stock, which indirectly affected the food supply, since this was the population that cultivated the land and grew the food. In the book’s introduction, the author presents a fairly clear picture of how people nearly 700 years ago reacted to the pandemic. While the disease was of somewhat mysterious origin and would have produced the perception that the population had fallen under some form of Divine judgment, they were certainly aware that it was contagious and that person-to-person transmission was taking place. “There were some people who thought that living modestly and avoiding excess might help a great deal in resisting the disease,” Boccaccio wrote. “So they gathered in small groups and lived entirely apart from everyone else. They shut themselves up in those houses where one could live well.” They created a bubble around themselves and adopted shelter-in-place measures similar to today’s CoViD-19 lockdown practices.

“Others thought the opposite: they believed that drinking excessively, enjoying life, going about singing and celebrating, satisfying in every way the appetites as best they could, laughing, and making light of everything by going to one tavern to another all day and night,” Boccaccio wrote, was the best antidote. They were probably wrong, but their modern equivalent, those who defy the lockdown and party and refuse to maintain social distancing are probably wrong too. Others adopted the middle way. They did not attend bacchanals, nor did they quarantine themselves. “They went about carrying in their hand’s flowers, or sweet-smelling herbs, or various kinds of spices; and they held them to their noses, believing such smells were a wonderful means of purifying the brain,” Boccaccio wrote. They would be the equivalent of those who turn to alternative medicine to cure their ills. “Others were of a crueler opinion; they maintained that there was no better medicine than to flee and men and women in great numbers abandoned their city, their houses, and their relatives.” Boccaccio wrote that fear so gripped the population that people even felt compelled to abandon their loved ones. “Brother abandoned brother, uncle abandoned nephew and very often wife abandoned husband.” Parents were even known to abandon their children. Today, at the height of the crisis, the cruelty of isolation has certainly been felt by the elderly and the infected, with relatives kept away, regardless of their wish or intention.i

Certainly, medical knowledge back in the days of Boccaccio is a far cry from what it is today, but with vaccines being the only antidote that officialdom will acknowledge or accept, with all other antidotes being suppressed, it is clear that the scientific dictatorship limits our options in fighting this disease with as hard-headed, arrogant, and obdurate a stance as our medieval forebears. We really haven’t advanced as a society nor as a scientific community one iota. We just like to pretend we have, and the pretense wears thin rather quickly as it becomes more and more apparent that our medical tsars wear no clothes and are standing before us stark naked.

In times of plague, whether its invasive species like locusts, murder hornets, killer bees, lamprey eel or carp, or whether its plagues like HIV/AIDS or strains of the flu, there is a tendency to blame them all on foreigners and give them foreign names, because the source of all plagues seems to be the “other,” all those who are not as we are. Hence, CoViD-19 was originally dubbed the China virus or the Wuhan Flu. But this is not the only time, flu bugs have been given foreign names. There have been an array of these foreign-sounding plagues over the course of the 20th century like the Hong Kong Flu or the Spanish Flu of 1918 for instance. The so-called Spanish Flu actually began life in the U.S. but was variously known in other countries as the German Flu, the French Flu, the Brazilian Flu, but finally ended up being recorded in history books as the Spanish Flu. Some records suggest the Spanish Flu infected more than half of the 2 billion inhabitants living at the time.

The Spanish flu infected greater than 50% of Earth’s inhabitants and is thought to have been responsible for as many as 50 million deaths worldwide. To make matters worse, it hit near the end of the Great War, which was responsible for eviscerating 40 million soldiers and civilians from the face of the planet in what had to be the cruelest combat zone ever known. By the time the Armistice was signed, the pandemic was riding the second wave of a disease tsunami that went around the world.ii

The CoViD-19 variant now sweeping the world is subtly different from the one that first emerged in China. SARS-Cov-2 is the official name of the virus known under the informal name CoViD-19. The infectious disease that is continuing to spread around the globe is undergoing mutations at a mercurial pace. However, while scientists have taken stock of thousands of mutations, or changes to the virus’s genetic makeup, one variant, in particular, that emerged late in 2020, has raised the alarm.

The crucial questions about this mutation are: does this make the virus more pathogenic or virulent or both? And could it undermine efforts by vaccine-makers to come up with an effective vaccine against the first strain? This coronavirus is actually changing very slowly compared with a virus like the common flu. With relatively low levels of natural immunity in the population, no vaccine and few effective treatments, there is nothing to serve as a catalyst for it to mutate or attempt to adapt. Meanwhile, it is managing to keep itself in circulation. The new CoViD-19 variant—D614G—is situated within the protein forming the “spike” used by the virus to break into our cells. The spike is rather like a hacker who breaks through the cell’s firewall, finding a means to penetrate the cell membrane. The new variant must have emerged sometime after the initial Wuhan outbreak, most likely in Italy it is believed. It later emerged in 97% of samples around the world.

Evolutionary Edge

The question is whether this dominance, achieved through mutation, is intended to give the virus some advantage, or whether it is merely a random, chance occurrence. It is widely believed that viruses don’t really operate according to a grand plan. They mutate constantly, and while some changes will help a virus reproduce, some may hinder it. Other mutations are not really adaptive in nature, but merely neutral. They’re a “by-product of the virus replicating,” Dr. Lucy van Dorp of University College London explains, adhering to the view that they hitch-hike on the virus without changing its behavior.

It is thought that the mutation could have become very widespread just because it happened early in the outbreak and spread, a phenomenon known as the “founder effect.” This is what Dr. van Dorp and her team believe is the most likely explanation for the mutation becoming so common.

However, this view is now being called into question, as a growing number of virologists now believe, as Dr. Thushan de Silva of the University of Sheffield explains, there is enough data to say this version of the virus has a “selective advantage,” granting it an evolutionary edge over the earlier version.

Though there is still not enough evidence to say it’s more transmissible in people, he says, he is confident that the mutation is not neutral, but meant to grant it selective advantages. A laboratory-based study has revealed that the mutated virus was better at entering human cells than previous versions, say professors Hyeryun Choe and Michael Farzan, at Scripps University in Florida. Changes to the spike protein the virus uses to latch on to human cells has allowed it to “stick together better and function more efficiently.”

Image is Available in PDF Format

Professor Farzan said the spike proteins of these viruses were different in ways that were “consistent with, but not proving, greater transmissibility.” At the New York Genome Center and New York University, Professor Neville Sanjana, an expert in the gene-editing technology known as CRISPR, made an even bolder assertion. His team edited a virus so that it contained an alteration in the spike protein and pitted it against a real SARS-CoV-2 virus from the early Wuhan outbreak. The two versions of the virus were unleashed in human tissue cells. The results, he believes, prove the mutated virus is more transmissible than the original version, at least in the experiment undertaken in a lab setting.

Dr. van Dorp, however, asserts that it is uncertain how representative it is of transmission in real patients. But Professor Farzan maintains that these “marked biological differences” were “substantial enough to tilt the evidence somewhat” in favor of the notion that the mutation was making the virus more pathogenic, meaning more transmissible.

What has happened outside the lab in the human population has provided researchers with some indirect evidence that the mutation has made the CoViD-19 virus more transmissible. Two studies have shown that patients infected with the mutated form of the virus have greater quantities of the virus showing up in their swab samples. This might suggest the virus had become more pathogenic, but not more virulent, since the evidence failed to show that the infected had become sicker or had longer hospital stays.

The fact that a virus is more transmissible does not mean that it is more pathogenic. In fact, the opposite often holds true. There is no evidence the CoViD-19 virus has mutated to make patients more ill. However, when it comes to transmissibility, viral load only indicates how well the virus spreads within a single person. It doesn’t necessarily account for how virulent it might be. The real litmus test, consisting of a controlled trial, had not yet been conducted to determine pathogenicity. Such a trial might involve, for example, infecting animals with either one or the other CoViD-19 variant to see which is more pathogenic.

One of the leaders of the study, Professor Bette Korber of Los Alamos National Laboratory in the U.S., said there was no consensus, but the claim that the mutation may have increased the viral load of those infected was “getting less controversial as more data accrues.”


The Mutation Is the Pandemic

When it comes to looking at the whole population, it is difficult to assess whether the virus is becoming more or less infectious. It is believed that its course has been drastically altered by interventions, including lockdowns. But Professor Korber says the fact the variant now appears to be dominant everywhere, including in China, indicates it may have developed mutations or adaptations to make it more pathogenic. Whenever the two versions circulated within the population at the same time, the new variant took over. In fact, the D614G variant is so dominant, it may have evolved into the form of the virus actually causing the pandemic. And it has been in that ascendant position for some time, perhaps even since the start of the pandemic in places like the UK and the east coast of the U.S.

Many scientists are of the opinion that most of the vaccines that have been in development are based on a different region of the spike, so the mutation does not appear to make the vaccines redundant. In addition, there is some evidence antibodies defend just as successfully against the new strain, which can offer protection against infection should an individual become infected, or be vaccinated against it, so scientists studying the different variants of the virus believe. But since the science of CoViD-19 is so fast-paced, scientists will have to remain vigilant in surveying and responding to further CoViD-19 adaptations or mutations. iii

Coronavirus Mutation Makes It More Pathogenic

A study involving more than 5,000 CoViD-19 patients in Houston has shown that the virus is cumulatively developing more genetic mutations, and the variation known as D614G may have made it more pathogenic. According to the paper published in the peer-reviewed journal mBIO, variant D614G, located in the spike protein, helps the virus penetrate the cell membrane to gain entry. It is the largest peer-reviewed study of SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences ever undertaken in one metropolitan region of the U.S.

Image is Available in PDF Format

The number of virus strains present in each zip code in Houston during the second wave of CoVD-19 cases in summer 2020. Number of strains is represented by a spectrum of colors from blue (0 strains) to red (50 strains). Credit: Houston Methodist/University of Texas at Austin.

The paper shows the virus is mutating due to a combination of neutral drift—random genetic changes taking place within the virus itself—as well as immune system resistance, said Ilya Finkelstein, associate professor of molecular biosciences at The University of Texas and co-author of the study conducted by scientists at Houston Methodist Hospital, UT Austin, and elsewhere.

During the first wave of the pandemic, 71% of the CoViD-19 virus identified in Houston patients was found to be of the D614G strain. When the second wave hit Houston during the summer of 2020, the D614G variant had overtaken its predecessor, displaying a 99.9% prevalence, mirroring a worldwide trend. A study published in July of 2020, based on a survey of more than 28,000 genome sequences, found that it had only taken a month for variants carrying the D614G mutation to become the globally dominant SARS-CoV-2 version.

What scientists want to know is how did strains containing this mutation become the strongest in the survival of the fittest? One explanation is that the more recent variant had become more contagious. A study of more than 25,000 genome sequences in the U.K. found that viruses containing the mutation were more pathogenic, resulting in larger infection clusters. Most scientists are of the opinion that natural selection tends to favor more pathogenic strains of the virus emerging, but not all scientists are on board with that notion. Some have suggested that “founder’s effects” might be a more plausible explanation. If that is the case, then the D614G variant might have been more common in the first viruses to arrive in Europe and North America, gaining a foothold before other strains reached those shores.

It is believed that the spike protein continued to develop further mutations the significance of which could not be determined. The Houston Methodist-UT Austin team also conducted lab experiments to show that the D614G variant allows the spike to evade a neutralizing antibody meant to fight SARS-CoV-2 infections. This may allow that variant to more easily fly under the immune system’s radar.

While apparently more pathogenic, there is no evidence that the D614G strain is more virulent. According to Finkelstein, the group has not yet run into viruses that are able to evade first-generation vaccines and therapeutic antibody formulations. “The virus continues to mutate as it rips through the world,” Finkelstein said. “Real-time surveillance efforts like our study will ensure that global vaccines and therapeutics are always one step ahead.”

The scientists noted a total of 285 mutations across thousands of infections, though most don’t appear to amplify the virulence. There are ongoing studies being conducted on the third wave of CoViD-19 patients, analyzing how the virus is mutating in order to circumvent antibody defenses of the immune system. Each new infection offers a chance for the virus to develop more dangerous mutations. At some point, the genetic sequence will find the right combination of GTCA coding to hit the jackpot, resulting in a more pathogenic and virulent strain.

The UT Austin team tested different genetic variants of the virus’s spike protein in order to determine the protein’s stability and assess its efficiency in binding to receptors on host cells. Earlier in the year, McLellan and his team at UT Austin, in collaboration with researchers at the National Institute of Health, developed the first 3-D map of the CoViD-19 spike protein with the hope of developing an effective vaccine.

Researchers found that SARS-CoV-2 was introduced to the Houston locale from diverse geographic regions multiple times, including strains from Europe, Asia, South America, and other parts of the U.S. The variant seems to have dispersed widely within the community soon after CoViD-19 cases were reported in Houston.iv

While some studies have shown the SARS-CoV-2 virus increasing in pathogenicity, other studies are showing that it may be increasing in virulence as well. Researchers at Michigan State University developed a model machine learning application that suggests mutations of the SARS-CoV-2 genome may have increased in virulence. The model conducted a comparative analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 genotype in more than 20,000 viral genome samples. The researchers analyzed mutations of the spike protein, and found that five out of six known virus subtypes have been found to be more pathogenic.

As with any virus, many mutations are ultimately benign, posing little risk to infected patients, some actually reducing its pathogenicity surprisingly. However, some mutations are known to lead to a more pathogenic or virulent virus.

The team at Michigan State University studied and analyzed mutation patterns and locations, tracking the changes resulting in newer strains diverging from the official viral genome sample isolated in January of 2020.

“Knowledge about the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 is a vital factor for preventive measurements against CoViD-19 and reopening the global economy,” the head researcher said. “A crucial question is what are the ramifications of these mutations to CoViD-19 transmission, diagnostics, prevention and treatment.”

It is believed that CoViD-19 infection occurs when the spike protein interacts with a human host cell receptor called angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). As it interacts with ACE2, scientists worry about the degree of “binding affinity” that occurs between the spike protein and host receptor during the initial stage of infection.

“Viral infectivity increases if the binding affinity strengthens,” the head researcher maintained. “Currently, more than 50 mutations have been found along with the binding interface on the spike proteins receptor-binding domain—RBD for short—which has 194 possible mutation sites.”

The team’s machine learning model, an advanced neural network, analyzed more than 8,000 protein interaction records to assess the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binding affinity found in the most recent mutations. The results showed increased binding affinity in five of the six known subtypes, suggesting mutations may have led to increased infectivity, making the newer variants more pathogenic.

Concerned about the possibility of further mutation, the team applied their model to predicting potential future outcomes. “It’s extremely important to know whether future SARS-CoV-2 subtypes would pose an imminent danger to public health,” the head researcher said. “To this end, we have conducted a systematic screening of all possible 3,686 future mutations on 194 possible mutation sites along the RBD.”

The team’s model predicts that multiple residues on the receptor-binding structure—a component area of the RBD—have a greater chance of producing more infectious CoViD-19 mutations. The head researcher cautions that, though computer modeling can show consistencies with experimental findings, further studies are needed to fully understand impacts of mutations on CoViD-19 infectivity.

As part of their research, the team also predict that SARS-CoV-2 will prove to be slightly more infectious than the original SARS virus isolated in 2003. The head researcher said the study results match the findings of researchers at the Scripps Research Institute in Florida. This study examined spike protein mutations in a laboratory setting and found that the mutations are producing more pathogenic strains in more recent variants.v

Current observations suggest that SARS-CoV-2 causes severe symptoms mainly in elderly patients suffering from chronic disease. However, when two pairs of previously healthy young brothers from two families required mechanical ventilation at the intensive care unit in rapid succession, medical professionals at Radboud University Medical Center wondered if genetic factors might have played a role in crippling their immune systems. Research identified the gene TLR7 as a major player in the body’s immune response to SARS-CoV-2.

Amid the wave of CoViD-19 patients flooding Dutch hospitals in early 2020, two young brothers had to be mechanically ventilated in the ICU. One of them died, while the other recovered. The fact the disease had struck these healthy young brothers so severely was a rare occurrence, especially considering that, at that early stage of the pandemic, the elderly had seemed more susceptible and vulnerable to the virus. This prompted an attentive physician from the department of clinical genetics to take a closer look. She and her team tried to determine what made the two young brothers so susceptible.

Soon after, doctors and researchers at Radboudumc encountered another pair of brothers who had also been ravaged by the disease. Again, both brothers were under 35, and like the former pair, they had also been placed on ventilators. Hoischen explains:

Then the question of the role of genetics became even more obvious. We also investigated the genetic code of these two brothers, again via the ‘rapid-clinical exome’ method. This time we saw no deletion, no loss of letters, but a single spelling mistake of one DNA-letter of the TRL7 gene. The effect on the gene is the same, however, because these brothers also do not make sufficient functional TLR7 protein. Suddenly we had four young people with a defect in the same gene, all of whom had fallen seriously ill from the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Essential Role in the Defense

Van der Made and colleagues have investigated the consequences of improper functioning of the TLR7 receptor, a problem for which he offers the following explanation:

Once activated, TLR7 triggers the production of so-called interferons, signaling proteins that are essential in the defense against virus infections,” says van der Made. “This immune response is perhaps all the more important in the fight against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, because we know from the literature that the virus has tricks to reduce the production of interferons by immune cells. When we mimic an infection with the coronavirus, we see that immune cells of the patients without properly functioning TLR7 hardly respond, and that minimal amounts of interferons are produced. These tests make it clear that the virus appears to have free rein in people without properly functioning TLR7 because it [the virus] is not recognized by the immune system.

Due to the serious illness of four brothers in two families, so serious that it cost one of the young men his life, we have discovered this condition. It seems to be a very specific abnormality, an immunodeficiency, which is mainly related to this coronavirus. None of the four men have previously suffered from immune-related diseases. It is the first time that we can connect a clinical phenomenon so strongly with TLR7.

“This discovery not only provides us with more insight into the fundamental workings of the immune system, but it may also have important consequences for the treatment of severely ill CoViD-19 patients,” says Frank van de Veerdonk, immunologist and infectiologist. “The substance interferon can be given as a therapy. It is currently being investigated whether administering interferon in CoViD-19 can indeed help.”

This confirms that genetic defects in some genomes do make certain patients more vulnerable to the ravages of the disease. There are a variety of reasons for this, but it can generally be deduced that the immune response may be less efficient due to the genetic makeup of certain patients. This discourse will delve into several examples of this. Sadly, like many diseases, there seems to be a separating of the wheat from the chaff, a kind of natural selection process that is taking out those with a less vigorous and robust constitution, or less efficient immune system, so that in the end, only the strongest appear immune or more likely to

There is an additional perhaps more worrying aspect of this problem in that the disease seems to be chewing at the bottom end of the evolutionary tree, such that those with a high ratio of Neanderthal and Denisovan genetics in their genome are more vulnerable to the disease. This suggests the possibility that viruses may play an inherent role in natural selection and deselection, in the sense that whole genomic profiles could be removed from the tree of life known as the human gene pool.

It would appear from the foregoing that genetic variability in the human immune system may affect susceptibility to the disease, as well as severity of infection for those who contract SARS-CoV-2. Research into this question has been published in the Journal of Virology, a publication of the American Society for Microbiology.

The study into individual genetic variation may account for the effectiveness of various immune responses. It has been discovered that certain immune system genes called human leukocyte antigen genes, involved in recognizing pathogens, tend to vary in terms of their effectiveness from person to person. Genetic variations in individuals appears to have an effect on how well the immune system recognizes a given pathogen. Poor recognition of SARS-CoV-2, where the virus fails to show up on the body’s immune system radar, could make a person more vulnerable to attack by the virus.

“In particular, understanding how variation in HLA [a component of the immune system containing multiple genes] may affect the course of CoViD-19 could help identify individuals at higher risk from the disease,” the authors of the study claim. The authors showed that individual HLA, haplotype, and full genotype variability most likely have a bearing on the individual patient’s capacity to fight off SARS-CoV-2 infection. The authors also note that certain alleles could be associated with more severe infection. To understand what is meant by “alleles,” picture red and white flowers and the combinations of colors they produce generationally. At times, a pink hybrid, or some other color variant, will skip a generation or two and show up in a subsequent generation. The same anomalies determine variations in the genetic disposition of humans, and one’s allele can have an effect on how vigorously one’s immune system is able to fight off SARS CoV-2. “This is the first study to report global distributions of HLA types and haplotypes with potential epidemiological ramifications in the setting of the current pandemic,” write the authors, from Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, and the Portland VA Research Foundation.

The authors show that individual HLA haplotype, and full genotype variability probably have a strong impact on the patient’s capacity to respond to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and note that certain alleles in particular could contribute to more severe infection, as had previously been shown with SARS-CoV.

“HLA typing can be fast and inexpensive,” the authors write. “Pairing HLA typing with COVID-19 testing where feasible could improve assessment of viral severity in the population. Following the development of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, individuals with high-risk HLA types could be prioritized for vaccination.”

Once again there is evidence that genetics plays a role in who might have greater susceptibility to the ravages of CoViD-19. The immune response of some patients has been shown to be more efficient than others, and in many cases, a common denominator has been found in certain features of the genomes of those affected. This is an important discovery, and may point to the role viruses play in evolution, as there are indications that patients who suffer from low IQ levels, obesity, diabetes, and other comorbidity factors, turn out to be more susceptible to infection, have weaker immune responses, and have less chance of survival and recovery than people who are genetically and medically sounder. This could point to two possibilities: either God is a eugenicist or some men in lab coats working in some bioweapon facility, engineered a gain-of-function bioweapon to take out the less constitutionally fit and genetically sound.vii

In the competition for survival between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens, were we Homo sapiens the fittest and therefore the ones to survive, leaving our Neanderthal cousins in the dust, or is it more accurate to suggest that we interbred, so that, to an extent, they became us, and we, them? And what of the impossibly singular Mitochondrial Eve, her contemporary Y-chromosome Adam, and the African origin hypothesis? Are these valid theories or simply convenient fictions devised by paleogeneticists to grant their largely arbitrary haplotype classifications greater credence, and their complementary evolutionary trees greater validity?

Svante Pääbo, director of the genetics department at the Max Planck Institute, certainly believes that Homo sapiens Neanderthalensis, or just Homo Neanderthalensis, if you prefer, is extinct. Pääbo, the son of 1982 Noble laureate Sune Bergström, has made a career out of studying Neanderthal bones, finding every gene sequence to be distinctly Neanderthal in nature. In 1997, Pääbo successfully sequenced mitochondrial DNA from a specimen found in the Feldhofer grotto in the Neander valley.

Amazing as it sounds, it is possible that the coronavirus may play a role in settling the issue of what became of our Neanderthal cousins, and whether we blended our genome with theirs or not. As discovered by Pääbo and his colleague, Hugo Zeberg, the major genetic risk factor for developing severe CoViD-19 infection is inherited from Neanderthals. The team found that severe CoViD-19 infection is associated with specific genetic variants in six genes within a 50K-base-pair-long region of chromosome 3 that shows direct Neanderthal descent. Similar investigations have also identified a protective Neanderthal haplotype found on chromosome (chr) 12 that reduces the risk of contracting severe CoViD-19, and a protective region on chromosome 9 that is associated with the ABO blood groups.

Pääbo and Zeberg recently reported that another exclusively Neanderthal variant found in the promoter region of the DPP4 gene, at chr2q24.2, is the Achille’s heel in terms of CoViD-19 susceptibility. DPP4 is a widely expressed extracellular dipeptide peptidase tied to immune function and glucose metabolism. As it happens, DPP4 is also the receptor gene for the MERS coronavirus. This common denominator between the MERS virus and the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus provides a clue to where the weak point in the genetic chain is that causes some to be more susceptible to infection than others.

Although other researchers have insisted DPP4 is not a SARS-CoV-2 receptor, inhibitors of DPP4 already used clinically to treat diabetes appear to have effects on CoViD-19 patients. Genetic research into SARS has revealed that a handful of immune-associated gene variants, including IFNAR2 and TYK2, happen to have an influence on CoViD-19 susceptibility. It happens that this study also identified DDP9, a sister gene of DD4 found at chr19p13.3, as a key mediator of inflammatory lung injury. DPP9 shows a similar serine protease activity to DPP4, but differs in not being membrane-bound.

The DPP4 gene is located fairly close to a long-defunct remnant centromere found nearby in the chr2q21.3–q22.1 region. There is also a vestigial telomere found in the q13 band. It begs the question as to what purpose these structures actually serve. A plausible answer is that fusion of two small ape chromosomes has occurred to produce the human chr2. Do Neandertals have a fused chr2? It turns out that they actually do.

Not only that, but they seem to have the same version of the speech gene, FOXP2, which Pääbo identified in 2002. Human FOXP2, which differs from the chimp version in two key places, was famously mutated in the “KE” family from Britain, who all happened to express a specific disability in their use of consonants. In the more recent CoViD-19 risk factor study, Pääbo searched for single nucleotide polymorphisms using data from the 1000 Genomes Project, then checked with the CoViD-19 Host Genetics Initiative to see if Neanderthal haplotypes for DDP4 had any association with disease severity.

The problem with this line of inquiry is that we don’t have that much sequence data to tell us what makes a Neanderthal by definition what it is. There are only a few good genomes available from skeletal remains 120,000 years old and 50,000 years old, respectively, all of which come from Europe and southern Siberia.

If it has done anything, the CoViD-19 epidemic has exposed the fact that blind medicine is no longer satisfactory. Blind medicine refers to analysis done in the absence of personal patient sequence data. When genomics data is given with respect to a reference sequence, problems frequently arise. This is due to the fact that there is no such thing as a reference sequence, as it too is completely arbitrary. Updates and improvements are occasionally made to various reference sequences, but no true reference sequence will ever be available.

In contrast to the MERS DPP4 receptor, no ACE2 receptor variants have been isolated as a risk factor for severe CoViD-19 infection. However, many of the other genes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and its life cycle have been discovered. For example, four variants—rs464397, rs469390, rs2070788 and rs383510—robustly affect expression of the TMPRSS2 serine protease in lung tissue. TMPRSS2-unregulating variants tend to be found at higher frequencies in European and American populations than in their Asian counterparts.

Perhaps of more immediate concern, now that vaccines are becoming available, is who among its recipients, is the vaccine likely to prove beneficial or harmful to. The latter prospect is usually explained as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). As for diseases like Dengue fever or respiratory syncytial virus, ADE is taken very seriously, though ADE is usually dismissed out of hand in discussions of CoViD-19. However, recent research now suggests that ADE is very much a problem in the case of CoViD-19 patients.

In particular, researchers have found that some anti-spike monoclonal antibodies from CoViD-19 patients—particularly those meant to oppose the N-terminal-domain (NTD) of the spike—dramatically enhanced the binding capacity to ACE2, thereby enhancing SARS-CoV-2 infectivity. Mutational analysis was able to pinpoint a specific surface region of the NTD, revealing that those patients taking part in the study had antibodies against this infectivity-enhancing site. As information about spike sequence mutations and ADE risk factors were updated much faster than vaccine development times, it is important for the public to get information about the mRNA vaccines currently on offer. Namely, what exact spike sequences is the vaccine meant to replicate in order to generate an antibody response?

There are serious concerns among some medical professionals and epidemiologists that the mRNA vaccines could produce autoimmune disease in patients. The belief is that, by reprogramming cells to produce similar spike proteins to those of the virus, it is hoped it will program an antibody response toward the spike proteins in the CoViD-19 virus itself. The problem is that the spike proteins produced by the cell by means of the transcription and translation instructions received from the RNA, as programmed by the mRNA vaccine, will cause these spike proteins to proliferate and embed themselves in blood vessel walls and in the healthy cell tissue of the heart, lungs and other organs, prompting the antibodies to mobilize and go on the offensive to attack such sites, causing them to attack the body’s organs, cell tissue and even the protective lining of blood vessels, resulting in blood clots, hemorrhaging, internal bleeding, and cardio-pulmonary disease.

Recent reports of new proliferations of spike mutants have raised further questions. How could the vaccine-evading N501Y variant in the receptor binding domain or the double-NTD-deletion variants constitute possible game-changers in the fight against CoViD-19? Or how does the new D614G spike variant, alleged to confer more efficient replication, affect the pathogenicity of the virus? These are serious questions that must be addressed.viii

Many scientists now believe that genes that some people have inherited from their Neanderthal ancestors may significantly increase their likelihood of suffering severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. As has been argued, the disease seems to be ravaging the lower end of the evolutionary tree, chewing on haplotypes with a high Denisovan or Neanderthal genomic profile. Such haplotypes have been found to be quite prevalent in Far East Asia and South Asia, as well as among Brazilians, and aboriginal populations in the Americas. Once this is considered, it raises provocative questions about the true purpose of the caste system in the Hindu religious culture of India. There is no doubt that the caste system of India was meant to enforce a code of racial hygiene intended to protect the Aryan population base of the higher Brahman caste. Is it possible that Hindu gurus and adepts recognized that racial hygiene was necessary in order to protect the constitutional health of the Brahmin caste by preventing their haplotype from being tainted by constitutionally less vigorous genomes?

A study by European scientists published in the journal Nature examined a cluster of genes that have been linked to a higher risk of hospitalization and respiratory failure in patients infected by CoViD-19.

Zeberg and Paabo, in particular, have concluded from their research that the genes in question belong to a genetic haplotype group, which likely came from Neanderthals. The haplotype is present in about 16% of the European population and approximately 50% of South Asians, while in Africa and East Asia it is virtually non-existent.

It has been established that modern humans and Neanderthals have interbred at various points in history, resulting in an exchange of genes than can still be found in certain human populations today. The genes are one of several risk factors for CoViD-19 patients, including age, sex, and pre-existing conditions like obesity, diabetes, and heart problems.

Zeberg and Paabo noted that the prevalence of the particular Neanderthal gene group is highest in people from Bangladesh, where 63% are estimated to carry a copy of the haplotype. And this has led this author to an interesting parallel between the susceptibility of Bangladeshis to CoViD-19 infection and the infection rate found in a segment of the South Asian immigrant population found in the Toronto satellite town of Brampton, which has experienced a high incident rate of CoViD-19 infection, and which just happens to have a high ratio of immigrants from Bangladesh.

Image is Available in PDF Format

These genetic variants are almost completely absent in Africa and occur in the highest frequency in Bangladesh. Credit: Professor Svante Pääbo and Professor Hugo Zeberg/Nature

Zeberg and Paabo cited studies from the UK, which show that people of Bangladeshi descent have roughly two times greater chance of dying from CoViD-19 as the general population. “It is striking that the genetic heritage from the Neanderthals has such tragic consequences during the current pandemic,” Paabo recently observed. “Why this is must now be investigated as quickly as possible.”

However, despite Paabo’s call to action, Andre Franke, director of the Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology at the University of Kiel, Germany, said the findings have no immediate effect on the approach medical professionals will adopt in treating CoViD-19. Franke did suggest, however, that one interesting question arising from the study is why this particular haploytpe—unlike most Neanderthal genes—has managed to survive until now. “Perhaps it’s good for a very active immune system if one doesn’t have other risk factors,” he observed.ix

In concurrence with the findings of Zeberg and Paabo, it has been discovered that an area in the north corner of Brampton, a satellite city of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, has a shockingly high 19% CoViD-19 positive test rate, and holds the lead in the Greater Toronto urban zones that are witnessing alarming numbers of positive cases. Peel Region is showing a positivity rate of 9.8%—the highest in the GTA—while neighborhoods in western Toronto, Scarborough, and southern York Region are also reporting high rates. In one area of Brampton north of Queen St. E. and east of Airport Rd., one in five people have tested positive for the virus, which is five times higher than the average for the whole province of Ontario. The Brampton neighborhood with the highest positivity rate includes a number of small geographical areas defined by Statistics Canada. Of these zones, nine had infection rates of 200 per 100,000 people in November 2020, according to Peel Region Public Health, five times the infection rate required to move an area into the province’s ‘red’ or ‘control’ zone, which would require stringent lockdown measures.

It also happens that this area has Peel Region’s highest proportion of large households, with 49% of homes occupied by five or more people. Peel shows a house occupancy rate higher than Toronto or Ottawa, according to medical officer of health, Dr. Lawrence Loh. Additionally, household contacts have accounted for 40% of the CoViD-19 cases in most recent data collection efforts. As a result, the government implemented plans to build a facility in the area to house people who cannot properly self-isolate in their own homes. This area of Brampton is also densely populated with essential workers. One community of about 2,360 residents has Peel’s highest proportion of people working in the manufacturing sector, with 22% of residents drawing their living from this industry.

Just north of this area is another census zone with Peel’s highest level of retail workers at 16%, and with the lowest level of education, where 60% of residents possess no post-secondary school education. The community of 7,000 reported 66 cases of CoViD-19 in the first three weeks of November 2020. Its infection rate at the time was recorded as 285 cases per 100,000. These are racialized neighborhoods, where there are significant levels of poverty and overcrowding. There are also a significant number of essential workers who are low salary earners and can’t afford to stay home, according to Colin Furness, an infection control epidemiologist at the University of Toronto.

While the government is addressing the health concerns in the area responsibly, with mobile testing and isolation measures, the rising number of cases is still cause for concern. Should people test positive, they stay in hotel rooms, where they receive free food and care. There are even initiatives to provide financial incentives for people to come in and get tested in a move to stave off the spread of infection.x

What is not mentioned by any of the epidemiologists or specialists studying the problem is the genetic factor. Some studies indicate that the virus is attacking people with certain genetic profiles. Low IQ has come up as a factor in some studies. However, in this particular case, the affected area of Brampton with the highest incidence of CoViD-19 infection has a high percentage of Bangladeshis, who just happen to have a high ratio of Neanderthal genetics in their genome. Some will find such information politically incorrect to share, but the point of transparency in all issues is that “the truth shall set us free.” Concealing or covering up the truth invariably leads to more problems than it solves. Unless we can openly discuss these issues and all related ramifications, we are not going to find the solutions to stop the spread of such diseases. We have to cure ourselves of the phobias, cultural stigmas, and biases first before we can succeed in defeating this and other contagious diseases. What is most medieval in our society is the taboos that prevent the truth from being shared and openly discussed, and there is really no place for that kind of adolescent behavior if we hope to build a more progressive society in the 21st century, unless of course the majority prefer to be regressive, in which case, God help us.

Census data presents clues for why the positivity rates have such a high spike in this community, which just happens to have a high concentration of visible minorities, especially South Asians. Socioeconomic data shows that South Asians have been disproportionately hard hit by CoViD-19 in Peel Region, accounting for 45% of cases while comprising only 32% of the region’s population.

A recent genetic association study has identified a gene cluster on chromosome 3 as a risk factor in respiratory failure following infection by the severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS-CoV-2. A separate study—CoViD-19 Host Genetics Initiative—comprising 3,199 hospitalized patients with CoViD-19 and control individuals, showed that this cluster is the major genetic risk factor for those suffering from severe symptoms related to SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization. The risk is conferred by a genomic segment of around 50 kilobases in size inherited from Neanderthals and is carried by around 50% of people from South Asia and around 16% of Europeans.

The CoViD-19 pandemic has caused a considerable degree of infection and mortality, with some statistical data suggesting it has resulted in the death of over a million people worldwide by early 2021. Although it is hard to trust the accuracy of such statistics, since they have been greatly exaggerated by the fact that many families of deceased patients are encouraged to lie, attributing their relative’s death to CoViD-19 as opposed to the true cause of death, since both the hospital and the patient’s family receive money payouts whenever CoViD is identified as the cause of illness and death.

The clinical manifestations of the disease caused by the virus, SARS-CoV-2, vary widely in severity, ranging from an absence of symptoms to mild symptoms to rapid progression to respiratory failure. Early in the ‘pandemic,’ it became clear that old age was a major risk factor. Another increased risk factor was being of the male sex. In addition, some co-morbidity factors such as diabetes or obesity proved a danger and quite often increased the risk of fatality from CoViD-19 infection. These risk factors, however, do not fully explain why some people have a complete absence of symptoms or relatively mild symptoms, while others experience severe symptoms. It has therefore been postulated that genetic risk factors may play a role in disease progression. A previous study identified two genomic regions associated with severe CoViD-19 infection: one region on chromosome 3 containing six genes, and one region on chromosome 9 that determines ABO blood groups. Recently, a dataset was released by the CoViD-19 Host Genetics Initiative, in which a region on chromosome 3 was identified as the only region found to bear a significant relationship to severe CoViD-19 at the genome-wide level. The risk variant in this region has been blamed for an odds ratio requiring hospitalization of 1.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.42–1.79).

Figure Image is Available in PDF Format

Fig. 1: Genetic variants associated with severe CoViD-19

In figure 1 above, a, shows a Manhattan plot of a genome-wide association study of 3,199 hospitalized patients with CoViD-19 and 897,488 population controls. The dash line indicates genome-wide significance (P = 5 × 10−8). Data were modified from the CoViD-19 Host Genetics Initiative2. Figure b shows a linkage disequilibrium between the index risk variant (rs35044562) and genetic variants in the 1000 Genomes Project. Red circles indicate genetic variants for which the alleles are correlated to the risk variant (r2 > 0.1), where risk alleles just happen to match the Vindija 33.19 Neanderthal genome. The core Neanderthal haplotype (r2 > 0.98) is indicated by a black bar. Some individuals carry longer Neanderthal-like haplotypes. The location of the genes in the region are indicated below using standard gene symbols. The x axis shows hg19 coordinates.

The genetic variants found to have the strongest connection with severe CoViD-19 on chromosome 3 (45,859,651–45,909,024 (hg19)) are all in high linkage disequilibrium (LD)—which means they are all strongly associated with each other in the population (r2 > 0.98)—and span 49.4 thousand bases (kb). This core haplotype has been found to express a weaker linkage disequilibrium with longer haplotypes of up to 333.8 kb (r2 > 0.32). Some long haplotypes have entered the genome of modern humans from Neanderthals or Denisovans, extinct hominins that contributed genetic variants to the ancestors of present-day humans around 40,000–60,000 years ago. This prompted the authors of the study to investigate and verify whether the haplotype did indeed come from Neanderthals or Denisovans.

The index variants of the two studies are in high linkage disequilibrium (r2 > 0.98) in non-African populations. We found that the risk alleles of both of these variants are present in a homozygous form in the genome of the Vindija 33.19 Neanderthal, a Neanderthal found to be approximately 50,000 years old from Croatia in southern Europe. Of the 13 single nucleotides polymorphisms constituting the core haplotype, 11 occur in a homozygous form in the Vindija 33.19 Neanderthal. Three of these variants occur in the Altai and Chagyrskaya 8 Neanderthals, both of whom come from the Altai Mountains in southern Siberia and are estimated to be 120,000 and 60,000 years old, respectively, whereas none of the variants occur in the Denisovan genome. In the 333.8-kb haplotype, the alleles associated with risk of acquiring severe CoViD-19 similarly match alleles in the genome of the Vindija 33.19 Neanderthal. It has therefore been found that the risk haplotype is similar to the corresponding genomic region in the Neanderthal from Croatia and less similar to its counterpart from Siberia.

The investigation then led to an examination of whether the core 49.4-kb haplotype might be inherited by both Neanderthals and present-day people from the common ancestors of the two groups that lived about 0.5 million years ago. The longer a present-day human haplotype has been shared with Neanderthals the less it is that it orginated from a common ancestor, because recombination in each generation would tend to break up haplotypes into smaller segments. Assuming a generational time of 29 years, with the local recombination rate (0.53 cM per Mb), a split between Neanderthals and modern humans is thought to have occurred 550,000 years ago, while interbreeding between the two groups is found to have occurred around 50,000 years ago. Using a published equation, the authors of the study have chosen to exclude the possibility that the Neanderthal-like haplotype has been derived from the common ancestor (P = 0.0009). As for the 333.8-kb-long Neanderthal-like haplotype, the probability of an origin from the common ancestral population is even lower (P = 1.6 × 10−26). The risk haplotype contributing to CoViD-19 susceptibility thus entered the modern human population from Neanderthals. This finding concurs with several previous studies, which have identified gene flow from Neanderthals in particular chromosomal regions. The close relationship of the risk haplotype to the Vindija 33.19 Neanderthal is compatible with this Neanderthal being closer to the majority of the Neanderthals who contributed DNA to present-day humans than the other two Neanderthals.

A Neanderthal haplotype found in the genomes of present-day humans is expected to express greater similarity to a Neanderthal genome than to other haplotypes in the current human population. In order to investigate the relationship of the 49.4-kb haplotype to Neanderthal and other human haplotypes, the authors of the study analyzed all 5,008 haplotypes in the 1000 Genomes Project for this genomic region. They included all relevant positions found in the Neanderthal genomes and excluded variants found on only one chromosome and haplotypes seen only once in the 1000 Genomes Project data. The results of the study revealed that there were 253 present-day haplotypes containing 450 variable positions. There is a related phylogeny in the haplotypes that were found more than 10 times. The authors of the study found that all risk haplotypes associated with severe CoViD-19 form a species’ clade featuring the three high-coverage Neanderthal genomes. This clade is found to be most closely related to the Vindija 33.19 Neanderthal.

Figure Image is Available in PDF Format

Fig. 2: Phylogeny relating the DNA sequences that covers the core Neanderthal haplotype in individuals from the 1000 Genomes Project and Neanderthals

The colored area in the chart above shows the haplotypes that carry the risk allele at rs35044562, which just happen to be the risk haplotypes for severe CoViD-19. Arabic numbers indicate bootstrap support (100 replicates). The phylogeny is rooted with the inferred ancestral sequence of present-day humans. The three Neanderthal genomes carry no heterozygous positions in this region. The scale bar shows the number of substitutions per nucleotide position.

Among the individuals in the 1000 Genomes Project, the Neanderthal-derived haplotypes are almost completely absent from Africa, which is consistent with the theory that gene flow from Neanderthals into African populations was limited and probably indirectly infused from western migratory population inflows from the Altai Mountains region. The Neanderthal core haplotype occurs in the South Asian population with an allele frequency of 30%, an allele frequency of 8% in the European population, an allele frequency of 4% among admixed Americans, and with lower allele frequency levels found in East Asia. In terms of carrier frequencies, 50% of people in South Asia were found to carry at least one copy of the risk haplotype, whereas 16% of Europeans and 9% of admixed Americans were found to carry at least one copy of the risk haplotype. The highest carrier frequency occurs in Bangladesh, where more than half the population (63%) carries at least one copy of the Neanderthal risk haplotype, and where 13% is found to be homozygous for the haplotype. The Neanderthal haplotype can therefore be considered a substantial risk factor in CoViD-19 susceptibility, in addition to other probability factors, including old age. Immigrants of Bangledeshi origin living in the UK have a two times higher risk of mortality from CoViD-19 infection than the general population (hazard ratio of 2.0, 95% confidence interval, 1.7–2.4).

Figure Image is Available in PDF Format

Fig. 3: Geographical distribution of the Neanderthal core haplotype that confers risk of severe CoViD-19 infection

The pie charts show the minor allele frequency at rs35044562. Frequency data were obtained from the 1000 Genomes Project. Map source data were obtained from OpenStreetMap.

It is notable that the Neanderthal risk haplotype occurs at a frequency of 30% in South Asia, whereas it is almost absent in East Asia. This disparity in allele frequencies between South and East Asia is unusual (P = 0.006) and indicates that it may have been affected by selection in the past. Indeed, previous studies have suggested that the Neanderthal haplotype has been positively selected in Bangladesh. One possible explanation for this could be that it may have afforded protection against other pathogens. It is also possible that the haplotype has decreased in frequency in East Asia due to negative selection, perhaps because of coronaviruses or other pathogens eliminating whole pockets of population. In any case, the CoViD-19 risk haplotype on chromosome 3 is similar to some other Neanderthal and Denisovan genetic variants that have achieved high rates of incidents in some populations. This is owing to positive selection or drift, but it is now under negative selection as a result of the CoViD-19 pandemic.

It is currently not known what feature in the Neanderthal-derived region confers risk of severe CoViD-19 infection, and whether the effects of such features are specific to SARS-CoV-2, other coronaviruses, or other pathogens. Once the relevant genetic feature is identified, it may be possible to speculate about the susceptibility of Neanderthals to relevant pathogens. However, with respect to the current pandemic, it is clear that those with strong Neanderthal genetic profiles appear to have a quite tragic Achilles’s heel.xi

Breeding Between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals

Based on the gene sequences found in the genome of modern humans, it is fairly conclusive that our ancestors had encounters with Neanderthals, and that sexual congress it thought to have occurred in some cases. This is thought to have taken place between 37,000-42,000 years ago.

In February 2002, two explorers made an extraordinary discovery in an underground cave system in the southwestern Carpathian Mountains, near the Romanian town of Anina. Gaining access to this cave complex was no easy matter. First, the explorers had to wade in an underground river up to their necks for 200m (656ft), a haunting experience that must have made them wonder if they has traversing the River Styx and in the midst of crossing over to the other side. Then came a scuba dive for 30m (98ft) along an underwater passage, followed by a 300-metre (984ft) ascent up to the “mouse hole,” an opening through which they entered a newly discovered chamber.

Inside the Peştera cu Oase (Cave with Bones), they found thousands of mammalian bones. Over its long history, the cave was thought to have been inhabited mainly by male cave bears—extinct relatives of the modern brown bear. Among these bones, they discovered a human jawbone, which radiocarbon dating revealed to be from one of the oldest known early hominids in Europe.

Image is Available in PDF Format

The site of the discovery in the Southern Carpathian Mountains (Credit: NPL/Alamy)

Scientists have noted that, while the jawbone was unmistakeably modern in appearance, it also contained some unusual, Neanderthal-like features, a conjecture that was later confirmed. When scientists analyzed DNA from the jawbone in 2015, they found that, not only was the individual male, but was likely to have been 6-9% Neanderthal. This is the highest concentration ever found in the skeletal remains of an early modern human, and around three times the amount found in present-day Europeans and Asians, whose genetic makeup is estimated to be about 1-3% Neanderthal.

Because the genome contained large stretches of uninterrupted Neanderthal sequences, the authors of the study calculated that the jawbone’s owner is likely to have had a Neanderthal ancestor as recently as four to six generations back, equivalent to a great-great-great-great grandparent.

In addition to the jawbone, the team found skull fragments from another individual at Peştera cu Oase, who possessed a similar mixture of features. Scientists have not yet been able to extract DNA from these remains, but like the owner of the jawbone, it is thought that this individual may have had a very recent Neanderthal forebear.

Since then, there has been a growing body of evidence that sex between early modern humans and Neanderthals was a relatively common occurrence. Hidden in the genomes of present-day human populations, there are tell-tale signs that sexual liaisons between the two hominid populations happened frequently across a wide geographical area. To this day, there are people carrying genetic material from at least two different populations of Neanderthals, which one analysis suggests interbred with humans on several occasions in both Asia and Europe.

In fact, Neanderthal DNA can be found in every human being living today, including people of African descent, whose ancestors are believed to have had no direct contact with Neanderthals. In fact, in this case, the transfer of Neanderthal genetics is thought to have happened through indirect contact resulting from waves of migrations from the Altai Mountain region. In 2016, scientists discovered that Neanderthals from the Altai mountains in Siberia may have shared 1-7% of their genetics with the ancestors of modern humans, who lived roughly 100,000 years ago.

Male or Female Neanderthals

It’s impossible to say for certain whether it was mostly female Neanderthals scoring with early modern human males, or the other way around, but there is some evidence of sex occurring between the two species.

In 2008, archaeologists discovered a broken finger bone and single molar tooth in the Denisova Cave in Russia’s Altai Mountains, providing evidence for a brand-new subspecies of humans. For years, the “Denisovans” were known only from the handful of samples unearthed at this site, along with their DNA, from which scientists discovered that their legacy continues to this day in the genomes of people of East Asian and Melanesian descent.

Denisovans were a lot more closely related to Neanderthals than present-day humans; the two subspecies may have had ranges that overlapped in Asia for hundreds of thousands of years. This became particularly apparent in 2018, with the discovery of a bone fragment belonging to a young girl who scientists nicknamed ‘Denny’, who had a Neanderthal mother and Denisovan father.

Consequently, it would make sense if the male sex chromosomes of Neanderthals resembled those of Denisovans. But when scientists sequenced the DNA from three Neanderthals, who lived 38,000-53,000 years ago, they were surprised to discover that their Y chromosomes had more in common with those of present-day humans.

The researchers say this is evidence of “strong gene flow” between Neanderthals and early modern humans, suggesting that interbreeding between the species had become so common that, as Neanderthal numbers dropped to the point of extinction, their Y chromosomes may have been completely subsumed by ours, suggesting a form of extinction resulting from genetic assimilation. This suggests that a substantial number of ancestral human men were having sex with female Neanderthals.

But the story doesn’t end there. Other research has shown that almost exactly the same fate befell Neanderthal mitochondria—organelles found within cells that help turn sugars into useable energy. These are exclusively passed down from mothers to their children, so when early modern human mitochondria were found in Neanderthal remains in 2017, it hinted that our ancestors were also having sex with male Neanderthals. This time, the interbreeding is likely to have happened between 270,000 and 100,000 years ago, when humans were mostly confined to Africa.

What STD Infection Patterns Among Ancient Ancestors Reveal

A few years ago, Ville Pimenoff was studying the sexually transmitted infection human papillomavirus (HPV) when he discovered that there are more than 100 different strains believed to be responsible for 99.7% of cervical cancers worldwide. Of these, one of the deadliest is HPV-16, which lingers in the body for years, quietly corrupting the cells it infects.

But there is a clear divide globally concerning where certain variants of this virus are found. Across the majority of the planet, one tends to run across type A, while in sub-Saharan Africa, most people are infected with types B and C. Intriguingly, the pattern exactly matches the distribution of Neanderthal DNA worldwide. The people of sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, not only carry unusual strains of HPV, but also carry very little of the Neanderthal haplotype in their genome. Infection patterns of HPV may seem irrelevant to our coronavirus discussion, but this not so. There is a pretty straightforward corollary, as the infection patterns and susceptibility to HPV can be related to CoViD-19 infection patterns among certain haplotypes.

Pimenoff used the genetic diversity found in type A today to determine that it must have emerged roughly 60,000 to 120,000 years ago. This makes it much younger than the other kinds of HPV-16. Quite significantly, this just happens to be around the time that early modern humans emerged from Africa, and came into contact with Neanderthals. Although it is hard to prove definitively, Pimenoff believes the two hominid species immediately began swapping sexually transmitted diseases, and the split in the variants of HPV-16 reflects the fact that we acquired type A from their antecedents.

“I tested it thousands of times using computational techniques, and the result was always the same—that this is the most plausible scenario,” says Pimenoff. Based on HPV infection patterns found today, he suspects that the virus wasn’t just transferred once to the human population, but multiple times. “It is very unlikely that it just happened once, because then it would be more probable that transmission would not survive further,” says Pimenoff. “These sexual encounters must have been rather typical in Eurasia, in areas where both human populations were present.”

Intriguingly, Pimenoff also believes the acquisition of type A from Neanderthals explains why it is so cancerous in humans, since we became infected more recently than Neanderthals and our immune systems have not yet developed the adaptation feature needed to expurgate it.

When one considered the effect of disease transfer between populations, the separations of the castes in India—a practice introduced by Aryan invaders—may have occurred in response to the sudden appearance of diseases never before seen in their population, causing them to deduce that STDs and other diseases had occurred because some of their ranks had bred with the Dravidian native population. This may have caused the Aryans to infer from this that the Dravidians were inferior and had tainted their genetics through crossbreeding, causing them to fall ill, which they may have seen as a curse or even judgment of their god. This may have led them to institute the caste system in order to genetically segregate their population from others considered inferior and even accursed.

Image is Available in PDF Format

Neanderthals (right) had projecting faces, low foreheads with pronounced browridges, wide cheekbones and weak chins compared to Homo sapiens (Credit: Sabena Jane Blackbird/Alamy)

In fact, sex with Neanderthals might have left Homo sapiens with an unwanted inheritance consisting of STDs, including an ancient relative of HIV. However, it seems we gave back as good as we got, as there is evidence that our Neanderthal cousins also inherited some STDs from us, including herpes.

Sexual Organs

Though it might seem crass to wonder what Neanderthal penises and vaginas were like, the fact is that an animal’s sexual organs can reveal a surprising amount about its lifestyles, mating practices, and even its evolutionary history. In fact, scientists recently discovered that the genetic code for penile spines—a remnant from our chimpanzee ancestors—is lacking in Neanderthal and Denisovan genomes, just as it is in modern humans, suggesting that it vanished from our ancestral hominid past at least 800,000 years ago. This is significant, as penis spines are thought to be beneficial in promiscuous species, where they may help males compete and maximize their reproduction odds. This has led to speculation that Neanderthals and Denisovans were monogamous by nature, just as humans generally promote monogamy as a virtue across cultures.

The Last Neanderthal: End of the Line

Crossbreeding with Neanderthals has likely contributed to a range of traits found in modern humans, from skin tone, hair color, and height to our sleeping patterns, and even our immune systems. Learning about them is already leading to potential treatments for modern diseases, such as drugs that target a Neanderthal gene thought to contribute to severe cases of CoViD-19.

The extinction of Neanderthals is thought to have occurred about 40,000 years ago. And there is some conjecture that STDs may have played a part. In fact, one theory promotes the view that diseases carried by the two subspecies—such as HPV and herpes—initially formed an invisible barrier, preventing either from expanding their territory and potentially coming into contact with one another. In the few areas where they did overlap, they interbred, granting early modern humans useful immunity genes, which suddenly made it possible for them to engage in territorial expansion.

Neanderthals, on the other hand, had no such luck, since, if they were saddled with a higher burden of disease to begin with, they may have remained vulnerable to these exotic new strains for a longer period, leaving them stuck, not only geographically, but in a biological bottleneck evolution-wise. Eventually, the ancestors of present-day humans invaded their territories and exterminated them.

Another theory holds that we gradually assimilated their relatively small population into that of early modern humans. After all, they had already largely adopted our Y chromosomes and mitochondria, and at least 20% of their DNA can still be found in modern humans.xii

Further studies on the genetic component of CoViD-19 susceptibility has revealed that five genes in particular exacerbate the likelihood of a CoViD-19 patient being admitted to the ICU and dying. A recent study conducted by the University of Edinburgh gathered DNA from 2,700 CoViD-19 patients in 208 ICUs across the UK. These were some of the most severe cases of CoViD-19 infection, as 22 percent of patients studied died, with 74 percent requiring ventilators, finding themselves unable to breathe on their own. The genetic information of these patients was compared to 100,000 anonymous Britons, revealing five common genes among extremely severe cases.

Knowing which genes are involved in severe cases of CoViD-19 infection can help scientists identify pre-existing drugs that could help treat CoViD-19. In addition, knowing which genes are involved in severe CoViD-19 cases could help identify which pre-existing drugs could be reassigned to fight the disease.

Revealed: The Five Genes

Creates an enzyme that can lead to inflammation. It is targeted with JAK inhibitors, which is facilitated by a drug already approved for use in humans called baricitinib, which was originally developed to treat rheumatoid arthritis.


It can be targeted by drugs that are undergoing trials, but have been used for psoriasis in the past. Evidence for this gene is not as strong as that found in other genes from the study, but researchers hold out some hope for the possibility.


This is a gene that initiates a signal that activates an enzyme which degrades RNA derived from viruses. Several other coronaviruses have a way of impeding the function of this mechanism. There is no tangible evidence yet that this is the case for SARS-CoV-2, but it might constitute a specific feature capable of doing this. It is targeted by a class of drugs called phosphodiesterase 12 inhibitors. While they are not currently being tested in clinical trials, they theoretically could enhance the antiviral effects of this mechanism.


This is a core part of signalling that initiates the host antiviral response. Signalling in this pathway is linked to the cause of sickness, which could help fight the virus directly, much like OAS1. It is important to facilitate this early in onset of the disease, as in later stages, virus levels drop, and the problem to be addressed is autoimmune dysfunction.


While DPP9 is known to contribute variously to inflammation, researchers do not yet know exactly where it fits in terms of CoViD-19 disease progression, finding they are unable to make a direct therapeutic prediction at this point. It is associated with pulmonary fibrosis and might be associated with a phenomenon known as “long CoViD.”

1. The genes were identified across the genome, with two on chromosome 19 called TYK2 and DPP9 and one found on chromosome 21 called IFNAR2.

CCR2 is a gene found on chromosome four, while OAS1 is located on chromosome 12. The prevalence of these genes partly explains why some people become extremely sick with CoViD-19, while others remain virtually unaffected. The importance of this study is that it identifies specific genes that play a role in CoViD-19 susceptibility, exposing them as targets for potential treatments. All five of the genes fall into one of two groups: modulators of inflammation or antivirals, the latter impeding the virus’s ability to replicate in the body.

In severe cases of CoViD-19, the virus levels have often already dwindled, and most of the damage is caused by a malfunction in the body’s immune system, causing it to attack the lungs and trigger severe inflammation, which sounds ominously like an autoimmune disease response, leading to a cytokine storm.

The closest thing to a cure for this severe immune reaction is dexamethasone, a steroid which has been known to save approximately 35 percent of patients relying on ventilators for respiratory assistance. One of the inflammatory genes is TYK2, which was identified by researchers as being a prime candidate for future clinical trials.

As part of the study, researchers performed Mendelian randomization, which allowed them to simulate a clinical trial. The researchers used this to compare people with differing levels of TYK2 expression, finding that people who produced more TYK2 are more at risk of CoViD-19 infection.

It has been discovered that, if production of the enzyme produced by TYK2 should happen to go awry, it can lead to excessive inflammation following CoViD-19 infection, which can often be fatal. The discovery of TYK2’s involvement in CoViD-19 is key, as there is a pre-existing drug called baricitinib that targets it. Known as a JAK inhibitor, baricitinib has already been approved for fighting rheumatoid arthritis. Researchers think JAK inhibitors could be of benefit to CoViD-19 patients by reducing the threat of lung inflammation.xiii

Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis is a genome sequencing center undertaking a study to sequence the DNA of young, healthy adults, and children who develop severe CoViD-19. The researchers are looking for genetic defects that could put certain individuals at greater risk from CoViD-19. Researchers also intend to study people who seem immune to CoViD-19, despite repeated exposure. Such people may have genetic variations that act as an immune firewall for the virus. For example, certain rare genetic variants are known to prevent some types of viral infections, including HIV and the norovirus. Knowledge gained from understanding CoViD-19’s challenges, including its pathogenicity and resistance capability, could lead to new therapies for combatting the illness.

“The first focus of our study will be patients with severe responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection—severe enough to require intensive care—who appear otherwise healthy and are younger than 50,” said Dr. Cooper, head of the clinical immunology program at St. Louis Children’s Hospital.

“These patients don’t have uncontrolled diabetes, heart disease, chronic lung disease or any other condition that we know increases the risk of severe complications from CoViD-19,” she said. “For example, we sometimes see stories about, say, a marathon runner or a generally fit, healthy person who nevertheless got very sick from this virus, or the few healthy children who are getting very sick with CoViD-19. These are the kinds of patients we’re interested in for this study. A small proportion of hospitalized patients will fit this category, likely less than 10%.”

Cooper studies primary immunodeficiencies in children, comprising some 450 genetic disorders of the immune system, often caused by gene mutations that have an impact on different aspects of immunity.

“With this pandemic, we can use our skills in gene hunting to search for genes that might be associated with severe CoViD-19 in children and younger adults,” she said. “We can foresee a future ability to do a genetic sequencing test for individual patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 and get an idea of whether they are likely to need more intensive care. In the meantime, we will be able to learn a great deal about how the immune system responds to this virus and what it needs to be able to respond effectively and in an appropriate manner.”

The study of CoViD patients’ genetics could reveal the important immune mechanisms used by the body to fight the virus. This could lead to the development of therapies that could help other patients with no genetic susceptibility to the virus, but who may have high-risk conditions, such as diabetes or heart disease.

“Our immune systems have never seen this virus before,” Cooper said. “We’re seeing severe CoViD-19 complications play out across the world right now. It is going to take a global effort to investigate the genetic factors and the immune system factors that really control this infection.”xiv

How Some Show No Symptoms While Others Become Deathly Ill

A study in Nature of more than 2,200 intensive care patients has identified specific genes that may hold the answer to how some show no symptoms while others become deathly ill. The presence of these genes appears to make some people more susceptible to severe CoViD-19 symptoms. The discovery sheds light on inherent weaknesses in the immune system, which could lead to new treatments.

These will continue to be needed even though vaccines are being developed, says Dr. Kenneth Baillie, a consultant in medicine at the Royal Infirmary in Edinburgh, who led the Genomic project. “Vaccines should drastically decrease the numbers of CoViD cases, but it’s likely doctors will still be treating the disease in intensive care for a number of years around the world, so there is an urgent need to find new treatments.”


Angry Cells

Scientists examined the DNA of patients in more than 200 ICUs in UK hospitals. They scanned each patient’s genes, which contain instructions for every biological process, including how to fight deadly antigen such as viruses. Their genomes were then compared with the DNA of healthy people to see what genetic differences could be identified. The scientists managed to pinpoint a number of genetic dichotomies, the most prominent of which was a gene called TYK2. “It is part of the system that makes your immune cells more angry, and more inflammatory,” explained Dr. Baillie.

It was soon discovered that, due to this faulty gene, it was possible for the immune response to spawn an autoimmune dysfunction, which could put some patients at risk of damaging lung inflammation. A class of anti-inflammatory drugs already used for conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis targets this biological mechanism, including a drug called baricitinib. “It makes it a very plausible candidate for a new treatment,” Dr. Baillie said. “But of course, we need to do large-scale clinical trials in order to find out if that’s true or not.”


Too Little Interferon

Other genetic differences were pinpointed, including one found in a gene called DPP9, known to play a role in inflammation, and also in a gene called OAS, which helps stop the virus from making copies of itself. Variations were also discovered in a gene called IFNAR2 in patients in the ICUs.

IFNAR2 is linked to a potent anti-viral molecule called interferon, which helps the immune system mobilize as soon as an infection is detected. It is believed that weak interferon production could give the virus a head start, allowing it to quickly replicate, leading to more severe disease.

Two other studies published in the journal Science have implicated interferon in CoViD-19 cases, as a result of both genetic mutations and an autoimmune disorder that affects its production. Professor Jean-Laurent Casanova, who carried out the research, from The Rockefeller University in New York, said: “[Interferon] accounted for nearly 15% of the critical CoViD-19 cases internationally enrolled in our cohort.”

Interferon can be given as a treatment, but a clinical trial conducted by WHO concluded that it was of little benefit to chronically sick patients. However, Professor Casanova indicated that the timing was important: “I hope that if given in the first two, three, four days of infection, the interferon would work, because it essentially would provide the molecule that the [patient] does not produce by himself or by herself.”


Dr. Vanessa Sancho-Shimizu, a geneticist from Imperial College London, said these genetic discoveries were significant in terms of understanding the biology of the disease. “It really is an example of precision medicine, where we can actually identify the moment at which things have gone awry in that individual,” she said. “The findings from these genetic studies will help us identify particular molecular pathways that could be targets for therapeutic intervention.”

The researchers identified a cluster of genes on chromosome 3 strongly linked to severe symptoms. However, the precise biological explanation for this is not yet known. More patients are being encouraged to participate in this study. “We need everyone,” said Dr. Baillie, “but we’re particularly keen to recruit people from minority ethnic groups who are over-represented in the critically ill population. There’s still a very urgent need to find new treatments for this disease and we have to make the right choices about which treatments to try next, because we don’t have time to make mistakes.”xv

What is not being discussed by these researchers, because of political correctness interfering with objective science is the reason there is an overrepresentation of ethnic minorities experiencing immune response complications resulting from CoViD-19 infection. The answer can be found in their genomes, but is not being discussed. The problem is related to the gene TYK2, which makes immune cells angrier, resulting in inflammation. This occurs in patients that have a higher ratio of Neanderthal and Denisovan genetics. This suggests that the virus is chewing at the low end of the evolutionary tree. Since Europeans have developed mechanisms to prevent this, probably as a result of the European population being survivors of the Bubonic Plague that wiped out two-thirds of the inhabitants of the continent, allowing them to develop an immune component resistant to plague relatives like coronaviruses. The fact is that due to the spike proteins associated with SARS-CoV-2, the virus tends to imbed itself in healthy cell tissue, arterial walls, heart, lung, and other vital organs, so that when antibodies mobilize an attack against the invading antigen, they damage the vital organs, artery walls, and healthy tissue in the process. This is a direct result of the TYK2 gene complication, which is more prevalent in patients with a higher Neanderthal and Denisovan gene expression. As politically incorrect as it may be, this gene expression has been found to be more prevalent in so-called ethnic minority groups found in Western developed countries, i.e. South Asians with a 60% Neanderthal gene component, Far East Asians with a strong Denisovan genetic component, some pockets of African populations who have inherited Neanderthal genetics from waves of migrations originating in the Altai Mountains. Where the problem is particularly pronounced is Brazil, where the native population, with a high Denisovan gene expression, have bred with those of African descent, and influxes of other populations with a high Neanderthal gene expression. This has quadrupled the TYK2 gene expression problem, resulting in autoimmune disease dysfunction.

Obesity Doubles the Risk of CoViD-19 Infection and Mortality

If the problems already identified weren’t enough, U.S. researchers have found that obesity makes people more prone to other diseases such as diabetes and high blood pressure, which in turn weakens their immune system. Due to their compromised immune system, such people become more susceptible to severe CoViD-19.

Researchers also believe that vaccines would prove less effective in protecting obese patients from CoViD-19 also because of the problem of weak immunity, as flu vaccines have been found to be less effective in those with a body mass index (BMI) of over 30.

The team from the University of North Carolina reviewed a total of 75 studies from around the world, including nearly 400,000 patients, and found that CoViD-19 patients suffering from obesity were twice as likely to be hospitalized and 74% more likely to be admitted to ICU. They were also found to be more at risk of dying from CoViD-19 infection.

Professor Barry Popkin, who led the study, said the increased risks of being obese and having CoViD-19 were “much higher than expected.” Obesity has been linked to a number of diseases that make people more susceptible to a severe reaction to CoViD-19 infection. It was found that obesity heightens the danger of bodily inflammation, reduced immune response, and increased stress for vital organs, including those involved with respiration.

“Vaccine researchers should look at how it affects obese individuals,” Professor Popkin says of a CoViD-19 vaccine. He is concerned that vaccines could prove deadly in populations with a high percentage of obese people. With 20% of the population overweight or obese in most countries–nearly 60% in the UK and U.S.–understanding how the obese might react to treatments and vaccines is “critical”.xvi

To substantiate the argument, the majority of CoViD-19 deaths internationally have occurred in countries with a ratio of obesity, with coronavirus fatality rates 10 times higher in nations where at least 50% of adults are overweight, according to a global study.

The report established a dramatic correlation between CoViD-19 death and obesity rates in countries around the world, finding that 90% or 2.2 million of the 2.5 million CoViD-19 deaths were in countries with high obesity rates. The study was based on CoViD-19 death figures compiled by Johns Hopkins University in the U.S. and the WHO’s Global Health Observatory data on obesity. “Look at countries like Japan and South Korea, where they have very low levels of CoViD-19 deaths as well as very low levels of adult obesity,” said Tim Lobstein, an expert advisor to the World Obesity Federation, who co-led the report. “They have prioritised public health across a range of measures, including population weight, and it has paid off in the pandemic.”

By contrast, the report found that in the U.S. and UK, there was a clear correlation between high CoViD-19 death rates and obesity levels. The UK has the world’s third-highest CoViD-19 death rate and the fourth-highest obesity rate—184 CoViD-19 deaths per 100,000 in a population with 63.7% of adults overweight, according to WHO data—followed by the U.S., with 152.49 CoViD-19 deaths per 100,000 in a population top heavy with 67.9% obese adults.

John Wilding, a professor of medicine at Britain’s University of Liverpool and president of the World Obesity Federation, sees obesity as a key factor in CoViD-19 health risk and believes it should be given serious consideration in the development and deployment of vaccines.

“It’s really important that we recognise that obesity…increases the risk,” he said in a statement about the report’s findings. “Therefore, like other diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, people with obesity should be considered for early priority in vaccination programmes across the world.”xvii

This is actually a dangerously misguided statement for John Wilding to make, since the CoViD-19 vaccine could prove deadly if given to the obese, particularly the mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, precisely because these vaccines program messenger RNA to produce the same spike proteins found in the virus itself, ostensibly so as to mobilize the immune system to attack the SARS-CoV-2 virus if it ever shows up. However, it has been found that the vaccine is likely to induce the same autoimmune disease dysfunction that the virus itself causes due to the fact that spike proteins tend to imbed themselves in blood vessel walls, as well as heart and lung tissue, prompting antibodies to attack these very sites.

It has been noted that as far as the first year of the pandemic is concerned, CoViD-19 hit some parts of the world harder than others. As of Oct 22, 2020, it was found that the top 23 countries ranked by death rate per 100,000 population were either in the Americas or Europe. The mortality rate can be strikingly different depending on the country. For example, Taiwan and Vietnam have had only 0.03 and 0.04 deaths per 100,000 respectively, whereas the 23 top countries all have a death rate greater than 38 per 100,000—a factor of 1000 or three orders of magnitude greater.

One factor that has been overlooked in CoViD-19 mortality statistics is the impact of chronic glyphosate exposure. Glyphosate is the active ingredient in the widely used herbicide Roundup, formerly used by Monsanto, but still in use by other agro-giant entities. Commonly used to control weeds in large industrialized farms, it is also used as a desiccant just before harvest. It has become clear that a number of comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity exacerbate the illness in CoViD-19 patients. In the U.S., these chronic diseases are rising in proportion with the increased use of glyphosate on core crops. Glyphosate has been identified as a key factor in making the CoViD-19 pandemic more chronic.

Most concerning is the possibility that glyphosate is released into the atmosphere as a by-product of the biofuel industry. The U.S., Brazil, Argentina, and most European countries have all played a leading role in developing technology aimed at turning food industry waste into useful fuel. Such fuel sources include plant stocks left behind after the harvest, manure, and by-products of the meat-processing industry, waste oil from restaurants, and wood scraps from the paper-manufacturing industry. All of these can contain glyphosate contaminants. Cities with a high usage of biodiesel, biofuel for heating oil, aviation biofuel, bioethanol, and/or biogas are likely to be badly impacted by CoViD-19, because glyphosate exposure through breathing disrupts immune function in the lungs, interfering with the patient’s ability to purge the virus.

Chemtrails are a related factor, as they contain barium, strontium, aluminum and other elements known to be immune suppressants. While there are claims that chemtrails are part of a geoengineering effort to reduce global warming by reflecting some solar radiation back into outer space, the secrecy and lack of disclosure about the true purpose of chemtrails suggest it is more probably part of a multipronged attack on the population as part of an effort to cull the herd. Unfortunately, we are being bombarded with chemical additives in our food and water, and air particulate elements in air pollution, that dramatically reduce our immune response when diseases like CoViD-19 show up.

There are many factors exacerbating the seriousness of the CoViD-19 pandemic. One often overlooked issue is the role of element deuterium, which is central to the disease process. Proper deuterium fractionation is crucial for metabolism to work properly in the cellular organelle known as the mitochondria. Water accumulating in the lungs—a common feature of CoViD-19—is an active attempt to restore mitochondrial health to the immune cells, which may be an expression of edema anywhere in the body it is demonstrated to occur.


Professor László Boros has done extensive research on the damaging effects that deuterium has on mitochondria. Deuterium is a heavy hydrogen isotope. Hydrogen is the smallest atom, with only one proton and one electron. Deuterium is atomically nearly the same, except that it has an extra neutron, making it almost twice as heavy as hydrogen, while granting it distinct physical and chemical properties. Deuterium is quite pervasive in nature, found at 155 parts per million in seawater for instance. Mitochondria are small organelles contained in large numbers in most eukaryotic cells, and they are responsible for producing adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the major energy source for cells. When cells create ATP, they also combine protons with oxygen to produce water.

Systemic mitochondrial deterioration is one of the major indicators of the aging process. Mitochondrial dysfunction, caused by glyphosates raising deuterium levels, has been linked to many neurological, metabolic, and oncological diseases, as aged mitochondria spew out more tissue-damaging waste products and produce ATP less efficiently. Mitochondria depend upon a “proton motive force” to produce ATP, which involves pumping huge quantities of protons across a membrane through the ATPase pump. As deuterons are larger and heavier than hydrogen atoms, they disrupt the smooth flow of protons and decrease the efficiency of the pump, disrupting the fuel line like putting sugar in a gas tank.

Glyphosate and Deuterium

A unique aspect of glyphosate’s cumulative toxic buildup is its ability to get inserted into proteins by mistake in place of the coding amino acid glycine. Glycine is the smallest amino acid. Glyphosate is a complete glycine molecule, except that it has an extra methylphosphonate unit attached to its nitrogen atom. The enzyme that glyphosate disrupts in organisms has a glycine residue. Species that have a mutated form of the enzyme—with alanine replacing this glycine residue—are completely immune to the effects of glyphosate. Without glycine, there is no chance to substitute and disrupt the protein. Sulfate supplies can also be depleted by glyphosate, which disrupts the organism’s ability to maintain adequate amounts of gelled water. Glyphosate is known to disrupt sulfate synthesis, transport, and transfer from one molecule to another.

Bradykinin Storm

One CoViD-19 study used computational techniques to analyze “gene expression data from cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from CoViD-19 patients that were used to sequence the virus.” Their technique allowed them to determine which proteins were overexpressed in the alveoli in the lungs of infected patients. They found that a protein called bradykinin was produced in large amounts in the infected lungs. Bradykinin is a powerful signaling molecule, producing a drop in blood pressure and inducing leakages in the blood vessels that allow both immune cells and fluid to escape from the blood and enter the interstitial spaces. In addition, they found overproduction of hyaluronic acid in the lung alveoli. Through osmosis, hyaluronic acid attracts and impedes the fluid escaping from the blood, inducing pulmonary edema, a characteristic feature of ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome). This explains why many CoViD-19 patients experience a sensation very similar to drowning. By trapping gelled water, the hyaluronic acid creates a negatively charged gel that releases protons into the interstitial spaces, in order to fuel the mitochondria of cells.

Viral Lipid Envelope and Lipoxygenase

Remarkably, it has been discovered that the SARS CoV-2 virus protein coat contains three pockets within its contour shape that perfectly fit a very common fatty acid called linoleic acid. It is surmised that the virus picks up multiple molecules of linoleic acid as it exits the human host cell, surrounding itself with a lipid envelope. Since the immune cells respond to the virus by inducing an inflammatory response, and an inflammatory response induces lipoxygenase, it is probable that the linoleic acid trapped in the membranes of the viruses will be metabolized by lipoxygenase to produce leukotrienes, while also further supplying DDW to the surrounding fluids. This sets up a perfect storm for macrophages (“big eaters”—immune cells that specialize in clearing viruses) to congregate at the site of the immune response to the virus. This can have the disastrous effect of causing auto-immune disease dysfunction, since the over-accumulation of such macrophages can spawn an attack in certain undesirable sites such as the heart muscle of lung tissue.

Mitochondrial Rejuvenation

It has only recently become known to researchers that cells have a remarkable ability to share mitochondria, and that this practice can lead to a healing process for sick immune cells. An acute reaction to SARS CoV-2 results in an intense inflammatory response that sets in motion a dramatic sequence of events, possibly with the ultimate goal of energizing the macrophages so that they can effectively clear the virus. Glyphosate appears to be a major culprit in obstructing this process. If the immune cells were healthy, they would easily clear the virus without overt symptoms of disease.

Besides mesenchymal stem cells, platelets are also a fantastic source of fresh mitochondria for the macrophages. Platelets are tiny cell fragments with no nucleus, each containing a handful of mitochondria. Under stressful conditions, so-called “activated” platelets release their mitochondria, either as isolated mitochondria or packaged up inside lipid particles called exosomes. The macrophages take up these mitochondria, most likely after they have been re-enforced with deuterium depleted water. In fact, one of the primary functions of platelets may be to serve as a reserve supply of healthy mitochondria for the immune cells.

It would seem that the virus has facilitated a remarkable repair mechanism, which empowers the macrophages to clear the virus, because they have now been endowed with an adequate supply of healthy mitochondria. This creates a very different viewpoint on the role viruses play in health and disease. The viruses appear to be collaborating with host cells in a symbiotic relationship that results in healing, unless too many toxic impediments should undermine this process. We should remember that mitochondria are thought to be viral stowaways that ended up taking up permanent residence within the cells of eukaryotic species. This explains why mitochondria produce their own RNA and DNA as organelles within the cell.

Drastic Final Measures

In some patients, the mitochondria in their macrophages may become impaired due to chronic glyphosate exposure. When this happens, a systemic response ensues, involving the entire circulatory system. What occurs is that production of an enzyme called heme oxygenase is massively increased in response to low oxygen levels, breaking down the heme found to be present in large amounts in the red blood cells, converting it to biliverdin. Biliverdin, in turn, gets converted to bilirubin, an effective antioxidant that can guard against oxidative damage caused by free radicals. But, for every molecule of biliverdin produced, there will be three molecules of deuterium depleted water. It has been shown that heme oxygenase is a welcome response to inflammation, which eventually tames the inflammation and resolves the disease. However, glyphosate can interfere with this process as well, resulting in a harmful positive feedback loop and a relentless chain reaction of inflammation. Ultimately, massive blood clots form throughout the capillaries and the patient dies from blood clotting or from multiple organ failure.


Research papers on the course of the CoViD-19 disease reveal a remarkable mechanism by which a serious mitochondrial disorder in the immune cells can actually be repaired by SARS CoV-2. At first, the patient experiences the uncomfortable sensation of drowning due to the accumulation of deuterium depleted water in the lungs. However, this water enables the macrophages to repair their mitochondria, empowering them to clear the virus, metabolizing the viral components into useful raw materials. Remarkably, it actually has the effect of strengthening the host’s immune system.

But this may not be enough for patients who have been more severely compromised by glyphosate and other environmental toxins. These patients tend to progress into a more severe stage where platelet involvement can result in serious blood clots in the vascular system, with potentially life-threatening consequences. It may be deduced, therefore, one may be able to protect oneself from CoViD-19 by consuming a 100% certified organic whole foods diet.xviii

Quite remarkably, scientists have discovered that some recovering CoViD-19 patients did not appear to have any antibodies against it. It was then discovered that, many of those who developed antibodies against the virus, seem to lose them again within a few months. In short, though antibodies have proved invaluable for tracking the spread of the pandemic, they might not play as active a role in immunity as scientists once thought. Long-term protection may depend on other variables than simple antibody immunity.

While virologists remain preoccupied with the role played by antibodies, researchers realize that another form of immunity may play a role, one that has been lurking undetected in the body for years. An enigmatic type of white blood cell is achieving greater notice. And though it has not previously featured heavily in the public consciousness, it may well prove to be crucial in our fight against CoViD-19. T-cells may steal the limelight soon given the change in focus that has made it assume center stage.

Blood Samples Show T-cells Detect Proteins on CoViD-19 Virus Surface

A T-cell is a kind of immune cell, whose main purpose is to identify and hunt down invading pathogens or infected cells and kill them. It does this using proteins on its surface, which can bind to proteins on the surface of viruses. Each T-cell is highly specific. There are trillions of possible versions of these surface proteins, each capable of recognizing a different target. Because T-cells can linger in the blood for years after an infection, they also contribute to the immune system’s “long-term memory,” helping it mount a faster and more effective response whenever a slight variant of an old nemesis turns up.

Several studies have shown that people infected with CoViD-19 tend to have T-cells capable of targeting the virus irrespective of whether they have experienced symptoms. However, scientists have also discovered that some people can test negative for antibodies against CoViD-19 and positive for T-cells with the capability of identifying the virus. This has spurred the theory that some level of immunity against the disease are more common than previously thought.

Quite surprisingly, when researchers tested blood samples taken years before the pandemic started, they found T-cells specifically tailored to detect proteins on the surface of CoViD-19. This suggests that some people had already developed an immune mechanism resistant to the virus before it had even appeared. In fact, this phenomenon of pre-existing immunity appears to be surprisingly prevalent: 40-60% of unexposed individuals had these cells. It looks increasingly as if T-cells might afford a secret form of immunity to CoViD-19.

The central role of T-cells could also help to explain some of the anomalies that have so far defied explanation—from the dramatic escalation in risk older people face when confronted by the virus, to the shocking discovery that it can destroy the spleen. Deciphering the importance of T-cells is not just a matter of academic curiosity. If scientists know which aspects of the immune system are most important, they can direct their efforts to devising more effective medicinal remedies.

How Immunity Works

Most people probably have not considered the role played by T-cells or T-lymphocytes as they are also known, but to see just how crucial they are to our immune response, we only have to look to late-stage AIDS. While the persistent fevers, sores, fatigue, weight loss, rare cancers have begun to manifest, normally harmless microbes, such as the fungus Candida albicans—usually found on the skin—start to take over the body.

Over the course of months or years, HIV mobilizes a reconnaissance and subterfuge campaign against T-cells—factory cells that manufacture the body’s defenses—invading them and sabotaging them from within so that they commit suicide. “It wipes out a large fraction of them,” says Adrian Hayday, an immunology professor at King’s College London and group leader at the Francis Crick Institute. “And so that really emphasises how incredibly important these cells are—and that antibodies alone are not going to get you through.”

During a normal immune response, the first line of defence is the innate immune system, involving the leukocytes and chemical signals that raise the alarm. This engages the production of antibodies, which are triggered a few weeks later.

“And in parallel with that, starting out about four or five days after infection, you begin to see T cells getting activated, and indications they are specifically recognising cells infected with the virus,” says Hayday. These unlucky cells are then dispatched quickly and brutally—either directly by the T-cells themselves, or by other parts of the immune system they coopt to accomplish the task for them. All this occurs before the virus has a chance to turn them into factories that produce more copies of itself.

What Is Known about T-Cells and CoViD-19?

“Looking at CoViD-19 patients—but also I’m happy to say, looking at individuals who have been infected but did not need hospitalisation—it’s absolutely clear that there are T cell responses,” says Hayday. “And almost certainly this is very good news for those who are interested in vaccines, because clearly we’re capable of making antibodies and making T cells that see the virus.”

In fact, one vaccine developed by Oxford University in collaboration with AstraZeneca has already been shown to trigger the production of these cells in addition to antibodies. It is still too early to know how effectively this will boost the immune response, but its developers regard it as “extremely promising.”

There is a catch, however. In many patients who are hospitalized with more serious cases of CoViD-19, the T-cell response has been shown to be quite insipid. “Vast numbers of T-cells are being affected,” says Hayday. “And what is happening to them is a bit like a wedding party or a stag night gone wrong—I mean massive amounts of activity and proliferation, but the cells are also just disappearing from the blood.”

One theory is that these T-cells are just redirected to where they are needed most, such as the lungs, extirpated from certain areas of the body, like an extirpated species vacating its usual habitat. But his team suspects that a lot of them are dying instead, like a species experiencing an extinction die-off in the wild. “Autopsies of CoViD-19 patients are beginning to reveal what we call necrosis, which is a sort of rotting,” he says. Apparently, this is particularly evident in areas of the spleen and lymph glands which is the T-cells natural habitat within the body.

Quite disturbingly, spleen necrosis is a hallmark of T-cell disease, in which the immune cells themselves are attacked. “If you look in post-mortems of Aids patients, you see these same problems,” says Hayday. “But HIV is a virus that directly infects T-cells, it knocks on the door and it gets in.” In contrast, there is no evidence to date that the CoViD-19 virus is capable of the same feat.

“There are potentially many explanations for this, but to my knowledge, nobody has one yet,” says Hayday. “We have no idea what is happening. There’s every evidence that the T cells can protect you, probably for many years. But when people get ill, the rug seems to be being pulled from under them in their attempts to set up that protective defence mechanism.”

Dwindling T-cells might also provide an explanation for why the elderly are much more severely affected by CoViD-19 than younger populations. Hayday points to an experiment conducted in 2011, which involved exposing mice to a version of the SARS-CoV virus responsible for causing SARS. Previous research had shown that the virus, also a coronavirus and a close relative of CoViD-19, triggered the production of T-cells, which were responsible for clearing the infection.

The follow-up study produced similar results, but the twist was that this time the mice were allowed to grow old. As they did, their T-cell responses became significantly weaker. However, in the same experiment, scientists also exposed mice to a flu virus. In contrast with those infected with CoViD-19, the mice managed to maintain their T-cell defenses against influenza pretty much till the end of their life cycle.

“It’s an attractive observation, in the sense that it could explain why older individuals are more susceptible to CoViD-19,” says Hayday. “When you reach your 30s, you begin to really shrink your thymus [a gland located behind your sternum and between your lungs, which plays an important role in the development of immune cells] and your daily production of T-cells is massively diminished.”

What is the Effect on Long-Term Immunity?

“With the original [SARS] virus [which emerged in 2002], people went back to patients and definitely found evidence for T-cells some years after these individuals were infected,” says Hayday. “This is again consistent with the idea that these individuals carried protective T cells, long after they had recovered.”

The fact that coronaviruses can lead to lasting T-cell development is what recently inspired scientists to check old blood samples taken from people between 2015 and 2018 to see if they contained any T-cells capable of recognizing CoViD-19. When this was confirmed, it led to suggestions that their immune systems learnt to recognize it due to past encounters with cold viruses with similar surface proteins. This raises the tantalizing possibility that the reason some people experience more severe infections is that they are not endowed with T-cells capable of recognizing the virus. “I think it’s fair to say that the jury is still out,” Hayday maintains.

Unfortunately, no one has ever verified whether people manufacture T-cells against any of the coronaviruses that give rise to the common cold. “To get funding to study this would have required a pretty Herculean effort,” says Hayday. Research into the common cold went out of fashion in the 1980s, after the field stagnated and scientists began to migrate to other projects that seemed more important, like studying HIV. Making progress since then has proven difficult, because the illness can be caused by hundreds of different viral strains, many of them able to mutate quite quickly.

Will This Lead to a Vaccine?

If old exposures to cold viruses really do lead to milder cases of CoViD-19, this bodes well for the development of a vaccine, since it proves that lingering T-cells can provide significant protection, even years afterward. Hayday explains that the way vaccines are designed generally depends on the kind of immune response scientists are aiming for. Some might trigger the production of antibodies—free-floating proteins capable of binding to invading pathogens and either neutralizing them or tagging them so another part of the immune system can target them, similar to terrorists being tagged with a homing device so they can be targeted later. Others might aim to get T-cells involved, or perhaps provoke a response from other parts of the immune system.

“There really is an enormous spectrum of vaccine design,” says Hayday. He’s particularly encouraged by the fact that the virus is evidently highly visible to the immune system, even in those who are severely affected. “So if we can stop whatever it’s doing to the T-cells of the patients we’ve had the privilege to work with, then we will be a lot further along in controlling the disease.”

The role T-cells play in immunity is likely to get increasing attention in the future. What is clear from this most recent world pandemic is that it has redirected focus to the immune system itself, with the intention of finding ways to enhance its capability and defensive power.xix

Coronavirus Makes Changes That Cause Cells Not to Recognize It

A new study has revealed that CoViD-19 has the unique characteristic of being able to change the appearance of its messenger RNA cap to trick the host cell into not recognizing it as a foreign body. As with an alarm code that makes it possible to breach the security features of a building without setting off the alarm, SARS-CoV-2 has the same advantage when entering cells. It has the security code that grants it access.

Researchers at The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UT Health San Antonio) explain how CoViD-19 achieves this. The scientists resolved the structure of an enzyme called nsp16, which the virus produces and then uses to modify its messenger RNA cap, said Yogesh Gupta, Ph.D., the study’s lead author. “It’s a camouflage,” Dr. Gupta said. “Because of the modifications, which fool the cell, the resulting viral messenger RNA is now considered as part of the cell’s own code and not foreign.”

Deciphering the 3D structure of nsp16 opens the door for the design of antiviral drugs for CoViD-19 and other emerging coronavirus infections, Dr. Gupta said. The new small molecule (NSM) drugs would inhibit nsp16 from making the modifications. The immune system would then be able to pick the invading virus up on its radar, recognize it as foreign, and hunt it down.

“Yogesh’s work discovered the 3D structure of a key enzyme of the CoViD-19 virus required for its replication and found a pocket in it that can be targeted to inhibit that enzyme. This is a fundamental advance in our understanding of the virus,” said study coauthor Robert Hromas, MD, professor and dean of the Long School of Medicine.

In lay terms, messenger RNA can be described as a courier of genetic code to worksites that produce proteins. If this process can be inhibited and thwarted in the virus, it could undermine the most basic component in its weapon arsenal, the main cloaking device it employs to invade and attack the human host.xx

CoViD-19 is continuing to spread across the world with 75 million confirmed cases in 190 countries and an estimated two million deaths by the end of 2021. However, these stats need to be questioned, since a lot of hospitals have been encouraging relatives of the deceased to sign death certificates attributing death to CoViD-19, as the hospitals and sometimes the relatives of the deceased receive financial incentives to do so. When you think about families who have been out of work for months due to the lockdown, a financial incentive of $2,000 or $3,000 could be a strong temptation when incurring funeral costs and other expenses. This is not a rare occurrence, but a quite common one around the world. The author of this article has directly come across two cases of patients dying from other causes having their surviving family encouraged to sign death certificates attributing the cause of death to CoViD-19. One case involved family of the author in the Philippines. Following the death of an aunt from lung cancer, the hospital authorities encouraged the family to verify CoViD-19 as the cause of death as they would receive a 37,000 pesos financial incentive for doing so. Being cash-strapped from the lockdown and faced with having to cover funeral expenses, the family felt they had no choice. It is not by coincidence that such financial incentives have been put in place or that people have been placed in such financial constraints that they are tempted to accept what amounts to a bribe. Folks, this is part of the conspiracy. The fact that people have now stopped using the phrase conspiracy theory so liberally points to the fact that we are all in the midst of the greatest conspiracy ever hatched on this planet, one that is directly affecting all of us.

Image is Available in PDF Format

Note: The recent jump and fall in the 56-day trend for global cases was caused by Turkey

Source: Johns Hopkins University, national public health agencies and UN population data

Figures last updated: December 21, 2020, 08:19 GMT

We have been led to believe that coronavirus cases have surged over the past few months in several regions of the world and a spike in new infections has been seen in many countries in early 2021. It is hard to know what to believe, when the PCR test cycles have been deliberately increased to create false positives. How many people have been intubated that were only suffering from the seasonal flu and succumbed as the result of inappropriate treatment? It is worth asking the question because the level of fraud committed during this worldwide criminal operation is unprecedented in the history of the world. It is shocking that lack of integrity and virtuosity could have brought us to this. Who could have ever believed that politicians and medical professionals could have sold us out so easily over petty financial incentives that in many cases don’t even benefit them directly and cause them to commit treason and even mass murder against their own citizens? It is shocking to see how the Nuremburg Code’s strictures against medical experimentation on civilian populations without their informed consent have been so easily flouted and how easily we have forgotten the lessons of history.

Image is Available in PDF Format

The WHO has warned that the CoViD-19 vaccines granted approval for public use are no magic bullet for the coronavirus and present no guarantee that the pandemic will end any time soon. “Vaccines do not equal zero CoViD,” said WHO emergencies director Michael Ryan. “Vaccination will add a major, major, powerful tool to the tool kit that we have. But by themselves, they will not do the job.” Such an admission begs the question of why, when there is no evidence of any benefit to be derived from CoViD vaccination that such a dangerous form of treatment would be recommended in the first place. And given that the military-pharmaceutical complex is responsible for developing the weaponized coronavirus through gain-of-function laboratory experimentation, and that the same entity is behind the vaccines, it should be clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that we have been boxed in by a problem-reaction-solution dialectic, in which the so-called solution is likely to kill us as effectively as the problem. The only answer to this global military assault on the world’s citizenry is total non-compliance with this criminal totalitarian world and local government tyranny.

Several countries have approved CoViD-19 vaccines for use on the civilian population. The fact that vaccines have been promoted to the exclusion of all else as an antidote to CoViD-19, while alternatives are being suppressed is shocking and quite infuriating to say the least. One would have thought that citizens living in so-called democracies in Western developed countries would be granted some level of choice when it comes to deciding on personal health options. However, such choices are not being granted, and our freedoms have been stripped away to the point where we have been cajoled into a “new normal” that is far from normal, ethical, or acceptable. We have been told that it is for our own good, and that the greater good—the health and well-being of society as a whole—is the summum bonum. Meanwhile, we have all collectively lost our rights, freedom, and sovereignty, and are unlikely to ever get them back once we have naively relinquished them.

U.S. Has Most Purported Cases and Deaths

The U.S. had purportedly recorded nearly 20 million cases and more than 300,000 deaths from CoViD-19 by the end of 2020, the highest figures in the world supposedly. But are these stats reliable? With hospitals receiving financial perks for CoViD-19 patients, many are choosing to list their patients as CoViD-19 casualties, when they are nothing of the kind. Yet, we are told that daily cases have been at record levels since early November 2020, and 100,000 people are purported to have been hospitalized with CoViD-19, more than in either of the two previous waves, if the stats can even be relied upon, which is highly questionable, given the financial incentive hospitals receive for listing patients as victims of CoViD-19. In addition, there are inaccuracies in the count caused by flaws in the PCR Test Kits, which Dr. Yeaden, a scientist long associated with Pfizer, alleges is inflating CoViD-19 positive results by ten times.

There is another reason to be skeptical about the U.S. CoViD-19 statistics, which is the political factor. The World Economic Forum has made it abundantly clear through its own literature that it is opposed to the neo-liberal economic model exemplified by the UK and U.S. It therefore has a vested interest in setting both countries up for “failed nation” status due to alleged poor CoViD-19 response measures, while sabotaging the two countries’ economies through lockdown and shelter-in-place measures, while heaping praise on communist China for launching such an effective response. The leftist bias in the Western media has become so obvious that it should be clear to anyone with any powers of perception that this plandemic is a world communist coup orchestrated by the UN world government and its affiliate agencies. Even the stats are biased, while most of the so-called ‘science’ has been reduced to pseudo-science to compliment the mainstream CoViD-19 narrative promoted by mainstream media and academia.

Image is Available in PDF Format

The outbreak has had a devastating impact on the world economy, but the U.S. economy has been hit particularly hard. Nearly eight million Americans, many of them children and minorities, have fallen into poverty since May of 2020. However, it is clear from the book COVID-19: The Great Reset by World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab and colleague, Theiss Milleret, that the U.S. and UK are singled out as economies that embrace neo-liberalism, which the authors see as a fault. Their observation is that the countries that mobilized the most effective response to the CoViD-19 pandemic were countries that were more command and control in economic orientation and had relatively homogenous populations that could be rallied in solidarity and common cause rather easily to respond to the ‘pandemic’ emergency. It is clear what the two co-authors favor and the kind of future society their colleagues at WEF support.

Meanwhile, it has been reported that daily cases had fallen in many European countries during November 2020 after some steep rises in October. But in December, cases had allegedly begun to surge again in several countries, including France, Germany, and the UK, so it has been reported. However, what has not been taken into account is that more testing is being conducted than before, which is naturally going to increase the stats. Even more worrying is the fact that many of the PCR tests are known for their inaccuracy and are generating many false positives. The bang on effect of this is that lockdowns are becoming more draconian in nature, and civil liberties are being stripped away by governments and health authorities that are unlikely to ever give them back. Lockdowns and other restrictions have been reintroduced in some of the worst-affected regions ostensibly to help bring down the numbers. And many countries have placed temporary bans on arrivals from the UK, because of concerns about the spread of what has been dubbed “a new variant” of the coronavirus, which may have led to a rise in cases in some parts of the country. The overall effect of all this is that our countries are being economically sabotaged, quite by design, in a strategy game consisting of “disaster economics,” so that the globalists can usher in the Great Reset, which will usher in a worldwide digital currency to replace the wilfully and deliberately bankrupted national currencies it has been designed to replace.

Image is Available in PDF Format

What Other Places Have Seen an Infection Spike?

Asia was the center of the initial outbreak, but the number of cases there was relatively low until it saw a surge in infections over the summer of 2020, which had recorded 10 million confirmed cases at the time, the second-highest official total in the world after the U.S. The daily number then tailed off come September 2020, but has since shot up dramatically in the early months of 2021. This is probably attributable to the Neanderthal genetic fostering the gene defect TYK2, which results in immunity complications.

In Latin America, Brazil has more than 7 million confirmed cases and the world’s second highest death toll. In all likelihood, Brazil is particularly hard hit due to the combination of Denisovan genetics among the native population and the Neanderthal haplotype in those of African ancestry, magnifying the TYK2 gene defect multifold in the mixed Brazilian population. The country was purportedly experiencing a second wave of infections at the end of 2020. Argentina, Colombia, and Mexico have also recorded more than 1 million cases and all three countries were still producing high numbers of daily confirmed cases in early 2021.

Image is Available in PDF Format

Africa has recorded about 2.5 million cases, but the true extent of the pandemic on that continent is unknown as testing rates are low. South Africa, with more than 900,000 cases and 24,000 deaths, was the worst affected country on the continent by the end of 2020. Genetics would be an obvious factor, since South Africa is particularly multicultural with a substantial population of so-called ‘colored’ people, many of whom are of Indian origin. Morocco, Egypt, Ethiopia, and Tunisia are the only other African countries to officially record more than 100,000 cases.


What about the Economic Toll?

Governments around the world have chosen to limit public movement and close businesses and venues in a bid to slow the virus’s spread. This has had a devastating impact on the global economy. Damage to the world’s major economies is four times worse than the 2009 global financial crisis, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Meanwhile, the UN has said that up to 265 million people could face starvation by the end of the year because of the impact of the CoViD-19 lockdown. The UN also admits that the ‘pandemic’ could also wipe out 25 years of improvements in gender equality. The UN and its affiliate totalitarian world government bodies can congratulate themselves for these achievements, since they are wholly and entirely to blame for this human tragedy.

Given the UN projection on the harm caused by pandemic lockdowns, one wonders at the wisdom of a worldwide response protocol that is actually increasing rather than decreasing the deathrate. Given that at least 265 million people are projected to be suffering from starvation, it is clear that the lockdown will be responsible for more suffering and death than the virus itself. From that perspective, it seems clear that the UK government might have been right all along when it adopted a policy of allowing herd immunity through a laisser-faire approach to virus spread.xxi

Gauging the true extent of the threat the virus posed was made quite impossible from the outset. The media and politicians spread a distorted and misleading picture based on fundamental flaws in data collection, mainly as a result of medically incorrect definitions promoted by WHO, the CDC and other health agencies. Each positive laboratory test for the virus was to be reported as a CoViD-19 case, when very often the PCR test was picking up the presence of viral material from previous infections. This definition broke a fundamental first rule of infectiology: the necessity to differentiate between “infection” (invasion and multiplication of an agent in the host) and “infectious disease” (infection with ensuing illness). CoViD-19 is the designation for severe illness that occurs only in about 10% of infected individuals, but because of incorrect designation, the number of so-called ‘cases’ surged.

Another serious mistake was that every deceased person who had tested positive for the virus was recorded in the official records as a coronavirus victim, a method that violated all international medical guidelines. The absurdity of giving CoViD-19 as the cause of death for a terminal cancer patient is an unforgivable fraud that was repeatedly perpetrated on the public during the ‘pandemic’. Correlation does not imply causation, yet this causal fallacy was permitted to drive the world toward catastrophe. The truth pertaining to the virus remained shrouded in rumor, myth, and mistaken belief. A French study, published March 19, 2020, was the first to shed light on the problem. Two cohorts of approximately 8,000 patients with respiratory disease were grouped according to whether they were carrying ordinary everyday coronaviruses like the common cold or SARS-CoV-2. Deaths in each group were registered over two months. However, the number of fatalities did not significantly differ in the two groups and the conclusion followed that the dangers associated with CoViD-19 were probably way overblown. In a subsequent study, the same team compared the mortality rates associated with diagnosis of respiratory viruses during the colder months of 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 in southeastern France. Overall, the proportion of respiratory virus-related deaths among hospitalized patients was not significantly higher for 2019–2020 than the year before. Therefore, the addition of SARS-CoV-2 to the spectrum of viral pathogens did not affect overall mortality rates in patients suffering from respiratory disease.xxii How can any of this be reconciled with the official reports of the horrifying number of CoViD-19 deaths? Two numbers must be known if the danger of viral transmission is to be assessed: the number of infections and the number of deaths.xxiii

Furthermore, it has been determined that the virus is present in the nasopharynx for approximately two weeks, at which point it is possible to detect it. By what means? Viral RNA is transcribed into DNA and quantified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The first assay for the new coronavirus was developed under the guidance of Professor Christian Drosten, Head of the Institute for Virology at the Charité Berlin. This test was used across the world in the first few months of the outbreak. Tests from other laboratories would follow later.xxiv

Diagnostic PCR tests are normally subject to stringent quality assessment and are approved by regulatory agencies before being used. This is important because no laboratory test has ever been found to be 100% correct. Quality control measures were essentially dispensed with in the case of SARS-CoV-2 because an international emergency had been declared. Consequently, nothing was really known about PCR test reliability. In essence, these parameters should give an indication of how many false-positive or false-negative results should be expected. The test protocol from the Drosten laboratory was used worldwide. As it happened, test results played a decisive role in defining political decision-making during the crisis. Yet, data interpretation was often largely a matter of interpretation and belief. What did Drosten himself say on Twitter?

Sure: Towards the end of the illness the PCR is sometimes positive and sometimes negative. Here, chance plays a role. When you test a patient twice as negative and discharge him as cured, it is indeed possible that you can have positive test results again at home. But this is still far from being a re-infection.

Several physician colleagues have informed us of similar haphazard results with patients who had been tested repeatedly during their hospitalization. Is it particularly surprising that goats and papayas tested positive for the virus in Tanzania? The criticism by the President of Tanzania regarding the unreliability of the test kits was of course immediately dismissed by WHO. But today it is perfectly clear that the test result is error-prone, as is every PCR. How much so, and whether there are significant differences among the presently available tests, cannot be determined because of lack of data.

Instead, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the German federal government agency and research institute for disease control, stipulated at the beginning that only selective testing should be carried out—exactly the opposite of what should have happened. And as the epidemic ran its course, the RKI stepwise altered the testing strategy—always diametrically in the wrong direction.

At first, only people who had been in high-risk areas or had been in contact with an infected person and also presented with flu-like symptoms were to be tested. At the end of March 2020, the RKI then changed the recommended test criteria to: flu-like symptoms in addition to contact with an infected person. At the beginning of May 2020, the President of the RKI, Professor Lothar Wieler, announced people with even “the slightest symptoms” should be tested.

The responsibility for translating these dubious decisions into action lay entirely within the hands of the local health authorities. An employee at a lab facility was a typical example: the coach of her handball team was coronavirus positive. The players were sent home on a 14-day quarantine order. One player developed symptoms with coughing and hoarseness and wanted to get tested, but was refused on the grounds that she had no fever. A player from a neighboring district had no symptoms but the local health authority ordered a test nevertheless.

This resulted in chaos due to the appalling ineptitude of the authorities from top to bottom. What would have been urgently needed instead were scientifically sound studies to clarify basic issues of virus dissemination. As many as possible should have been tested in outbreak areas. Antibody responses in those that had tested positive could have subsequently been assessed. Only a single such study addressing these questions was undertaken in Germany: the Heinsberg investigation conducted by Professor Hendrik Streeck, Director of the Institute for Virology at the University of Bonn. Aware of the importance of the preliminary data, these were presented at a press conference, where Streeck was ridiculed by the disbelieving media. The fatality rate was dismissed as impossible, as it was ten times lower than what acknowledged experts and WHO had been claiming as established facts. After completion of the study, final results essentially confirming the preliminary report were again presented, and again deemed by the media to be flawed and inconclusive. But the results of the study spoke for themselves and completely contradicted the overhyped propaganda of the media.xxv

How Many Deaths Did SARS-CoV-2 Infections Claim?

Determining how many deaths have resulted from the disease again comes down to the problem of definition: what is a “coronavirus death”? If an individual drives to the hospital to be tested and later suffers a fatal car accident—just as his positive test results are returned—he nevertheless becomes a coronavirus death statistic. If another individual tests positive for CoViD-19 and jumps off the balcony in shock, he also becomes a CoViD-19 death statistic. The same is true for a sudden stroke, etc. As openly admitted by RKI president Wieler, every individual with a positive test result at the time of death is entered into the statistical register. The first “coronavirus death” in the northernmost state of Germany, Schleswig-Holstein, occurred in a palliative ward, where a patient with terminal oesophageal cancer was seeking peace before being dispatched to the “undiscovered country from which no traveler returns.” A swab was taken, just before his demise, which came back positive following his death. He might equally well have tested positive for other viruses such as rhino-, adeno- or influenza virus had he been tested for those.xxvi

However, with the emergence of a new and possibly dangerous infectious disease, autopsies should be undertaken in order to verify the actual cause of death. Only one pathologist ventured to fulfil this task in Germany. Against the specific advice of the RKI, Professor Klaus Püschel, Director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine, Hamburg University, performed autopsies on all “coronavirus victims” and found that not one of those tested had been healthy. Most had suffered from several pre-existing conditions. One in two suffered from coronary heart disease. Other frequent ailments encountered were hypertension, atherosclerosis, obesity, diabetes, cancer, lung and kidney disease, and liver cirrhosis. The same pattern was shown to have occurred in other jurisdictions. Swiss pathologist Professor Alexander Tzankov reported that many victims had suffered from hypertension, most were overweight, two-thirds suffered from heart problems, and one-third were afflicted by diabetes. The Italian Ministry of Health reported that 96% of CoViD-19 hospital deaths had been patients with at least one severe instance of co-morbidity. Almost 50% had three or more pre-existing adverse health conditions.xxvii

Interestingly, Püschel found lung embolisms in every third patient he examined. Pulmonary embolisms usually result from detachment of blood clots in deep veins of the leg that are swept into the lungs. Clots typically form when blood flow is impeded in the legs, as occurs in cases where the elderly spend the day seated and inactive. A high frequency of lung embolisms was already described in deceased influenza patients 50 years ago. Thus, we are not on the verge of discovering a unique aspect of SARS-Cov-2 that heightens its degree of threat, but we nevertheless see worldwide that elderly people are misguidedly responding to the order to stay at home, when the sheer sedentary nature of such shelter-in-place measures endanger their health as much as any virus might. Physical inactivity is a health threat for the elderly in and of itself, thromboses included. Swedish epidemiologist Professor Johann Giesecke recommended exactly the opposite: As much fresh air and activity as possible. It is refreshing to see that some physicians have the courage to speak out and to recommend another regimen.xxviii

While the number of genuine CoViD-19 fatalities remained unknown outside Hamburg, the situation was no better in other countries. Professor Walter Riccardi, adviser to the Italian Ministry of Health, stated in a March 2020 interview with The Telegraph that 88% of the Italian deaths attributed to CoViD-19 actually resulted from other causes. The problem with coronavirus death counts is that the numbers are actually gross overestimates. In Belgium, not only fatalities with a positive CoViD-19 test were entered into the tally, but also cases where CoViD-19 was merely suspected but never verified.xxix

The risk for a person under 65 in Germany was about as high as a daily drive of 24 kilometres. The risk was low even for the elderly over 80 with 10 “coronavirus deaths” per 10,000 Germans over 80. Calculating this number is simple. About 8.5 million citizens are over 80 in Germany, with about 8,500 “coronavirus deaths” recorded in this age group. This leads to an absolute risk of coronavirus death of 10 per 10,000 for the over 80 set. Now realize that every year about 1,200 of 10,000 people over 80 die in Germany (data from the Federal Office of Statistics). Nearly 50% of them due to cardiovascular diseases (CVD), almost one-third from cancer and around 10% (over 100) as a result of respiratory infections. The latter have always been caused by an array of pathogens including those of the coronavirus family. It has become apparent to many medical experts that SARS-CoV-2 is not the “killer virus” the mainstream media has made it out to

The WHO estimates that there are approximately 290,000–650,000 flu deaths per year. Now turn to CoViD-19. In May 2020, the RKI calculated that 170,000 infections with 7,000 CoViD-19 deaths equals a 4% case fatality rate, as predicted by WHO. The conclusion to be drawn from these statistics is that CoViD-19 is ten times more dangerous than seasonal flu. However, the number of infections was at least ten times higher because most mild and asymptomatic cases were not properly assessed. This would have brought the number down to a much more realistic fatality rate of 0.4%. Moreover, the number of actual CoViD-19 deaths was lower because many had actually died of other causes. Further correction of the number brings us to a rough estimate of 0.1% – 0.3%, which is in the range of moderate flu. This tallies well with the results of Professor Streeck, who arrived at an estimate of 0.24% – 0.26% for his Hamburg study. The average age of the deceased testing positive for CoViD-19 was around 81 years.

The conclusion that CoViD-19 is comparable to seasonal flu has been reached by many investigators in other countries. In an analysis of several studies, it was shown that, contingent on local factors and statistical methodology, the median infection fatality rate was 0.27%. There are many studies that show that SARS-CoV-2 is a far cry from the “killer virus” it is supposed to be.xxxi Yet, despite this fact, once testing positive for SARS-CoV-2—even falsely for that matter—an individual can remain marked as a CoViD-19 victim for life. Then, irrespective of when and why death occurs, he or she will be entered into the CoViD-19 death register. Thus, the number of coronavirus deaths will continue to soar incessantly, while the War on CoViD like the war on AIDS before it will go on for years until the globalists devise a new obsession to get everyone jittery about.

Fear in the general populace is further fuelled by reports that SARS-CoV-2 is much more dangerous than the flu because it attacks many different organs with probable long-term consequences. Newspaper reports and publications abound that the virus can be found in the heart, liver, and kidneys. It may even find its way to our central nervous system, we are told. Such headlines sound terrifying. However, obtaining positive RT-PCR results for SARS-CoV-2 in organs other than the lung is neither surprising nor significant. Two issues are of decisive importance: the actual viral load and the question of whether the viruses cause any damage. The highest SARS-CoV-2 concentrations have been found in the lungs of patients as one would naturally expect. Traces of the virus have been detected in other organs, which authors Karina Reiss and Sucharit Bhakdi believe is a matter of small concern. Until scientific evidence to the contrary is available, they contend, the findings should be regarded as trivial observations of little to no significance, yet they have been hyped to the max by the press, and the political opportunists that are harnessing the pandemic for their own nefarious purposes.

Is there a great difference between SARS-CoV-2 and the annual flu? Probably in many cases there is not. It has been known for years that influenza can affect the heart and other organs. All respiratory viruses can find their way to the central nervous system. There is no basic difference with SARS-CoV-2.xxxii The fact that SARS-CoV-2 does not constitute a public danger and that the infection often runs its course without symptoms might have one disadvantage. It was originally thought that perhaps asymptomatic people are contagious and unwittingly pass the virus on to others. This fear originated from a publication that reported that the Chinese businesswoman who infected an automotive supplier’s staff member during a visit to Bavaria displayed no symptoms herself. This publication caused a worldwide sensation with expected effects. It was believed that a deadly virus that could be transmitted by healthy individuals must by definition be a swift and invisible killer. This fear became the driving force behind many extreme preventive measures, from visiting bans for hospitalized patients to obligatory mask-wearing. However, in the midst of all the panic and pandemonium, a very important fact was overlooked. The major statement of the publication turned out to be false. A follow-up inquiry revealed that the Chinese woman had been ill during her stay in Germany and was under medication to relieve pain and reduce fever. This was not mentioned in the publication.xxxiii

This shows a general tendency in the media to suppress facts that do not support the dangerous ‘pandemic’ narrative. Why would that be? Call it paranoid if you like, but it looks like the media was tasked with generating as much fear as possible in order to escalate the crisis, with the aim of heightening all the control measures, justifying increased surveillance, tracing and tracking measures, vaccine certificate advocacy, and every other measure that reduced freedom and increased the level of abject serfdom of the population. Does this not accord with a power grab by the global elite? It certainly looks like it.

As for the reaching the verdict that this ‘pandemic’ was planned and that the release of this virus was not accidental the jury is still out. However, when one considers that the military-pharmaceutical-industrial complex is behind the gain-of-function technology that weaponizes viruses by making them more virulent and pathogenic and that the same scientists are behind the effort to develop vaccines to counteract the very viruses they themselves have devised, it is not hard to see that we have as a population have been wedged between a rock and a hard place and are slowly being crushed to death. As for the claim that the virus is a bioweapon released with the purpose of eviscerating certain segments of the population, all that is required is an examination of the effected genomes. There is absolutely no question about the fact that populations with a high ratio of Denisovan and Neanderthal genetics in their genome have been found to be especially vulnerable to the effects of CoViD-19 infection. Does this suggest that such populations have been wilfully targeted by a eugenics program to seek their removal from the human gene pool? That remains to be proven. Hopefully, this paper will have succeeded in opening a can of worms that leads to serious discussion and examination, because it is clear the problem is not going away.


i Jerry Agar, “Pandemic lessons from the 14th century,” The Toronto Star, October 20, 2020.

ii “Spanish Flu killed 50 million and millions more died in war,” The National Post, December 31, 2020.

iii Rachel Schraer, Coronavirus: “Are mutations making it more infectious?” July 1, 2020,

iv “Coronavirus mutation may have made it more contagious: study,” by University of Texas, Oct 30, 2020,

v “Machine-learning model finds SARS-COV-2 growing more infectious,” Editorial, August 24, 2020,

vi “Genetic Mutations Predispose Individuals to Severe COVID-19,” Source: Radboud University, July 26, 2020,

vii “Individual genetic variation in immune system may affect severity of COVID-19,” Source: American Society for Microbiology, April 18, 2020,

viii John Hewitt, “Could COVID-19 have wiped out the Neandertals?” December 24, 2020,

ix Frank Jordans, “Study: Neanderthal genes are a liability for COVID patients,” September 30, 2020,

x Megan Ogilve, Kenyan Wallace and Jennifer Wang, “Shocking Rates Seen in Virus Hotspots: Higher Rate Seen in Lower Income Areas,” The Toronto Star, November 17, 2020.

xi Hugo Zeberg & Svante Pääbo, “The major genetic risk factor for severe COVID-19 is inherited from Neanderthals,” Nature volume 587, pages 610–612 (2020), September 30, 2020,

xii Zaria Gorvett, “Here’s what we know sex with Neanderthals was like,” Jan 13, 2021,

xiii Joe Pinkstone, “The five genes that make you more likely to die from coronavirus or be admitted to intensive care,” December 11, 2020,

xiv Julia Evangelou Strait, “COVID-19 study looks at genetics of healthy people who develop severe illness: Researchers seek answers to virus’s mysteries, clues to possible treatments,” May 20, 2020,

xv Rebecca Morelle, “Covid: Genes hold clues to why some people get severely ill,” Dec. 12, 2020,

xvi “Coronavirus: Obesity ‘increases risks from Covid-19,’” August 26, 2020,

xvii Kate Kelland, “Obesity a driving factor in CoViD-19 deaths, global report finds,” March 4, 2021, ed. Janet Lawrence,

xviii Stephanie Seneff, “COVID-19 Reveals a New Metabolism Paradigm,” Foundation for Alternative and Integrative Medicine, originally published in Masters of Health, December 2020,

xix Zaria Gorvett, “The people with hidden immunity against Covid-19,” BBC News, July 2020,

xx “Coronavirus makes changes that cause cells not to recognize it: Discovery lays groundwork for designing novel antiviral drugs” July 24, 2020, Source: University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio,

xxi The Visual and Data Journalism Team BBC “Covid-19 pandemic: Tracking the global coronavirus outbreak,” December 21, 2020,

xxii Dr. Karina Reiss and Sucharit Bhakdi, Corona False Alarm? Facts and Figures, White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, Originally published with Goldegg Verlag GmbH, as Corona Fehlalarm? Friedrichstraße, Berlin, 2020, pp. 11, 12.

xxiii Ibid., p. 12.

xxiv Ibid.

xxv Ibid., pp.14,15.

xxvi Ibid., pp.15, 16.

xxvii Ibid. p.16.

xxviii Ibid., pp.16, 17.

xxix Ibid., p.17.

xxx Ibid.

xxxi Ibid., pp.19, 20.

xxxii Ibid., p.21.

xxxiii Ibid., p.22.


CoViD-19 Vaccines: Debunking Conspiracy Debunkers

Abstract: We are in the throes of the End Times, in which it was prophesied long ago that all our institutions would be captured and that we would be beholden to the system of the Beast. Who can argue that all of our institutions have been captured? Take the BBC for instance. Despite priding itself as one of the foremost media agencies in the world, it allowed the satanic pedophile, Jimmy Savile, to prosper as a children’s show host for the BBC for decades. The BBC denied there was any evidence linking him with any form of sexual misconduct. The BBC was even criticized in Parliament for its handling of the affair. Harriet Harman said the allegations “cast a stain” on the corporation. Now the BBC is covering up for the vaccine-makers, denying any of the allegations related to the safety, efficacy and legitimacy of the Pfizer, Moderna and other CoViD-19 vaccines being promoted as a remedy for the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Bill Gates has used the same M.O. in all of his fraud-related crime since the beginning of his depraved career. Beginning with his computer software company, the strategy was to implement Hegelian dialectics consisting of 1) Thesis: Problem, 2) Antithesis: Reaction, and 3) Synthesis: Solution. This was accomplished by his Microsoft technicians devising viruses to infect Microsoft computer software programs, causing users PCs to become infected, and then supplying the antidote in terms of Microsoft-designed Anti-Virus programs.
The user would then make the online purchase of the Anti-Virus software program and install it on their computer, and presto—problem solved, or so the user thought. What had really transpired was that, while the Anti-Virus program had neutralized the culprit virus, yet another had been seeded in the user’s hard drive, so that another virus alert would occur a few weeks later, advising the user to download another Anti-Viral software program to attend to the latest viral infection in their PC. Few ever questioned the suspicious Anti-Viral software program pop-ups that immediately appeared on the user’s PC to warn them that their computer had been infected. Could they not see that the so-called PC vaccine was linked to the virus itself and that they were each aiding and abetting the other?
As with the computer software programs, their viruses and the vaccines for the virus, so the bioweapon lab technicians experimenting with gain-of-function viruses are the same scientists working on the so-called vaccines for those weaponized viruses. And not surprisingly Dr. Evil Gates and his foundation are behind the same problem-reaction-solution strategy game to seed the viruses, provide the vaccine, implanting yet another virus, or at least the appearance of one, through the production of auto-immune symptoms by means of the vaccine itself, which would require yet another vaccine in an endless positive feedback loop of infection, sickness and death.
Now the operating system of the human being—the DNA—is being altered by an operating system devised by Gates’ brilliant but diabolical mind. With funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Moderna and Pfizer have embarked upon the creation of what are described as mRNA ‘vaccines’, which are really operating systems meant to program changes in the DNA through reprogrammed RNA transcription and translation, thereby hacking the software of life. What will occur is that the mRNA will be reprogramed to instruct the cells to generate the same protein spikes found in the CoViD-19 virus. This will have the effect of producing symptoms matching the effects of the virus itself, resulting in an auto-immune response, in which the body’s immune system will start attacking its own healthy tissues in targeting the embedded spike proteins planted there.
On top of that, Gates and company have implemented a plan to implant the enzyme Luciferase in the vaccine, so that when people pass through the military checkpoints of the future, scanners will be able detect that the person has received the CoViD-19 vaccine. Gates’ call for vaccine certificates will ultimately lead to nanobot implants aimed at serving not only as certificates, but also as a means of interfacing with 5G communication towers.
Of course, there are the usual attempts by the mainstream media outlets to debunk all these claims as outlandish conspiracy theories, which most respectable people are inured into accepting as the hairbrained ideas of disaffected, embittered, and deservedly marginalized trouble-makers.
Slapping its usual prophylactic of the disseminators of such claims, the BBC recently investigated what it refers to as “a conspiracy theory” that the coronavirus ‘pandemic’ is a cover for a plan to implant trackable ‘microchips’ in vaccine recipients and that Bill Gates is behind it. And so, I find myself in the bunker once again, debunking the conspiracy debunkers.
According to the BBC, there is no vaccine “microchip” and there is no evidence to support claims that Bill Gates is planning any such measure for the future. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation told the BBC the claim was “false.” It is hardly convincing to receive such a denial from the organization. Since when does a corporate entity speak? Who was the spokesperson? Why did they fail to identify themselves? Besides, if you pose a question related to a criminal action to criminals, they are hardly likely to admit to it. And how much do the spokespersons at the foundation actually know about the vaccine anyway? Such spokespersons may be responding on the organization’s behalf based on what little they know and have been told. They may not even be in a position to offer an expert opinion on the subject. They are, after all, acting as spokespersons for the organization, and since they are drawing a paycheck from the organization, they are hardly likely to speak ill of it or question the merits of a vaccine promoted by it.
The BBC then confirmed that Gates admitted in an interview that eventually “we will have some digital certificates,” which would be used to show who’d recovered, been tested, and ultimately, who received a vaccine. According to the BBC, Gates made no mention of microchips. This is really a question of semantics, the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning. What is meant by “digital certificates” and how are they distinguishable from microchips? They may not be chips as such, but they are still embedded in the body subcutaneously with the vaccine injection for the purpose of serving as vaccine receipt certification.
The BBC then refers to an article titled, “Bill Gates will use microchip implants to fight coronavirus.” According to the BBC, the article refers to a study, funded by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, into a technology that could store someone’s vaccine records in a special ink administered at the same time as an injection. Well, it may not technically be the same as a microchip, but it does the same thing for which a microchip is intended—stores the person’s data so that it can be scanned and verified. It amounts to a different label or name for something that does essentially the same thing.
Still, the BBC defends the technology, claiming, “However, the technology is not a microchip and is more like an invisible tattoo. It has not been rolled out yet, would not allow people to be tracked and personal information would not be entered into a database, says Ana Jaklenec, a scientist involved in the study.” Semantics Ana, semantics. Whether it’s a microchip or an invisible tattoo, it is still invasive technology being injected subcutaneously into our bodies without our permission, and in the case of many people without their “informed consent,” which violates the provisions of the Nuremburg Code. How quickly and easily it has been for governments worldwide to repeat the mistakes of past regimes without the least resistance from the public. All the authorities need to do is use a respected institution like the BBC to affirm that it is all good and everyone is lulled into a sense of compliance and acceptance. The BBC would never lie, they will say, when the fact is that skirting the issue and obfuscating is often worse because it is a grey area that is neither true nor false and leaves people in a No Man’s Land of complete uncertainty.
The BBC then defends one of the greatest criminals on the planet, Bill Gates, doubtless because, like other mainstream media agencies, it has received funding and advertising revenue from the very vaccine manufacturers the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation fund and support, hence BBC’s defense of the man: “The billionaire founder of Microsoft has been the subject of many false rumors during the pandemic. He’s been targeted because of his philanthropic work in public health and vaccine development.”
The truth is he is not the victim of false rumors. Many of the claims about him are true. He has been found liable of causing vaccine injury in thousands of Indians, and has had legal proceedings launched against him in India on that account. He has also more recently been accused of causing a polio outbreak in sub-Saharan African with a polio vaccination campaign, when this disease is not even a concern in the region, diarrhea and malaria posing far more serious disease threats.
According to the BBC, in May 2020 a YouGov poll of 1,640 people suggested 28% of Americans believed Gates wanted to use vaccines to implant microchips in people. Well, it may not be a microchip per se, but implanting an “invisible tattoo” called Luciferase, which emits a red glow subcutaneously detectable by a scanner, amounts to something just as dystopian and just as invasive as microchipping the population. Implanting an “invisible tattoo” in people is a breach of human rights and highly dehumanizing and degrading. It obviously shows that we are being treated like cattle by being forced to have something invasive embedded in our bodies. Microchip or not, it is an implant and it is scannable. Whatever the truth of these claims an “invisible tattoo” is hardly something people should be accepting and lining up for.
The BBC then attempts to debunk claims that vaccines contain the lung tissue of an aborted fetus, which the BBC alleges is false, appealing to the authority of Dr. Michael Head of the University of Southampton: “There are no fetal cells used in any vaccine production process.” Well that settles it then, doesn’t it? God has spoken. Since when is the University of Southampton the be all and end all? And who is Dr. Michael Head besides another talking head?
The BBC then refers to a video posted on an anti-vaccine Facebook page, in which “the narrator” claims is evidence of what goes into the vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and Oxford University. Why doesn’t the BBC identify the Facebook page and the video in question so those reading the article can check it out for themselves? Is it because the BBC is afraid that they might be more persuaded by the video than the broadcaster’s lame attempts to debunk and dismiss the argument? The BBC alleges that narrator had misinterpreted the study. According to the broadcaster, the study involved exploring how the vaccine reacted when introduced to human cells in a lab. However, this is merely semantics and obfuscation again. Clearly, what is implied is that cells were grown in a lab that were the descendants of embryonic cells “that would otherwise be destroyed.”
The BBC explains further, alleging that the YouTube video narrator did not understand the science:
“Confusion may have arisen because there is a step in the process of developing a vaccine that uses cells grown in a lab, which are the descendants of embryonic cells that would otherwise have been destroyed. The technique was developed in the 1960s, and no fetuses were aborted for the purposes of this research.”
Many vaccines are made in this way, explains Dr. David Matthews, from Bristol University, adding that any traces of the cells are comprehensively removed from the vaccine “to exceptionally high standards.”
The developers of the vaccine at Oxford University say they worked with cloned cells, but these cells “are not themselves the cells of aborted babies.”
Dr. Matthews further explains that the cells work like a factory for manufacturing a greatly weakened form of the virus adapted to function as a vaccine. However, even though the weakened virus is created using these cloned cells, these cells are removed when the virus is purified and are not used in the vaccine, he assures us.i
Biologist Pamela Acker, who has a master’s degree in Biology from the Catholic University of America, has presented evidence that cell lines derived from aborted babies used in the production or testing of various vaccines, including a number of CoViD vaccines, most likely came from babies who were aborted alive, and according to the general practice outlined in medical literature, may have been placed in a fridge alive, awaiting an operation to have their organs harvested.
“A number of these abortions that were done in that way were termed ‘abdominal hysterectomies’ in the medical literature. So in some cases, the women were actually being sterilized in the process as well,” she said. “So these babies were literally placed into the fridge alive and then stored between one and 24 hours until they could be dismembered, basically. And this is right there in the scientific literature.”
Bottom of Form
Acker made these comments during an online conference hosted by LifeSiteNews titled “Unmasking CoViD-19: Vaccines, Mandates, and Global Health.”
About a decade ago, Acker spent about nine months working in a lab to develop an HIV vaccine with a grant provided by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, but when her team decided to use HEK-293 cells for the project, she became troubled by the ethics of such a decision.
“At this point, most people have heard of these (cell lines) because they are connected with the CoViD vaccines, but at that time I hadn’t. So I asked (my colleague) what ‘HEK’ stands for, and she told me, ‘Human Embryonic Kidney,”’ Acker stated.
It was after reading Dr. Alvin Wong’s paper titled, “The Ethics of HEK 293,” that appeared in the 2006 autumn issue of The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, that Acker was able to come to a proper moral position.
Acker explained the meaning behind the letters and numbers HEK 293, the cell line developed by Dr. Frank Graham in the Netherlands in 1973.
“HEK stands for Human Embryonic Kidney. But 293 stands for the 293rd experiment that this particular researcher did to develop the cell lines,” she explained.
The kidney was taken from a “completely normal” preborn girl aborted in 1972 who, according to Alex van der Eb, the doctor leading the team to develop the cell line, had “nothing wrong” with her.
Acker speculates that there were probably far more abortions behind the final development of the cell line, since “for 293 experiments you need far more than one abortion. We’re talking probably 100s of abortions,” she said.
Graham, however, recently told Ian Jackson, who was conducting research in the HEK-293 cell line, that only one fetus was involved.
“On my arrival at the University of Leiden in the Netherlands I kept lab books in which I numbered my experiments in the order in which I carried them out starting in 1970. None of these experiments used human embryo kidney cells (HEK) until very late in my studies in Leiden (1973) when I carried out 2 (two!) experiments that utilized kidney cells from 1 (one!) human fetus.”
“Since abortion was illegal in the Netherlands at that time except to save the life of the mother I have always assumed that that fetus resulted from a therapeutic abortion. However, the kidney cells I used had been prepared and frozen away before I even arrived in Leiden. Consequently, I do not have first hand knowledge of the circumstances relating to that single abortion. The second of the two experiments I carried out with these HEK cells was experiment 293 and resulted in the cell line of the same name. The bottom line is that the 293-cell line resulted from cells obtained from a single fetus.”
Acker insists that Graham’s statement is “misleading at best.”
“When a cell line is developed, it is usually produced using a sample of tissue from a single individual unless it’s a hybrid cell line. So on the one hand, it is technically correct to say that the cell line was developed using one aborted baby. However, this is not an accurate representation of how many lives were actually sacrificed in the whole process of developing an aborted fetal cell line.”
Acker pointed out that there is every indication that the cells were derived from an “electively aborted” baby. “In particular, the fact that the cells were stored in the freezer lends further credence to the conclusion that HEK-293 was derived from an electively aborted fetus,” she said.
“The success and longevity of HEK-293 suggests that the specimen was remarkably well-suited for culturing, and anyone who has studied cell theory should know that you cannot derive a living cell culture from tissue that is already dead. Because of the biological impossibility of creating a live cell line from dead tissue, and the practical and biological implausibility of obtaining live tissue from a spontaneously miscarried fetus, it is far more likely that the baby from whom HEK-293 was derived was electively aborted and alive at the time of tissue extraction.”
Acker believes that the tissue from the baby used for the production of HEK-293 was likely obtained through the surgical method of whole-fetus extraction or “C-section abortion,” which can include the removal of the uterus along with the living baby still inside.
Acker then quoted Dr. Gonzalo Herranz, Professor of Histology and General Embryology at the University of Navarra, Spain, who described how abortions must be done to obtain uncontaminated fetal material.
“To obtain embryo cells, embryos from spontaneous abortions cannot be used, nor can those obtained by means of abortions performed via the vagina: in both cases, the embryo will be contaminated by micro-organisms,” wrote Herranz.
“The correct way consists in having recourse to Caesarian section or to the removal of the uterus. Only in this way can bacteriological sterility be guaranteed. In either case, then, to obtain embryo cells for culture, a programmed abortion must be adopted, choosing the age of the embryo and dissecting it while still alive to remove tissues to be placed in culture media,” (bold added) he added.
After reading Herranz account, Acker concludes, “Because of the necessity of maintaining a sterile culture of tissue for developing a cell line, it seems reasonable to conclude that there would—at minimum—had to have been some pre-arrangement to obtain sterile, unmacerated tissue from the fetus used for HEK-293. The easiest and surest way to do this is by the surgical method of whole-fetus extraction.”
Acker concludes that the formation of other cell lines derived from aborted babies and used for research purposes, as well as the development of numerous vaccines, must have involved hundreds of abortions.
“Many aborted fetal cell lines and all the aborted fetal cell lines used in currently licenced vaccines are the culmination of a series of experiments that include multiple abortions,” she said. Acker listed the following examples:
• The WI-38 cell line (used in MMR and shingles vaccines) came from the 32nd aborted baby that was used in a series of experiments. Other cell lines that came out of the Wistar Institute include WI-26 (from the 20th aborted baby) and WI-44 cell (from the 38th aborted baby).
• The MRC-5 line (used in hepatitis A, measles, and shingles vaccines) required five abortions to the course of development.
• WALVAX2, the most recent aborted fetal cell line, came from the ninth aborted baby in a series.
• RA273, which is the virus used in the rubella vaccine, originated in the 27th baby that was aborted in an effort to obtain the virus required for vaccine development. Mothers who were infected with the rubella virus during pregnancy were actively encouraged to abort their children. Forty more elective abortions for rubella virus were performed after this, though RA273 was the strain that ended up in the final vaccine preparation.
Acker said that the use of aborted fetal cell lines in medical research, at any level, “fuels a growing acceptance of using aborted babies in other types of medical research.”
“This problem is irrespective of the original number of abortions performed to obtain a cell line, and will only be exacerbated by the acceptance of HEK-293-derived CoViD vaccines,” she added.ii
Returning to Dr. Matthew’s explanation and justifications for the use of aborted fetal tissue in cell lines seem comforting, but where did the embryonic cells really come from? He claims they are cloned cells, but that the cloned cells did not come from an aborted fetus. Where did they come from then? Another point that is concerning is the claim that all remnant of this cell tissue is removed. How can they be sure that it has all been removed and that no trace of its genetic material remains in the vaccine?
The danger is being overlooked here that any human cell tissue contained in the vaccine could cause the vaccine recipient’s immune system to turn on its own health human cell tissue in an autoimmune response. Biases that involve psychological denial and a desire to ignore danger may be the greatest danger of all in scientific procedure.
The BBC then addresses arguments against a CoViD-19 vaccine, questioning why we need one at all if the chances of dying from the virus are so slim. A meme shared by people who oppose vaccination put the recovery rate at 99.97%, suggested getting CoViD-19 is a safer option than taking a vaccine.
The BBC argues that the figure referred to in the meme as the “recovery rate” is incorrect. About 99.0% of people who catch CoViD-19 survive, says Jason Oke, senior statistician at the University of Oxford. Around 100 in 10,000 will die, far higher than three in 10,000, as suggested in the meme. This translates as a 1.0% death rate. Does a 1.0% death rate justify mass worldwide vaccination? Why is it being hyped so strongly? When there have been similar death rates related to other illnesses, what makes CoViD-19 so special that vaccination is being pushed at never-before-seen levels? There’s got to be an agenda here that our political and health authorities are not revealing. There has to be a reason they are pushing the vaccine agenda so strongly, when there really isn’t a need. The fact that they are being so secretive about it should give us all cause for concern.
In all fairness, Mr. Oke does make a valid point when defending the numbers. He argues that “in all cases the risks very much depend on age and do not take into account short and long-term morbidity from CoViD-19.” It does not just come down to an issue of survival. For every person who dies, there are also those who survive, but often with long-lasting health effects.
This can contribute to a health service overburdened with CoViD-19 patients, competing with a hospital’s limited resources to treat patients with other illnesses and injuries. Concentrating on the overall death rate, or breaking down the taking of a vaccine to an individual act, misses the point of vaccinations, argues Professor Liam Smeeth of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. It should be seen as an effort by society to protect others, he says.
Mr. Oke’s point about vaccines being a means of safeguarding public health might be valid if it were true. However, there are plenty of studies showing that vaccines do damage people’s health and should never be recommended unless absolutely necessary. Unfortunately, that is not the case in most health scenarios. In most cases they are unnecessary. Whenever there is a case of medicine causing as much harm in the form of side effects and long-term health damage as the illnesses it was designed to protect people against, the wisdom of prescribing it should be questioned.
In October of 2019, a “germ game,” similar to a war game, called Event 201 was held at the behest of the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and hosted by John Hopkins University, an institution known to conduct gain-of-function research on disease germs in order to weaponize them ostensibly for learning how to defend against such agents. What was the scenario of Event 201? A pandemic outbreak of a coronavirus which would spread ‘virally’, as the saying goes, and kill a predicted 65 million people. The simulation was held only two months before the event it rehearsed for actually transpired. In the year since the outbreak, the globalists have attempted to enforce nearly every plan outlined during Event 201, including using social media to censor or restrict any news or information outside of the establishment approved narrative.iii
Unfortunately, we are being cajoled into not questioning any of the official narrative, and being accused of criminality for daring to exercise our democratic right of free speech. It seems we have made no progress as a society since the days of Socrates. We should remember that, for his act of questioning the standards and beliefs of his society, he was accused of the crime of corrupting the youth, and when convicted, faced execution by drinking poison hemlock. In our case, the situation is more tragic. We may be poisoned, not for asking questions, but for being forbidden to ask any.iv
Check out my Bill Gates’ video: “Microsoft Gates’ Limp Needle Will Never Fly”

Ode to True Love

If I could dream of the perfection of love, it would have nothing in it of half-truths and insincere proclamations. It would see fleeing toward it from a great distance the beckoning moonbeams decorating the sky or rainbows enticing onlookers to the pot of gold to be found in the blazing amber orchid glowing in the western horizon at sundown, the twilight afterglow, the dancing Indian bands reflected in the play of shadows and light in the night sky venerated as the Northern Lights. It would celebrate the harvest moon and the Mid-Autumn Festival, daybreak and the first burst of sunshine over the horizon, the accompanying cock crow, the mournful call of the mourning dove, and the solitary call of the lunatic loon. Love would see fleeing toward it from a great distance the boundless devotion of the Mother, the true god, the author of all Creation and would be hospitable and devoted enough to receive her venerable kindness, warmest embraces and softest touches. Had you never known true love you would know it when you see, hear, touch, taste and feel it not to mention sense, intuit and imagine it. For once felt it cannot be mistaken for its counterfeit, the bride Death, the Babylonian whore, Ishtar, the painted moon, the pretend virgin, with painted cheek, scarlet neck and terracotta skin. Do not be taken in by the Magdalene, the false queen, the painted princess, the artful seductress and venial threat to all that is holy and whole. Be true to thy self in being true to thy love and thou shalt never stray or go astray. Take your cue from the Mother, who has remained as true to the Father throughout the ages as the filially pious first born male that mourns for three years at the gravesite of his beloved. Have the resolve to be thyself and to choose the mate for which one was intended, thy companion bride, thy twin flame, thy mated soul, thy wedded kin. Embrace thy true fate and explore the wonders of amour, the love dalliances and cosmic play of Krishna and Radha who reinvent Creation with every kiss, nuzzle, cuddle, embrace and comingling. Find your own Vrindaven, the love garden of the true god, the Mother of all Creation and recreation, all birth and rebirth, all erection and resurrection. To thine own self be true in the truth of thy love and thou will have found the secret of Creation, the mysteries of the universe and the clavis that opens the Gates of Paradise.


“Anti-Life Health Agenda”.

“Anti-Life Health Agenda”.
The Divine Mother, Sanda Davis, has made me aware of the existence of an Anti-Universe. As I understand her teachings, the Anti-Father, who wished to make himself the male aspect of God, sought to do away with the Father and the universe of the Father by creating a series of Antis, i.e. Anti-Life, Anti-Order, Anti-Justice, Anti-Paradise, and their corresponding Entities of Lawlessness, the Dark Law, Death, etc. 
If we apply the metaphysics to physics, we can see that in keeping with the principal “As Above So Below,” there are many Anti-Life, Anti-Vitality and Anti-Health principles being applied in medicine as we speak. What do we call the very immune system components that are supposed to protect us but Anti-bodies! This means that we are not protected by our Divine spiritual bodies. Instead, we have Anti-bodies, which are a double-edged sword, in that they can be made to attack the very body they are meant to serve, as they do in the case of auto-immune diseases. And what causes this situation but Anti-biotics, which act as the catalyst or locust for turning the Anti-bodies against the host body! 
Vaccinations do the same thing, as the seeds of illness are planted with the vaccines. For instance, the CDC recently got caught concealing the truth about vaccines contributing to the soaring stats for autism. On a related point, autism was virtually unheard of in China before vaccination was recently introduced over there. Donald Trump recently put his presidential hopes on the line to expose the truth about the link between vaccination and autism, holding the documented evidence in his hand. That’s integrity. Sad that Anti-Universe, Anti-God and Anti-Christ have been able in the past to so gain the upper hand that we experienced such resident evil on this planet for so long. Now thanks to the whistle-blowers, the Anti-Health, Anti-Vitality and Anti-Life agendas are coming apart at the seams so it seems.

"Anti-Life Health Agenda".

“Anti-Life Health Agenda”.
The Divine Mother, Sanda Davis, has made me aware of the existence of an Anti-Universe. As I understand her teachings, the Anti-Father, who wished to make himself the male aspect of God, sought to do away with the Father and the universe of the Father by creating a series of Antis, i.e. Anti-Life, Anti-Order, Anti-Justice, Anti-Paradise, and their corresponding Entities of Lawlessness, the Dark Law, Death, etc. 
If we apply the metaphysics to physics, we can see that in keeping with the principal “As Above So Below,” there are many Anti-Life, Anti-Vitality and Anti-Health principles being applied in medicine as we speak. What do we call the very immune system components that are supposed to protect us but Anti-bodies! This means that we are not protected by our Divine spiritual bodies. Instead, we have Anti-bodies, which are a double-edged sword, in that they can be made to attack the very body they are meant to serve, as they do in the case of auto-immune diseases. And what causes this situation but Anti-biotics, which act as the catalyst or locust for turning the Anti-bodies against the host body! 
Vaccinations do the same thing, as the seeds of illness are planted with the vaccines. For instance, the CDC recently got caught concealing the truth about vaccines contributing to the soaring stats for autism. On a related point, autism was virtually unheard of in China before vaccination was recently introduced over there. Donald Trump recently put his presidential hopes on the line to expose the truth about the link between vaccination and autism, holding the documented evidence in his hand. That’s integrity. Sad that Anti-Universe, Anti-God and Anti-Christ have been able in the past to so gain the upper hand that we experienced such resident evil on this planet for so long. Now thanks to the whistle-blowers, the Anti-Health, Anti-Vitality and Anti-Life agendas are coming apart at the seams so it seems.

Dr Andrew Wakefield The callous disregard On Vaccines Radio Interview

A Freedom Talk Radio Setv Exclusive Interview Vaccine Doctor Dr Andy Wakefield

Andy Peacher @ Author Timothy Spearman  2 peas in a pod-cast

2 peas in a podcast

Live at 3pm Uk Time 10am Eastern Usa Time. Sunday 15th Feb 2015

Author Timothy Spearman Interviews Dr Andy Wakefield

Dr Andy Wakefield reveals the inside story of desperate parents trying to help their autistic children, only to be labelled as abusers by social workers, medical professionals, and the courts.

Listen Live Click The Image Here



Andrew Wakefield reveals the inside story of desperate parents trying to help their autistic children, only to be labelled as abusers by social workers, medical professionals, and the courts.

As the number of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders grows each year, new discoveries and controversies arise. Andrew Wakefield explores many of these in his thorough investigation of the recent trial case of the “Arizona 5,” which destroyed an Arizona family. Two parents, with five children on the spectrum, were accused of Münchausen syndrome by proxy—a rare form of child abuse—and were ganged up on by physicians, child protective services, and the courts, who alleged that the parents fabricated medical symptoms in all five children. However, Wakefield now presents ample evidence that was disregarded and which would have proven the parents’ innocence.

Families affected by autism suffer great hardship and prejudice, particularly as they navigate the uncertain waters of diagnosis, treatment, and education. The shocking story of the Arizona 5 family delves into the tremendous challenges some parents have to face, especially if their views on how to treat the syndrome don’t align with the medical world’s standards. Wakefield also includes numerous studies and research trials that support the controversial yet significant roles that vaccines and diet play in autism, factors many medical professionals wrongfully dismiss.

With Special Guests

Christina England

christina england

Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. She left school to work in a children’s library, specializing in story telling and book buying. In 1978 Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the eelderly in 1980.
 After dedicating much of her spare time helping disabled children in a special school, she then worked in a respite unit in a leading teaching hospital.

 In 1990 Christina adopted the first of two disabled boys, both with challenging behavior, complex disabilities, and medical needs. In 1999 she was accused of Munchausen’s by Proxy after many failed attempts to get the boys’ complex needs met. Finally, she was cleared of all accusations after an independent psychologist gave both boys the diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and ADHD as part of a complex tapestry of disorders. During the assessments it was discovered through the foster care diaries that the eldest boy had reacted adversely to the MMR vaccine.
 After taking A Level in Psychology and a BTEC in Learning Disabilities Ms. England then spent many years researching vaccines and adverse reactions. She went on to gain an HND in journalism and media and is currently writing for the American Chronicle, the Weekly Blitz and Vaccination Truth on immunization safety and efficacy.
 England’s main area of expertise is in researching the areas surrounding false allegations of child abuse. Her work is now read internationally and has been translated into many languages.
England has been a guest on Holy Hormones Honey — The Greatest Story Never Told! on KRFC FM 88.9 in, Colorado. She speaks at seminars worldwide and has been invited to speak in London and Canada in 2011.

Sallie Elkordy

sallie 3

We all are activists on a given issue, but it is in degrees. How loud do we protest? How may people do we interface with on our chosen topic of activism? How hard do we strive to change the future for the betterment of our children and all humanity. TLB is proud to know, partner with and be associated with Sallie Elkordy in any fashion. Here is an individual who lives, breaths and dreams her activism … and that chosen subject is Vaccines.

TLB rants and rails constantly about the evil of vaccines, having published many articles and radio shows speaking to this blight, but Sallie is A REAL BOOTS ON THE GROUND ACTIVIST engaging herself daily in educating and physically influencing her community. From local political involvement to planned events and media, Sallie is one of the most active ACTIVISTS we have ever known and we can not sing her praises loud enough … although we will try!

What we present here is Sallie’s Call To Arms for New York City and indeed the world. Information on her special event is all included below as well as a great discussion we had the privilege to record with her. NYC you are under the gun and your children are being targeted … Sallie has taken up the sword for you … will you let her march alone ???

The Pharmaceuticals Are Doctoring the Medicine

               The Pharmaceuticals Are Doctoring the Medicine

                     By Timothy Spearman

Four centuries ago, Francis Bacon invented modern empirical science, which depended on five-sense reasoning to prove a scientific proposition was valid. While this was necessary in order to invoke a certain scientific rigor in our pure sciences, it created a blind spot in scientific inquiry that has never really been resolved. It left no room for other modalities that could not be proven valid by five-sense empirical science. The benefits of yoga meditation could not be quantified and measured by scientific method. Yet its practitioners will maintain that they derive a great deal of scientific benefit from the practice. What the Indians call Prana and the Chinese call Qi – subtle energies found within the body whose flow can be manipulated by acupuncture and herbal medicine – cannot be confirmed by the empiricist who adheres to the pharmaceutical allopathic medical model. He will refer to these medical modalities as alternative medicine, when in fact it is his brand of medicine that is actually alternative, since it has only been in existence for just over a century, while acupuncture and herbal medicine are time-honoured traditions that have been practiced for millennia all over the world.

Allopathic or pharmaceutical medicine is regarded as a science by its adherants and practitioners, yet in many ways it is a pseudo-science. Medical experimentation is often shoddy and results are often engineered by doctors who have certain professional obligations to those dispensing the grant money. Results are often tailored to meet the demands of the end-user of the research and the findings are often shamefully disingenuous. Medical peer review is often influenced by fascist forces driven by eugenicists with a eugenics agenda like Bill Gates and the infamous Gates Foundation, which has been caught red-handed dispensing tainted vaccines, which the Indian government wishes to hold the genocidal Gates accountable for. In fact, Gates has long been in cohoots with the intelligence agencies controlled by the Vatican. Microsoft operating systems are notorious for their spyware capability. And Microsoft generated viruses like the conficker virus were meant to be part of a projection analysis to see how many hosts could be infected by biological agents which adhered to the same mathematical model in terms of infection vectors and contagion ratios.

George Soros is another major investor in the eugenics, depopulation and genocide program. In fact, he is responsible for funding the development of the very labs responsible for manufacturing disease agents like Ebola. George Soros, who funded the bioweapons lab in Africa where Ebola broke out and profits from destabilizing countries and wrecking their economies, is a murderous paedophile and satanist. He stands accused of conspiring to commit bio-terrorism, crimes against humanity, genocide and conspiracy to commit mass murder. It appears that Soros may have violated the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989.


According to the US-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a bioterrorism attack is the deliberate release of viruses, bacteria, or other germ agents used to cause illness or death in people, animals, or plants. These agents are typically found in nature, but using recombinant technology can be made more resistant to current medicines and to be more transmissible and contagious.

That law defines a biological agent as:


” …any micro-organism, virus, infectious substance, or biological product that may be engineered as a result of biotechnology, or any naturally occurring or bioengineered component of any such microorganism, virus, infectious substance, or biological product, capable of causing death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism; deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or material of any kind…

In a stunning piece of propaganda in establishment newspaper The Telegraph it seems the British public are being prepared for a false flag Ebola outbreak at the Commonwealth Games starting in Glasgow on July 23. The Telegraph buried a key aspect of the Story – the evidence that a US bioweapons lab in Sierra Leone with links to the Soros and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is likely the origin of the current Ebola outbreak. While The Telegraph buried facts about the existence of this hospital bioweapons research lab and also ignores information in the US Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) Ebola fact sheet, which identifies hospitals as the place where an Ebola outbreak is most likely to occur, Washington Post reporter Terence McCoy has entered the realm of fairy tales by blaming the current Ebola outbreak on deforestation, another stunning example of pseudo-science. Even more stunning is blaming the Ebola virus on fruit bats, which is no less of a pseudo-scientific claim than blaming African green monkeys for the HIV/AIDS scourge.

Take this website as a for instance – The website freely admits that Professor Robert F. Garry is “currently managing the consortium of scientists who are developing modern diagnostics for several biodefense pathogens.”

Consortium member, Dr. James E. Robinson, is named as “a collaborating investigator in four large consortia projects funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.”

Consortium member, Dr. Pardis Sabeti, has received fellowships from the Rhodes Scholarship, the Soros Fellowship, L’Oreal For Women in Science Fellowship, according to the website.

Scientist Stephen Gire has links to the CDC and US military. Do you mean the U.S. military as in the CIA’s bioweapons program? Most probably. He “spent time at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention researching vector-borne infectious diseases. He then moved on to complete a Masters of Public Health at Columbia University and a three-year fellowship with the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). He has researched viruses such as West Nile, Dengue Fever, Monkeypox and Ebola, and he conducts on-site training in biological techniques to laboratory staff in the developing world.”

Given such credentialed eugenicists having myriad conflicts of interests, it is reasonable to ask for an investigation into whether this particular US bioweapons lab at the geographical epicentre of the current Ebola outbreak actually caused the Ebola outbreak.

In 2009, Baxter in Austria was caught contaminating 72 kilos of seasonal flu with the deadly bird flu virus in its biosecurity level 3 laboratory. It later emerged from documents posted on Wikileaks that Baxter was a US defense or military asset. As for Jane Burgermeister, the whistleblowing Austrian journalist responsible for the scoop as well as potentially saving the lives of thousands or even millions of people in Europe, she was nearly committed to a mental institution for taking on the medical mafia. And the brainwashed multitudes continue to make fun of conspiracy theorists, while heroes and heroines like Jane Burgermeister continue to save their undeserving bacon. In fact, documents as well as current mainstream media hype point to plans for false flag Ebola bioterrorism attacks in hospitals and clinics against US and UK citizens using occasions like the Commonwealth Games in Scotland to spread panic, but as usual the complacent public continues to be wooed by the bread and circuses, proving that we haven’t advanced one step since the Roman era and are as shallow as ever. The ultimate purpose of all this pseudo-science on Ebola is to implement martial law measures contained in epidemic and pandemic plans and so gain total control of the population at a time when the financial system is close to collapse.

Given that the pharmaceutical cartel is complicit in all this, one really needs to ask if it’s beneficial to rely on their so-called medicine. It doesn’t look like it to be fair and to be frank. In fact, the word ‘pharmacy’ is derived from the Greek pharmakon, which means ‘remedy’ and ‘poison’. How charming. The whole pharmaceutical medical paradigm is based on prescribing a poison to recommend a cure. And they have the audacity to call so-called “alternative” medicine practitioners snake oil salesmen, when Parlaselsis, the father of modern pharmaceutical medicine was an alchemist, who was experimenting with the same poisonous substances used in smelting – copper sulfide, zinc, lead, mercury, etc. – to remove impurities from the body.

As for the pseudo-science of AIDS treatment, it’s astounding how true it is that the blind are lead by the blind. There is no empirical evidence whatsoever that anyone is HIV-positive, since the virus is too microscopic to be detected so we are told. In fact, the test to verify if someone is HIV-postive tests for HIV-related antibodies, not the virus itself. However, there is no way of proving that the antibodies in question are HIV-related, when the virus is alleged to have an exceptionally high rate of mutation. If that is so, how can it be definitively shown that the virus is HIV-related when it could just as easily be there for some other pathogen as innocuous as the common cold? The cases of false positives are well documented. It has also been shown that the seven year period when AZT drug cocktails were the recommended treatment for HIV/AIDS patients was the peak period for AIDS-related deaths in Canada. AZT was a chemotherapy treatment that had been shelved back in the 70’s because it was found to be so reactive and dangerous that it was found to be unsafe. Yet when people were given the falsely grim prognosis of AIDS, they were willing to put up with the agonizing and harmful side effects of AZT under the false proviso that it would give them a fighting chance. It did no such thing. In fact, it is well known that chemotherapy weakens the immune system, and since this was such a reactive and dangerous brand of chemo, it literally destroyed the immune system of the patients it was meant to treat. In other words, the patients died of MIDS (Medicine Induced Immune Deficiency Syndrome). Yet the deaths were listed on the medical charts as AIDS-related.    

Today they prescribe anti-retroviral medications, which like AZT drug cocktails, prescribed in the 80s, patients are advised to take, even though they have no observable signs of being sick, since they have not yet developed AIDS. Instead, they are told that the drugs will delay the onset of AIDS. How can they ever empirically verify that this is the case, when the patient will at some point develop the full blown AIDS symptoms? Where is the evidence that the prescription has actually done what it was prescribed to do? And this is empirical science? Please.

Medicine needs to be liberated from the yoke of the eugenicists. They have created a three-tier system of medicine on the planet. The first tier elite have access to homeopathic and naturopathic remedies that they know are more beneficial to health. Meanwhile, the servile masses in the so-called First World developed countries are issued harmful allopathic pharmaceutical medicines, which are meant to shorten or even end their lives. The vaccines certainly due that, and by Bill Gates own admission, are meant to do just that. He is quoted as saying, “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that number by ten or fifteen percent.” This proves vaccines are not for keeping people alive, but for killing off as many as possible. Have you seen what’s in them? Visit the Center for Disease Control website and have a look. Whatever they’re supposed to prevent they give you. How can you ever prove they did or didn’t? All the pharmaceutical mafia has to say is that it didn’t work as effectively as they had hoped. Merck is in bed with the CIA’s bioweapons program and so is the Gates Foundation. Gates is a deep cover CIA operative. He is a genocidal monster worse than anything the AshkeNAZIs could cook up (pardon the pun). As for the Third World, they are relegated to the third tier of medicine, which isn’t medicine at all but poison. All the eugenicists’ poisons are tried out on the poor to see how successful they are at killing masses of humanity. If they work successfully, they try them out on the undesirable population segments in the so-called developed world, such as gays, who got the brunt of the Hepatitis B vaccine trials undertaken Stateside, which unleashed the scourge of HIV/AIDS on American homosexuals.

The world needs a new paradigm of medicine that embraces the metaphysician. What is meant by this term in this context? The word means “beyond the physic” so a metaphysician would be a physician of the human spirit and astral body. Healing must happen at both levels if it is to be effective: the physical and the spiritual. Children should be learning Tai Chi and Yoga in school and practicing it. They should be taught yoga meditation for peace of mind and clarity of perception. Would the narrow-minded so-called educators taught under their own limited worldview of western science even consider this? They might now that they are all dropping like flies from Ebola, AIDS and other diseases. Their arrogant dismissal of other medical paradigms may soon turn into a desperate appeal for help.